hold on, when did the "first generation" of generative ai start?

Wow, I guess humans and LLMs aren't so different after all!

is this trying to say "discrimination against racists is the real racism"? ... Would that be "racismism"?

I appreciate that he specifies that the dumpster fire is, in fact, metaphorical.

When people say stuff like this it always makes me wonder "what pace, exactly?" Truthfully, I feel like hearing someone say "well, generative AI is such a fast-moving field" at this point is enough on its own to ping my BS detector.

Maybe it was forgivable to say it in May 2023, but at this point it definitely feels like progress has slowed down/leveled off. AI doesn't really seem to me to be significantly more capable than it was a year ago -- I guess OpenAI can generate videos now, but it's been almost a year since "will smith eating spaghetti," so...

even putting aside philosophy/ethics, have they never heard of common expressions like "too much of a good thing" or "the dose makes the poison"? it's just an extremely, extremely common idea basically everywhere except in the tech industry

it's a shame, because gender transition stuff is probably one of the most successful "human biohacking" type things in common use today, and it's also just... really cool. alas, bigotry

Oh I wasn't commenting to criticize you -- just adding more insane context for people who didn't feel like reading the full article lol

Exman tells PopSci that, even with ChatGPT’s deficiencies, administrators believe the tool remains the simplest way to legally comply with new legislation.

I mean it's certainly simpler to do things incorrectly. Can't argue with this logic