672
submitted 8 months ago by W_oOo_ke_3333@lemmy.today to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 119 points 8 months ago

A true patriot supports local spyware!

[-] Bristle1744@lemmy.today 25 points 8 months ago

Please log my IP address. This is a house that loves Managed Democracy^tm^

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 17 points 8 months ago

Please log my IP address.

127.0.0.1

Checkmate. We're watching you.

[-] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 8 months ago

lol I started DDoSing this losers IP address, good op sec dumba

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 8 months ago

I don't discriminate. I say the data protection of all of these services is terrible and you shouldn't use them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 44 points 8 months ago

23andMe is much, much worse than the others due to the nature of the data it sells.

[-] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 8 months ago

Also, you don't actually need to share your own data to be vulnerable. Some stupid relative sharing their genetic information is enough to have some ideas about you. I'm fortunate that it's hasn't caught on in my home country.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 43 points 8 months ago

This forced sale of TikTok for national security is a farce because they were already forced to move their service to the US on an American-owned hosting provider, and they have already put people with a history of aligning with “American interests” into executive positions, like CEO Shou Zi Chew and vice president Michael Beckerman. I think the US “intelligence community” already has everything it needs to monitor and control TikTok.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have a geoIP alias on my firewall and can still see TikTok sending telemetry to a Chinese CDN.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago

If so, then maybe the US “intelligence community” doesn’t actually see that as a problem, despite the cold war propaganda.

[-] redditReallySucks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 8 months ago

It doesn't matter where the servers are located physically but who can access the data that's on them

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 14 points 8 months ago

They were physically relocated to the US so that the US can access the data, as people like Edward Snowden and Mark Klein have shown us. I’m sure the US knows precisely what data is and isn’t being sent to China.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 39 points 8 months ago

I would say make laws about data collection, usage, etc. instead of banning TikTok.

Heck, fix more important problems like income disparity, hunger, homelessness, healthcare, our wasteful spending, so many things more important and yet we're wasting time on TikTok.

I don't think people think this is a good use of time.

Seriously, it's government overreach and ignoring freedom of speech, etc.

[-] thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

We can agree that there is at least a slight difference in having your own (or a friendly nation’s) Government tracking you, versus allowing a competing nation to have direct access to over half of the adult US population (as per their recent push-notification stunt), as well as a robust collection of their interests and preferences.

There is a reason China has banned most US-based software in the mainland (Meta, Google, etc.); in favour of self-developed alternatives. This is just treatment in kind; it’s not an outright ban, rather a forced sale to prevent more of that user data falling into dubious hands.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I'm not really ok with that type of anti other country behavior in (edit to add the word: almost) any case. Heck, I want cheap Chinese EV options in the US too.

Make government (and other) tracking opt-out-able by law. That is the law we need. Not this bs version.

This current bill literally sounds like it's written by American companies to squash a foreign competition. You know Facebook, YouTube, etc. are biting at the teeth for more users (and ad revenue) of short form content; especially if TikTok users scattered to other platforms.

Once again: give users the freedom to chose what they want. This is a government overreach.

Yes, there is a difference. Having your own government spy on you is way worse because it has the monopoly on violence over you. No one protects you from that. But your government will (try to) protect you from foreign influences.

There is a reason for the outrage when PRISM came out of the closet.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] makeasnek@lemmy.ml 32 points 8 months ago

How come every thread I see about this topic, there is nobody who is concerned about letting the federal government dictate which apps you can and cannot use to communicate with other people? This is some 1984 shit.

[-] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 8 months ago

Because it isn't new nor special.

Apps are a Service and services have been and are regulated for decades now and the system have been always arbitrary as fuck.

In the case of TikTok, the west, as a military alliance, should be concerned due to the nature of current valid Chinese laws and the implications of it.

And e.g. facebook has proven that they don't like to stick to rules about how to handle data. In case of TikTok, this could easily have bigger implications for e.g. the American military.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

US companies != US federal government

[-] admin@lemmy.today 18 points 8 months ago

US federal gov already got their hand in companies ass.

[-] NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

reverse order

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 8 months ago

At first I thought you were being serious, but I think this is a joke? That Americans don't care how many companies spy on them as long as it's not the government?

Which, is laughable because of course the government has contacts at everyone one of these companies and they'd gladly hand over your data then go to court to protect it

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 8 months ago

Ever heard about CLOUD act?

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago
[-] BaldProphet@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

You're also misunderstanding. I won't deny that US companies seek profit wherever they can, even from unethical sources. I also don't doubt their involvement with law enforcement and intelligence agencies. But a company seeking profit through a partnership with the United States federal government is not the same as the totalitarian Chinese government requiring oversight of Chinese companies.

It might not seem like a big difference to you, but it's an important one to me.

[-] davel@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

If you find it upsetting that the Chinese state imposes its will on the Chinese capitalist class, then you must really like capitalism, where the capitalist class imposes its will on the state.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

Spottily is a Swedish company

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] isthereanydeal@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 11 points 8 months ago
[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 23 points 8 months ago

Gathering and selling your data.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

So much data to infer from your music tastes. Listening to music about breakup? You had a breakup yourself. Listening to classical music? You're a top earner. Listening to Eminem? You like mom's spaghetti.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

This meme is a bit dishonest because its about Chinese government harvesting this data not about companies harvesting it. Both are bad but ones substantially worse.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 19 points 8 months ago

Yeah, if China wants the data of Americans they should buy it from American companies, not harvest it themselves.

They're not mad about leaking data, they're mad that China is drinking their milkshake.

[-] SleepyWheel@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

American companies have way more power over my life than the Chinese government

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Spying on user data is a constitutional right of US companies, what are the poor going to live on when they can't traffic with your data, or when a disgusting red communist company steals their bread? A little more proper patriotism, guys. Bad enough that the EU is cutting the wings of this companies, therefore also don't use EU apps to make America great again.

[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 points 8 months ago

I don't think 23andme and TikTok are even comparable to the rest of the list.

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

Keep spamming, maybe you'll astroturf successfully at some point.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
672 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45560 readers
1177 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS