335
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Corngood@lemmy.ml 84 points 1 year ago

One thing is for sure: no other fork will have a name this good.

[-] flameguy21@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Nuzu was a pretty good name even if it's already dead

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

bullied to death literally

I'd go with Yuza, the Korean version of the Yuzu fruit. Could be verbalized as "yowza."

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I just hope the one for the next system is called tuzu lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the Suyu development team has decided to avoid "any monetization,"

Should of always been like that

[-] otp@sh.itjust.works 78 points 1 year ago

of

*have

(Or "Should've")

[-] ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi 34 points 1 year ago

Either emulation is legal and you're therefore okay with devs getting payment for tgeir labor or it's illegal and they need to keep as low a profile as they can

I hate people who try to be on both sides

[-] 520@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

The monetisation part wasn't what fucked them over, it was merely what made their more illicit activities worse.

The Yuzu team were using leaks to tweak their code, namely the ToTK leak.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IP law is at it's core about monetization and developer compensation. The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

[-] gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

You are absolutely mistaken. See Sony's lawsuits against Connectix and Bleem!, which were both commercial products, and Sony lost every lawsuit they filed against them.

I don't know where you and the other thousands of people parroting this online are getting this from, but it is not true and never has been.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

Sony lost all of their suits against Bleem!, sorry but it's not illegal to monetize an emulator. The rampant piracy they were engaging in and essentially promoting is what fucked them. Including using leaks to test their emulator against and patch issues with games that hadn't been released yet. There's been talk that they also had a ROM stash on their discord.

[-] 520@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Nope. There have been monetised emulators before that have been deemed legal (see Bleem!)

Also if you break copyright law, the rights holder can come after you regardless if you are making money or not.

[-] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I agree but pay walling features is just asking for trouble, I should of specified what I meant with pateron.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] echo64@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Switch emulation would be 1/10th of where it is now without it.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Anyone trying to make money on a licensed IP they don’t own is in hot water.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Disagree. People deserve compensation for labor, and the Yuzu devs did good work. It's our laws that suck.

[-] Muscar@discuss.online 3 points 1 year ago

Congratulations, you've shown everyone how dumb you are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com 62 points 1 year ago

They could start by developing in the open and not in some shitty discord group.

[-] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago

SueYou is an awesome name for N**tendo emulator

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Still the same Contributor License Agreement as Yuzu to make proprietary versions. They've learned nothing.

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

well they're not completely proprietary...
ea is just latest master, merged with unspecified list of work-in-progress prs, and built together with custom branding.
there's zero proprietary code in it....
but you don't know what code specifically was used to build it.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well they’re not completely proprietary…

The point of a CLA is to eventually sell proprietary versions. There is objectively no need for a CLA in a fully FOSS/GPL application because the GPL already clarifies everything that's needed.

Edit: "suyu also needs to be a product. We need to find ways to monetise the project" Direct quote from https://gitlab.com/suyu-emu/suyu/-/wikis/Contributor-License-Agreement-Policy

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And that's what's gonna fuck them; making money off it. Unless they have enough money to actually go to court and fight Nintendo.

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

What if both the new version and old version of the license has something you disagree with in them?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] IYeetKids@reddthat.com 24 points 1 year ago

This is one of the most clever names I've seen for an emulator.

[-] kif@lemmy.nz 14 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of sosumi, a Linux util for one-click MacOS virtual machines. Sosumi also happens to be the name of the alert/error sound in early MacOS.

[-] mac@infosec.pub 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sosumi (the alert sound) was named due to Apple having a long running court battle with a music company called Apple Corps, link here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

So how long until Nintendo tries to claim copyright to the code that was previously open source and threaten to sue the Suyu team just to scare them into settling?

[-] 520@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago

They'd face a mountain of opposition from the open source community at large.

Yuzu was licensed under the GPL. Even if Nintendo are the new owners of the Yuzu code, they cannot retroactively close-source the previously open code, per the license.

If they tried that and it looked like they could set a precedent, it could spell serious trouble for other GPL projects like the Linux kernel. And they've got some serious financial backing.

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

It's illegal for them to un GPL it, though. They could try, but they would fail. The only precedent it would set is to encourage people to not waste their time.

[-] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Roe v Wade was overturned.

Legally speaking, nothing is impossible if one party is motivated enough, and other parties are too apathetic to do anything about it. And by other parties, I mean the public at large. The Linux and EFF communities are small by comparison.

[-] 520@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Exactly. And even if it did go to court, it wouldn't be hard to get EFF and the Linux Foundation to help Suyu.

[-] CCF_100@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only way I know of to change a GPL license is to somehow contact everyone who has ever contributed to the project to agree to re-license their code, but there is no way I see Nintendo being able to pull that off... And, even if they did somehow manage to contact every one of these individuals, there's no way they'd get them to agree to that, no matter how much money they may have...

[-] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I mean, many thought the same of Yuzu.

In reality, Nintendo doesn't want to go to court. They didn't want to go to court vs Yuzu. They just wanted a settlement so they can 100% control the narrative. That's traditional Japanese corporation 101. Yuzu's case was never actually about piracy, copyright infringement, or anything else.

I would not be shocked to see Nintendo either attempt to un-GPL the code, claim some sort of copyright over forks, or even to maliciously inject new code in an attempt to gain access to user IP addresses and just send out letters to every Yuzu user. Nintendo really is that petty, look at what they did to Gary Bowser. They will 100% go after other emulators like this now that they know the developers will just give up in a week.

[-] 520@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, many thought the same of Yuzu.

Problem is, Yuzu team were breaking other laws. They were tweaking their codebase based on leaks.

I would not be shocked to see Nintendo either attempt to un-GPL the code, claim some sort of copyright over forks, or even to maliciously inject new code in an attempt to gain access to user IP addresses and just send out letters to every Yuzu user. Nintendo really is that petty, look at what they did to Gary Bowser. They will 100% go after other emulators like this now that they know the developers will just give up in a week.

Do you know how much of society depends on GPL code? Every Android phone, every Chromebook, most servers and many billion dollar companies rely on GPL code. Nintendo attempting to un-GPL Yuzu will wake some sleeping giants, who will realise other people might attempt to do the same to the projects they rely upon. As a result the defence fund for anyone Nintendo goes after like this will end up VERY well funded. As in, make-Disney-shit-their-pants well-funded.

As for your point on Gary Bowser, you're kinda leaving out that Nintendo had a MUCH stronger case against him. Unlike emulators, the development of piracy modchips is very much illegal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

You know what's a really good defence: Not being based in the fucking US.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"Suyu currently exists in a legal gray area we are trying to work our way out of," contributor and Discord moderator Sharpie told Ars in a recent interview.

The Suyu project arose out of "a passion for Switch emulation" and a desire not to see "years of impressive work by the Yuzu team go to waste," Sharpie said.

But that passion is being tempered by a cautious approach designed to avoid the legal fate that befell the project's predecessor.

The Suyu devs have also been warned against "providing step-by-step guides" like the ones that Yuzu offered for how to play copyrighted games on their emulator.

Those guides were a major focus of Nintendo's lawsuit, as were some examples of developer conversations in the Yuzu Discord that seemed to acknowledge and condone piracy.

Suyu, by contrast, is taking an extremely hard line against even the hint of any discussion of potential piracy on its platforms.


The original article contains 297 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 48%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

They are still running afowl of the anti circumvention rules in the dmca. Just saying you have to provide your own keys isn't enough.

A switch emulator that wants to be safe from nintendo has to have no capability of circumventing the copyright protection mechanisms nintendo employs.

Look at vlc for inspiration. It can play blurays, it can't circumvent the copyright protection of blurays. But if you provide the keys and the library that decodes the content then it can play them just fine. This keeps vlc safe.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This appears incorrect. Multiple emulators have ways to circumvent the copyright protection mechanism. None of them are being hit. Dolphin legit has the keys in their package. It's why Steam didn't platform them, but Nintendo knows and Dolphin is not changing. It would be literally the cost of the letter to get Dolphin to change. Nintendo hasn't even sent that letter.

What Yuzu did wrong was outside of "anti circumvention rules" that you seem afraid of.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry but it's not wrong. The anti circumvention clause in the drmc was the direct complaint from nintendo against yuzu. Please research that clause and the legal prior art, especially against decss. I've had this conversation too many times to repeat it again.

[-] Kinglink@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"I've done it too many times to repeat it again" Really?

Isn't that kind of beneath you? That's the type of shit someone would say on a playground.

Besides which the full complaint doesn't appear to be available anywhere, but what has been shown has not said what you're claiming.

However other people might have more knowledge about this situation than you seem to, besides which other pieces that have been revealed since the original complaint have shown it's not just about the ability to circumvention technology. So you know.. maybe read more, or stop acting like you have all the answers when you don't?

On the other hand consider if it was exactly what you say it is, why isn't Cemu and Ryujinx getting their own version of the note... hint: it's not just about the circumvention...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddithalation@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago

ok but how does the bluray library stay safe? its still a similar problem. for piracy sites, a lot of them seem to deal with it by just having it be hosted in a country that doesnt care enough to shut them down.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Like you already pointed out there are ways for the library to stay safe, the important point is being disconnected from the emulator.

[-] Monomate@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

That's assuming the Suyu team is based on the USA, where the DMCA can screw them over. As they're hosting their code on GitLab istead of GitHub, it may hint they got this covered.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's worth noting that many countries around the world have their own versions of the anti circumvention clause of the dmca.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
335 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18892 readers
250 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS