472
(page 2) 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] laurelraven 12 points 8 months ago

My gut reaction is to say "that's blatantly illegal", but maybe local law is different... I'm pretty sure it's not legal in the US at the very least though

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

That's a paddlin'

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

No it's not normal and it doean't look legal either

[-] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

If a company needs byzantine rules around compensation, don't engage. This was a solved problem centuries ago through much more straightforward means, and these casino-like rules only favor the house.

On top of what others are saying, this text does not adequately describe the conditions of resignation and "if you leave". This is also clearly not legal copy which suggests it's not a part of any contract, or is at best paraphrasing the intent of an actual contract of dubious legal standing. Either way, a lawyer would probably have a field day with this.

Also, a resignation can be coerced by giving you a false choice, usually to the tune of "sign this or else". Combined with the "you didn't complete your grace period" language, they are more or less incentivized to do this to all but their top performers.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

Forward this, along with any relevant contact information to your state's labor board, your state's Attorney General & the Federal Dept of Labor.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

"At-will employment for me but not for thee", eh? Very cheeky.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Normal for some companies to enact policies that are batshit crazy? Yes.

Legal? Not a chance in hell.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Never had anything like that in the US.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago
[-] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It sounds like this job pays monthly, is that correct?

Does the "security deposit" take you below minimum wage for the month (or portion of the month if you start between the 2nd and the 10th)?

If you agree to it and it doesn't take you below minimum wage it might be legal depending on your location. If it goes below minimum wage and you're in the US I'm pretty sure it's illegal. Definitely if you go below federal minimum wage, but if you're somewhere with a higher minimum wage there could be exceptions to the local law this falls under.

It would get more complicated if you're an exempt salaried employee and this takes you below the level where you can be exempt but keeps you above minimum wage for 40hrs/week. They would have to make sure they're in compliance with regulations for hourly workers and I doubt they'd bother with that.

But, as others have said, unless you're desperate don't work for these assholes.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
472 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork

3627 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS