That annoys me, they lost because "might be AI" are you kidding me? The photo does not look AI to me at all. If the photo was edited through photoshop or went through an art program couldn't they have just asked for the original? That must've been infuriating.
Nothing about that looks like AI to me, beyond the uncanny valley feeling and the eerie lighting. The wallpaper and tile alone would be a big headache to get that consistent, especially with the mirror there. Same goes for the pattern on the clothes and the anatomy (hands, anyone?).
These people are scared of something they do not understand. It's not surprising that they also lack the technological skill to verify that the photo is real.
Also, the hands look normal.
AI can mostly do hands now
It's funny how you just tell the AI to not do bad hands and it mostly works.
Only after a second run through a hand-network (same with facial reconstruction and inverted faces)
Can they do complex mirror reflections like in the rejected photo though?
Yes.
Just check the mirrors man, perfect likeness. I don't think any genai is there yet.
Also if it is real, surely they can just prove it by sharing where the picture is taken?
Edit: apparently it was taken at a Gucci exhibition. Surely that's enough info to double check?
guardian? Naa - probably bullshit.
Why?
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed