667
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 232 points 1 year ago

Sofia Orr is likely to become the first woman since then to be jailed for refusing military service, but believes it is ‘wrong to take children and make them into soldiers’

And she's right.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Wow straight to jail with her!

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 99 points 1 year ago

Any government/country is actually just a kind of service (you pay taxes and get different goods from it). Every person should have the right to choose the provider of this service (change the country) or completely refrain from it. It means that mandatory military service is no less than slavery. People are not guilty for being born in a country they don't want to fight for (or that they don't want to fight at all)

[-] tillimarleen@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago

I think you are on the right track with your ideals of the world, but I also guess you kinda know that this is not how states operate. Of course there are different types of states, but if you think of democracies, they are also not service providers to their citizens. On the contrary. Democratic states are the abstraction of all the private interests of their citizens. This is what they protect and advance. What arises out of that is that occasionally these interests will suggest a war is what the nation desires.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I do not believe in "nation's interest". That's the thing that made USA an aggressive state. It also means that the minorities' opinions are completely rejected. And yk politicians often like to do what people didn't ask them to do. Democracy is good but the right of choosing the country and freely leaving one must always be there

[-] tillimarleen@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

yes, I also don‘t believe in the nation‘s interest, yet it somehow pretty brutally exists. Something‘s got to grow, somethings got to give.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

This is why promoting peace and good ideas is important. If the society is informed, it can change the situation

[-] tillimarleen@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

At first you got to have a good analysis of how society and the economy works. Unfortunately this already is a tricky thing, because not everybody agrees.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TheYang@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

You largely can choose the provider of this service, but they will also choose you (or not).
And you can not refrain from the service while being in the community of those that don't refrain. In practice there are (nearly) no places where the community as a whole chooses to refrain.

If you're in a country with compulsory military service, make yourself interesting for other countries and leave.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The current situation is not the best in my opinion. I think people who don't agree with it (like me) should try to change it if possible (peaceful ways are always preferred) instead of adapting to the situation. Though everyone has the right not to fight and not to do anything at all. I'm not saying that fighting the regime you don't like is mandatory

[-] peto@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Eh... Close, but they are also a concentration social power (and fundamentally deferred violence), and rights only really exist in the context of social power. You can try and establish your own personal sovereignty but you can be sure that any state that cares to will test that. Sometimes the most you can do is accept that it is able to imprison you or go down fighting, and if you are committed to pacifism the latter is a harder option.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fighting is the last option. It's needed when a state becomes usurpated and (unpopular opinion) when the current situation creates an objective high risk for the society or its part and waiting for the election is not really an option (such risk can be exhibited as genocide, severe discrimination or just as creation of a good environment for spreading aggressive ideas. All are dangerous). I think the best thing to do in a democratic society is trying to promote ideas which you think are right so people who agree can join you and you all can have a bigger influence on elections and people who aren't sure about their views can also find yours appealing. Leave the enforcement part for people who really know what they're doing and who you're sure are doing it for the higher good

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

No don't like this. Countries aren't corporations. Last time we tried that it was called fascism.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago

KEEP IT UP!

The Israeli prison system is already overflowing because of the war. Make it flow over even worse.

As of last week, the number of prisoners in Israeli jails numbered some 19,372, an increase of over 3,000 since October and significantly more than the maximum prison population of 14,500 mandated by law.

(I'm quoting Times of Israel but I don't want to link them in any form, you can find that if you want to.)

Here's another figured from them

Amid the war in the Gaza Strip, the IDF has called up a total of 287,000 reservists

The total prison capacity is 14.500, and it's already overflowing.

Even if every 50th IDF reservist or conscript refuses to go, it's still 6000 people more for them to deal with. If every tenth conscript/reservist refused, it'd be twice the total prison capacity on top of the already problematically overflowing prisons.

Swamp the system.

So even a tiny majority refusing to go and instead choosing prison over participating in genocide can have a huge impact, indirectly.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago

I think refusers go to military prison, not regular prison.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well at least here in Finland, where we also have conscription, you go to a normal prison and serve six months (or at least it used to be 6months, the same as the shortest conscription time). And I'd like to note that there are several options for conscription. Full military service, unarmed military service (you serve in the military but don't have to touch weapons, you'll be a backline logistics guy or some such) and civil service, which is a bit longer, but you never serve in the military (essentially you work in an old people's home or something for 13 months).

For one, we don't have a "military prison", as that's an actual prison operated by the military. Israel does have them though. Or one with several detention centers.

Secondly, because when conscripts refuse conscription, they're still civilians, as they've not been conscripted.

This one was about a reservist, so it's probably different.

However, going by the stats on...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_military_prison

... I think the numbers might've been in the figures I mentioned (compare the occupancy numbers) and because a lot of the prisoners were prisoners of war, who go to these military prisons.

My point is that while a majority opposition to the war seems unlikely, getting 1/10th, 1/20th, or even 1/50th (=2%) of people refusing like the brave woman in the article, there'd be massive issues for the Israeli prison system.

They already started trying to lift regulations of the conditions in the prisons, so they could shove them even fuller.

Well I'll forgo my dislike of linking this bullshit "news source", so we can all be on the same page, more or less.. No pun intended.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/jails-running-out-of-room-due-to-war-prison-service-warns/

Eighty-four percent of those classified as security prisoners are currently living in an area of under three square meters in size, less than the legal limit, and 3,000 prisoners are now sleeping on mattresses on the floor rather than in beds.

This situation is potentially dangerous and “my biggest fear is that we will lose control over the prisoners in the prisons,” committee chairman MK Zvika Fogel (Otzma Yehudit) warned

They fear the exact problem I'm proposing would be easy-ish to exacerbate.

Last month [Nov -23], in the wake of Hamas’s devastating assault on southern Israel, lawmakers passed a bill allowing the government to declare an “incarceration emergency,” paving the way for the temporary lifting of restrictions on housing conditions for prisoners.

And another article from December:

https://www.timesofisrael.com/knesset-extends-israels-incarceration-emergency-as-prisons-near-capacity/

##Knesset extends Israel’s ‘incarceration emergency’ as prisons near capacity

According to the Israel Prison Service, 19,756 people are currently held in Israeli jails and 'within a week or two, we will reach the maximum capacity for prisoners'

They mention the max capacity as 20,000.

And these must be military prisons as well, since I don't think POW's or "security prisoners" would be held in normal prisons.

He added that some 88% of Palestinian prisoners held for terror offenses — commonly known as security prisoners, are living in spaces of “less than three square meters per prisoner.”

Some genocidal right-wing zionist maniac then went on to say how these conditions are "a summer camp" and how "Hamas killers must be kept in the lowest conditions the law allows".

And this is following a security prisoner getting a beat to death.

Anyway thanks for coming to my TED-rant.

[-] FreeFacts@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

Well at least here in Finland, where we also have conscription, you go to a normal prison and serve six months (or at least it used to be 6months, the same as the shortest conscription time).

That hasn't been the case for ages in Finland. These days you get 6 months of "house arrest" if you refuse conscription. Electronic tagging that is. You are allowed to leave your house to go to the grocery store, to work or to study etc at predetermined and agreed upon times.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Oh man. Totaalikieltäytyminen is so easy nowadays, god damn.

I served II/09 so it's been a while.

Thanks for the info. Guess the mad bastards managed it then, because I did hang around totari people as well, and that's where I actually learned this idea. Because he had counted prison capacity in Finland and it was something like 1-3% of every batch who would need to say "nope" and they just wouldn't fit into prison anymore.

I really would like to know the details of when this was on the board being discussed.

First good news I've heard today, ty man.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Which aren't equipped to handle a significant enough mass influx of people refusing to participate in a genocide either.

[-] 3volver@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

She has actual courage. Just simply doing what you're told without question makes you as weak as the rest.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Based. Maybe she can get political asylum from Fascism.

Refusing to be complicit in Genocide? Believe it or not, Jail.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

When the world is run by criminals, being lawful is made a crime.

[-] FoxBJK@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago

Paywall. There are deferments you can get so you don’t have to fight. What’s the full story here?

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 33 points 1 year ago

Concientious objectors are jailed in Israel. This isn't anything new, see here for another case https://www.amnesty.org.uk/urgent-actions/conscientious-objector-detained-israel

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Conscientious objectors are not jailed.

Anyone can just do community service roles instead of the military. Sounds like only people who completely refuse to help out at all are punished.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherut_Leumi

Sherut Leumi (Hebrew: שירות לאומי, lit. 'National Service') is an alternative voluntary form of national service in Israel, as opposed to the mandatory military conscription prevalent in the country. It is designed for individuals who do not meet the eligibility criteria for service in the Israel Defense Forces, or who hold conscientious objections to military enlistment. The program primarily was created for religious Jewish girls aged 17 to 24, although it is open to all applicants who cite diverse grounds for their decision.

The majority work in schools, but can also work in places such as special education, administration, hospitals,[3] law, geriatrics, nursing homes, health clinics, teens at risk, internal security, disadvantaged communities, immigrant assistance, and many other organizations. Acceptance is based on an interview via a placement organizations that try to find the youth appropriate skills, interests, and needs.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Although the Israeli army’s Conscience Committee can decide to allow exemption from military service, this is usually granted only to those conscientious objectors who refuse to serve on religious grounds. However, according to the UN Human Rights Committee, no discrimination is permitted “among conscientious objectors on the basis of the nature of their particular beliefs” - i.e. whether they are religious or otherwise. Even though Israeli law does allow for exemption on grounds of pacifism, the army’s Conscience Committee frequently rejects pacifists' cases. The authorities deny objectors the possibility of performing alternative civilian service. Conscientious objectors in Israel can be convicted of and imprisoned for the same “offence” repeatedly. In 2003, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention said that this practice flouts the rights of conscientious objectors under international human rights standards which prohibit “double jeopardy”.

Your point was already refuted in the article from amnesty I linked.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Hasn't it always been young people who make the bulk of the armies?

[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Israelis have had conscription for years.

Suddenly she sees what the fuck is going on when some skin is required to play the game.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

IDF Females don't get put in combat roles.

She could have nodded her head and be complicit in Genocide behind a desk.

But she'd rather be in Prison than do the Holocaust.

[-] HowMany@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry. Choose your governments carefully.

[-] Templa@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Well, she's certainly part of a minority. The majority of the political parties in Israel are extremely right-wing, not much choice there.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know why this is even news. She maintains that viewpoint when she gets out then she is going back to jail.

Either way, this story is one of laziness and entitlement. She wants the comfort of living where she does without having to do what others have done before her to get that level of comfort. She isn't doing this in protest of what is happening in Gaza, she just doesn't want to be in the army.

[-] chaonaut@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, yes, the "laziness and entitlement" of risking becoming a political prisoner for checks notes not wanting to participate in a plausible genocide. Clearly, political prisoners and genocides have nothing to do with Israel.

[-] SirSmokeAlot@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

This is either a really bad take or straight up Israeli propaganda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it 14 points 1 year ago

"Lazyness and entitlement" is a weird way of spelling "doesn't want to contribute to mass murder of civilians"

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
667 points (100.0% liked)

World News

36879 readers
934 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS