31

Lynch says that his 'number one priority' is getting the Tories out and that, realistically, that means putting Starmer in:

“That doesn’t mean that we give him carte blanche or a blank cheque to do whatever he likes.”

“I support getting rid of this government and I’m a realist – the only government we’re going to get as an alternative will be led by Keir Starmer, so people have to deal with that, people have got to grow up a bit in some senses.

“That’s the government we’re going to get and we have to make the best of that opportunity.”

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Squeezer@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

He’s right. Get rid of the Tories, then apply pressure to Labour. It’s the only viable option. If anyone has any suggestions on a realistic alternative I’d love to hear it.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 18 points 8 months ago

There isn't a realistic alternative. But you don't have to pretend you like it. It is important to make it very clear that you do not. The least worst option is not going to evolve into a better option all of its own accord.

Lynch is saying you have to vote to keep the Tories out and you have to hold Labour's feet to the fire afterwards.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago

Pressure Labour to back LD on non FPTP voting and then turn up the pressure when they're in so that the elections are at least remotely less "pick the big guy you hate the least"

[-] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago

This is my feeling on things. Get labouring. Then turn the screws. Get a 3rd party into a position where labour could face an existential threat under FPTP, and use that to drive a better voting system.

I want to see a parliament made up of many smaller parties making compromises and concessions, rather than a block just whipping through what they can get away with.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I want something similar in the US, what I picture is multi seat districts elected through STAR voting, and a shitload more seats than there currently are.

I picture a well secured network being used to facilitate a system where the districts have congress critters who act as PR at home while their colleagues go to participate in the nationally held debates, with everyone being able to cast their votes in favor or against a bill either in person or at a distance.

Then again I'm also a weirdo who thinks it'd be dope to replace the current capital district with a blended architecture Grecco-Roman flavoured Haudenosaunee Longhouse design wrapped around a shrunk down version of the X-Seed 4000 plans, so maybe my ideas need a bit more outside contribution lol

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3073 readers
87 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS