361
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago

The cruise line is concerned about sustainability. That's rich.

[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago

The whole idea of the article is pr marketing by the cruise ship, lol.

[-] Pips@lemmy.film 6 points 1 year ago

Their comments are PR mitigation. Pulling up to the whale butchering was definitely not a PR stunt.

[-] maporita@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

The cruise line is concerned about upsetting their passengers, that is all.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

Sustainability of the things that entertain their passengers so the cruise line can continue to make more money.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago

Yes, it is rich. Rich people pretending to be responsible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Yoruio@lemmy.ca 120 points 1 year ago

Hunting and killing methods have been improved to ensure as little harm to the whales as possible.

Apart from the ... hunting and the killing.

[-] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 year ago

Why even hunt whales in the first place? Sure, it's one big food source when you snag one, but people who have tried whale say it's bland and uninteresting. It's just a bunch of fat. And it takes a lot of effort to kill it, haul it, parse it out, etc.

Fish farms give you much more good quality meat without all of the species endangerment.

[-] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 35 points 1 year ago

Tradition, one of the worst reasons on earth to do anything.

[-] Pips@lemmy.film 18 points 1 year ago

There are certain very small remote communities in the far north that are isolated and hard to reach. Whale and seal hunting provides a guaranteed food source for these small communities so that they don't have to depend on incredibly expensive (both resource and moneywise) imports. The Faroe Islands is not one of those places because obviously a cruise ship can easily get to it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Cow_says_moo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It's definitely not just fatty and bland. I've had it on Svalbard, where there's no farming or husbandry going on because it's too far up north.

Whale tastes a lot like beef, so yeah, might as well have that instead.

[-] snek_boi@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Plus the article itself talks about the mercury poisoning risks associated with eating whales and dolphins.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Yes, this whale has been killed in a perfectly harmless way

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

We just line them up against the wall and shoot them in the blowhole. It's the most humane way, really. /s

[-] Wats0ns@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, this whale has been killed in a perfectly harmless way

[-] brihuang95@sopuli.xyz 105 points 1 year ago

Jesus lol this almost sounds like a south park episode

[-] FirstWizardZorander@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Southpark predicted this timeline

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spacebar@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

Cruiselines should stop going to Faroe until the hunts stop, or the cruiselines should shut the f up. Its just lip service without tangible action.

[-] kicksystem@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Cruiselines should f off anyway, because we're at the start of an ever growing climate crisis and cruise ships are the worst carbon emitters of all passenger transports. Those meat eating hypocrites aboard need a lesson in how we treat animals and the planet these days.

[-] DeadGemini@waveform.social 12 points 1 year ago

meat eating hypocrites

Oh brother, here we go with the malnourished vegans again...I'm with you on the "fuck off cruiselines" bit, but for fucks sake...

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean it's partly the passengers desires that lead them there, cruise lines don't just pick arbitrary ports, they go where people want.

They shouldn't have apologized at all, they should have just been like "and this is what Faroe is like at this time of year, you're welcome that we were able to show you this unique experience"

[-] LostCause@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In completely unrelated news, some whales seem to be attacking boats/yachts. How weird! Why could this be?

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Are you talking about the orcas that are doing it apparently for shits and giggles or is there bigger underwater uprising on the way?

[-] coldv@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago
[-] FARTYSHARTBLAST@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Been a lot of shark attacks in the news too, that checks out...

[-] LostCause@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well yeah that is what I was talking about, though the articles I saw didn‘t mention any reason at all and if they had said "shits and giggles" I‘d be even more sceptical of that, since I don‘t think animals really fight without a reason.

Now here is where we get to my wild conspiracy theory, I think aquatic species may not like boats, who they can see killing their species or hunting their food sources. Then they react to a predator, so either they flee or attack. Orcas being some of the bigger ones are probably the few who stand any chance whatsoever fighting, so they might try sometimes.

Edit: Ok I just googled around and saw the articles you mentioned saying they do it for fun, I also found this: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/11/the-orca-uprising-whales-are-ramming-boats-but-are-they-inspired-by-revenge-grief-or-memory

Which made me feel a bit more like at least I‘m not the only one who sees this possibility and also gave me more of an idea of why I might want to see this so much (I think there is an injustice happening).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Mister Nimbus has had enough!

[-] LollerCorleone@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

For a moment I thought the whales were somehow killed by the cruise ship..

[-] zainitopia@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

thats honestly what I thought too lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] b000urns@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, the cruise ship and its inhabitants are "guests" so I'm not sure where they get off telling the locals what to do?

While I certainly don't condone hunting and killing whales (I also don't eat meat for the same reasons, ie. animals shouldn't have to suffer just so they can tantalize our taste buds), if these are local customs and it's not harming the environment then maybe people shouldn't be all high-and-mighty about it. Especially if they are chowing down on veal, lamb, or any meat for their meals.

Considering where these people live, I'm guessing historically speaking being fully vegetarian may not have been an option, so I wouldn't really judge them too harshly for customs that were likely built around survival as much as anything else. But maybe I'm off base, just guessing really.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, if the people on the cruise genuinely cared about the environment, they wouldn't be on a cruise, it's one of the most polluting ways to see the world, it not only directly hurts the ocean and everything in it, and everyone who depends on it (and not many people actually do any more, and like you say, most of those on board are probably eating animals), but the air too, and in a potential shift to battery powered ships, whatever damage making those causes, as well as other shit like by bringing covid to islands.

Blaming the destruction of the ocean on islanders sustaining themselves and not on the companies dumping garbage and pouring sewage and oil and god knows what else in to the sea, and the people who literally profit from dong that (like from them, on the cruise), is quite foul.

[-] slug@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

i agree. some values are universal, like what should be considered cruel, but slaughtering pigs is pretty cruel too (i eat them anyways!). to me, what's funny here is how privileged first world people just hate to see how the hot dog is made, so to speak.

it's like privileged people hating to simply see homeless people in cities even though the system that makes people homeless is necessary to keep the high property values that they benefit from. the mere witness of the cruelty we benefit from in modern society makes the privileged one feel like a victim.

[-] b000urns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Indeed. The reason hunting whales etc. could be seen as unethical is because we were driving them to extinction, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Any other lines that people draw for themselves about what animals we should / shouldn't eat is completely arbitrary.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I'm a vegan but I don't bother telling you bloodmouths what I really think of you. It won't change your mind and will only make me frustrated if I let myself give a shit.

Mockery is much better than outrage.

[-] Cow_says_moo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm on the Faroe islands right now. This isn't exactly a climate or geology fit for large scale farming, so you're right in that being a vegetarian would have been rough here. Even now quality veggies seem hard to find in the small villages. Everything needs to be imported.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Relo@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

Great news if you hate people who go on cruises AND whales 👍

[-] ArcticPrincess@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I read this as:

Wealthy, coddled city-dwellers---for each of whom thousands of animals, bred for fatness and compliance, are raised in factories and systematically slaughtered---upset to witness sustainable, traditional harvest practices. Floating corporate safety bubble apologises for failing to protect their naivete.

[-] DonJefe@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I thought whales were protected. I'm guessing just a few species are protected, and those were not. Sad

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Not saying I approve, but there's carve outs when the whaling is part of a local tradition. Also, Pilot Whales are in the Least Concern category, so they're not going extinct from this.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

They shouldn't have apologized at all. Should have just said something akin to: "This is Faroe at this time of year, you're lucky we were able to arrive in time to witness this unique experience"... passengers can make up their mind if they still want that as a port.

[-] Raphael@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Laws only apply when you're poor. Poor people don't travel in cruises.

[-] freeman@lemmy.pub 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Protection only goes so far and is basically in enforced since no one is going to be willing to go to war to enforce these regs. Look at what the Japanese do.. These hunts also use boats to herd them into inlets that are not in international waters for slaughter.

Additionally the folks in the Faroe Islands may have some type of exemption for certain things as they consider whaling a part of their culture/cultural traditions.

[-] socsa@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Faroe also hunts puffins. Puffins are best bird. There's literally no reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Caithe@lemdit.com 12 points 1 year ago

Jesus. This sounds like it came straight from the Onion

[-] blazera@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

The people killin the whales sure aint gonna apologize for it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
361 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32287 readers
372 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS