183
submitted 8 months ago by Billy@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/world@lemmy.world
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zellith@kbin.social 42 points 8 months ago

Maybe we should send Iran hundreds of ballistic missiles.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Didn't we already do that back in the 80's? Konami made a game about it.

[-] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago

Maybe they send some back

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 3 points 8 months ago

Once they get nukes it will be too late anyway.

[-] Cinner@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Once they do? Stuxnet was what, 2010? And because of the coding error that caused it to spread outside the enrichment plant it was found out and only set them back something like 2 years.

From AP:

Iran, after the collapse of its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, has pursued nuclear enrichment just below weapons-grade levels. Tehran has accumulated enough enriched uranium to build several weapons if it chooses. However, U.S. intelligence agencies and others assess that Iran has yet to begin a weapons program.

Iran is “presenting a face which is not entirely transparent when it comes to its nuclear activities. Of course this increases dangers,” Grossi said. “There’s loose talk about nuclear weapons more and more, including in Iran recently.

Since 2022, Iranian officials have spoken openly about something long denied by Tehran as it enriches uranium at its closest-ever levels to weapons-grade material: the Islamic Republic is ready to build an atomic weapon at will. That includes Kamal Kharrazi, an adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who told Al Jazeera that Tehran has the ability to build nuclear weapons but does not intend to do so.

[-] RemembertheApollo@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

But according to Putin Russia is an awesome place. How could they need assistance with military hardware from Iran?

[-] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Why Israel does then?

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

six sources told Reuters

None of who are named or verified

[-] xor 12 points 8 months ago

Not named != not verified

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

Most reputable news orgs (of which Reuters is up there as one of the best) would not be reporting unless they were confident their sources are telling the truth. The sources may not be named because as a journalist at times you can't betray your sources trust in confidentiality

[-] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Reuters is a corporate news organization, and much like AP and AFP, they only tell you what they want you to know. Their mantra is; "We don't simply report the news, we influence they people feel about it." A Reuters employee who does not want to be named told me.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Western media outlet makes claim against country they want to demonize using...

anonymous sources!

More news at 11! (don't ask for evidence)

[-] digitaldingus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Gotta keep the war machine going strong.

I'm fascinated by no peace talks. It's like the world is just fine with this Vietnam repeat.

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
183 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2673 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS