179
top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

While some Republicans are decrying this, do not forget that Donald Trump had Nick Fuentes at Mar-A-Lago (with Kanye)

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These groups don't even give a shit about their conference. These articles about the controversy are the entire reason they do this. I'd say 'stop giving them exactly what they want ever time they do this', but that will never happen.

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I've heard plenty from Republicans that also dislike this. The GOP is absolutely broken into two groups and they hate each other. At some point one side will form a third party or just disappear.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They hate each other right up until election day when they all fall in line together.

Don't let Republican hand-wringing over other Republicans fool you. They still have a common enemy to unite them- the fear of anyone except Republicans having power.

[-] jdsquared@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I mean I understand the truth in this but look at the Georgia results in 2020. Biden won the state even though a lot of other Republicans got more votes than Trump. There wasn't a down ticket effect for democrats, a lot of Republicans just left it blank instead of voting for Trump.

I'm not sure about other states, I live in Georgia so i was hyperaware about what was happening here.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The other way to look at that is that it took a man as shockingly vile as Trump to make them reconsider even one specific R for the presidency, but they still voted R the rest of the way down. Don't underestimate Republican commitment to voting Republican.

Also I think Biden's win in Georgia can be attributed more to increased voter turnout than a few Rs declining to vote for Trump.

[-] jdsquared@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah I brought in 6 new voters between the presidential and the runoffs for Warnock! I felt so useful.

[-] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That is pretty awesome. Getting more people to partiipcate matters more than almost anything else at this point.

[-] effingjoe@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 9 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=wCl33v5969M

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why does he still look like he's in prep school?

There's a painting of a 90-year-old Dachau camp guard aging in his attic, I just know it.

[-] thallamabond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe it has something to do with this.

https://www.newsweek.com/qanon-shaman-threatens-expose-false-prophet-republican-event-1812085

Here is one of Fuentes quotes: "I want a 16-year-old who is untouched, untouched, pristine, untouched, not corrupted, innocent,"

[-] adroidBalloon@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well, now i'm convinced that Fuentes met Dorian Grey in a Weimar Berlin gay bar, killed him, and stole his painting because the only thing in the article that defies belief is that Fuentes is 32.

[-] dub@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The GOP aren't sending their best

[-] Gellis12@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

They are though, and that's what's scary

[-] squidman64@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is a reference to former president Donald Trump saying most Mexican immigrants were criminals and rapists

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7764650-when-mexico-sends-its-people-they-re-not-sending-their-best

[-] Gellis12@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I know, but I still stand by what I said

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
179 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4211 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS