43
Imagine how much of a sociopath you'd have to be to think you can bring people to your side by harassing preschoolers; that's a Westboro Baptist Church level of being out of touch with humanity.
While also bringing your own kid named.. checks notes .. Kayden. Of course the kid’s name is fucking Kayden…
Lets go yell at Kayden for his parents choices!
Nah the kid is a victim here as well, he didn’t choose to be named Kayden, it’s just another artifact of his parents’ poor judgement.
Westboro Baptist Church level of being out of touch with humanity.
Nahhhhh. Westboro are antisemitic, homophobic, Islamophobic, and generally a hate group. This is just protesting. You don't get to help blow up families and claim your family is suppose to be shielded from it
If your going to be harassed for anything, actively supporting a genocide seems like a good reason. Sorry I won't be clutching my pearls on this one.
Blinken's 3-year-old and 4-year-old have absolutely no culpability when it comes to genocide.
Agreed.
Neither do the dead Palestinian kids.
But that was no reason to lay off. “Entire neighborhoods have been bombed to the ground with children missing under rubble,” Hazami Barmada, the encampment’s organizer, told me. “Why are those children forced to understand the brutal, barbaric realities of war, when his children should be sanitized from it?”
Terrorizing children is fucked. So is killing them. And so is perpetuating that kind of sick genocidal violence as a government official while ignoring one's own citizens.
This idea that protest has to be polite and contained is ...unhelpful. Those in power want protests that can be ignored.
All this awful shit being done by powerful people in the world all over... and the rest of us are totally powerless to do anything. I'm not surprised to see protesters taking more extreme measures.
When trying to stop genocide, what's a step too far?
I'm fairly certain that the step exists, but I'm fairly certain that the step is pretty far from here.
Attacking somebody's toddlers is such a powerful move /SARCASM
I think that way of thinking is why it is so difficult to deal with colonialism. We can commit atrocities, and as long at the people who committed them have died of old age, their descendants are free and clear. I don't really know where ixstand on this. But I can't not acknowledge that I have benefited from the misery of others. Whether it is slave wage labor, the crimes against indigenous peoples, patriarchy, or these proxy wars around the world. I think that pushing back against these injustices when seeing the harm it is causes makes obvious sense. But I think it also makes sense to do it selfishly. These people are making us culpable. Doesn't matter if it was someone we voted for who made these decisions, or even if it's someone we didn't vote for. These decisions are being made in our names and with our money. Idk man. Shit's complicated
I suspect that if protesters camped outside of my house and screamed at my young children about my actions, I would reflexively oppose whatever they were advocating for. I just can't see this being an effective tactic for ending the war in Gaza.
But, I'm not Bliken who is not a politican but an experienced diplomat.
It's easy to see why the right enjoys "owning the libs" so much. The left includes many people who are so bad at persuasion or making points that it can drive people who otherwise support what they are trying to push to hate them.
Though it's dangerous to actually change your stance based on actions of some who apparently support something, because that opens up the possibly of the opponents hiring people to protest in bad taste like this specifically to drive opposition.
Please don't help. Because you aren't.
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19097 readers
2609 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS