146
submitted 1 year ago by tet@lemm.ee to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Fedora's bootloader sucks, I want to use SDBoot but it's set up so weirdly that installing it would break the install.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Arch install script could be better. The dedicated /home partition is a pain if you don't know what you're doing (I don't know what I'm doing). The encryption thing also breaks a lot of things.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] savvywolf@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago

Mint - Firstly Wayland support, but that's been said before.

But one small annoyance is that they ship with a version of synaptic in the repos that doesn't allow software upgrades. The reason for this is that they want you to go through their update manager (which doesn't work for me, but eh). But seriously, for an OS and ecosystem which is supposed to be pro-user agency, why arbitrarily restrict people like that? I end up having to pin a specific version of it.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Package manager like yay for the community packages of openSuse tumbleweed.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wish Debian had better support for software that wants to do its own package management.

They do it a little bit with python, but for most things it's either "stay within the wonderful Debian package management but then find out that the node thing you want to do is functionally impossible" or "abandon apt for a mismashed patchwork of randomly-placed and haphazardly-secured independently downloaded little mini-repos for Node, python, maybe some Docker containers, Composer, snap, some stuff that wants you to just wget a shell script and pipe it to sudo sh, and God help you, Nvidia drivers. At least libc6 is secure though."

I wish that there was a big multiarch-style push to acknowledge that lots of things want to do their own little package management now, and that's okay, and somehow bring it into the fold (again their pyenv handling seems like a pretty good example of how it can be done in a mutually-working way) so it's harmonious with the packaging system instead of existing as something of an opponent to it. Maybe this already exists and I'm not aware of it but if it exists I'm not aware of it.

[-] xilliah@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PopOs

Not have 10s of GBs of updates every week. I mean seriously wtf.

[-] tiny@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Have A zsh shell with fzf history and zsh syntax highlighting installed

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Like u/lukmyly013 said, I'd love an official KDE version to mint. It isn't that hard to get going, and I like cinnamon well enough on most things, but there are a few situations where I'd like to have plasma out of the box

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deczzz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

LinuxMint

  • Stop crashing when I log in after standby
  • Weird graphical glitches
  • The WiFi manager. Trying to connect to work WiFi but I then have to fill in info on certificates, protocols and what not. Stuff I don't understand, don't experience on Mac/windows and don't want to know about.
  • At least try to make an interesting package manager/store. How about some screenshots and icons?
[-] socphoenix@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

I would want a FreeBSD type of packaging system where system libraries and apps are different. Their binary packages are separated into quarterly and latest so you get a very stable OS but either Debian or arch style package updates.

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I wish Ubuntu was just xUbuntu by default and that xfce didn’t have like 4 different settings menus for no reason. I’d also like it if there was a minimalist icon theme by default, and a dock like old school vanilla Ubuntu.

Oh and better multi monitor support

[-] Redoomed@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

For Fedora, replace the current installer (Anaconda) with the openSUSE Tumbleweed installer.

One of the aspects I love about the openSUSE TW installer is the ability to remove groups of packages for the initial install. This is particularly useful if you never use certain programs or intend to replace them with the Flatpak version.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

The everything ISO is more granular, but not to the point of openSUSE. Way back in the day you could mess with package selections in depth.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Stop using stupid adjective/animal for release names. When editing an apt list I don't want to have to lookup "which release was 'xenial'?" Just use the yy.mm format.

load more comments (2 replies)

pacman would allow me to install weak dependencies with a simple command-line option rather than black magic wizardry that rivals ffmpeg filtergraphs.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] clemdemort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I wish arch had proper printing support, I've never ever been able to get it to work no matter how much I RTFM. I think it should be something you choose at install or that you could set up in an automated fashion.

[-] ccdfa@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

CUPS? Use the localhost webpage to configure

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Nothing. Artix gives me all the freedoms.

[-] NekkoDroid@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arch: Move more of the things shipped by the distro to /usr/, too many things are still in /etc/, /var/ and /srv/. Generally this isn't a problem, but when you want to make an A/B updated image where only /usr/ is shipped it is a bit annoying. Also, bash has no way to have a "distro" version of /etc/profile.

Another benefit is: no .pacnew files in /etc/ (or anywhere else) since those would all be managed by the system maintainer and aren't touched by the package manager

[-] Matt@lemdro.id 4 points 1 year ago

I wish Debian had a version with more recent software that is suitable for regular use. I know many people use Testing and Sid, but Testing often has delayed security updates and it’s not unusual for Sid to break. And both get weird around the freeze for the next release. It would be great if there was a version like Tumbleweed that was constantly rolling and received automated testing to prevent many of the problems Unstable experiences.

I currently use Tumbleweed on my computers and Debian on my servers, but I would love to use Debian on everything.

[-] ipacialsection@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Debian needs a better installer. It'd be awesome if it had something more akin to Fedora/RHEL's Anaconda, or even just made Calamares the default (so long as it didn't install every single locale available like their live inages currently do).

[-] beirdobaggins@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Every distro with gnome.

Make RDP work as well as it does on Windows.

I'm talking about remoting into the Linux system.

Everytime the system is restarted you have to physically login to the system to unlock the keyring so that your RDP password is accessible or you won't be able to get in. Or you have to remove your keyring password all together. Why is this different than the regular user password?

Also it's weird that it works like VNC where you are controlling the system remotely but anyone local can see what you are doing on the screen. It is also cool to have that option but it shouldn't be the default.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EponymousBosh@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Bring back Linux Mint KDE

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

55982 readers
573 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS