67
Why I prefer Linux (lemmy.world)

Brand new, out of the box. It's been sitting here at 100% for 5 minutes.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 12 points 1 year ago

Half the time when i update on linux, less space is used by the updates..

Total update size: -56mb.

Beat that, windoze.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ubuntu: please restart to finalise the update.

Firefox: please restart Firefox as it has been updated.

[-] zaph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The problem isn't necessarily the restart itself. It's the frequency and amount of time windows spends at 0 and 100% before finally doing something and the amount of times I get frustrated and just pull power.

[-] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

I also hate that Firefox does it, and at least it doesn't "Please wait, we're running du bs=8g if=/dev/random of=/hello" every time

[-] shadowfly@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Arch: 30sec for update, 2min for full system upgrade

Kubuntu: 2min for update, 10min for full system upgrade

Windows: 5min for update, 30min for full system upgrade

Ubuntu: Please close firefox so i can install update. You closed it? Well... the update can wait.

Gentoo: πŸ’€

[-] hillosipuli@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Atleast gentoo updates only when i tell it to!

[-] the_seven_sins@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Can somebody explain why Windows is so much slower than... basically every other OS? I mean, what does Windows-Update differently then a apt-get upgrade?

[-] denissimo@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Windows updates are kind of snapshots, they replace more files than necessary and keep the old files incase the update fails or you wish to roll back x update. Besides that you're also given new packages and features you never asked for, because Windows loves their guinea pigs and doesn't care if something breaks because of it.

[-] idoubledo@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

AFAIK the main reason is in how windows handles the filesystem - in linux everything is a file and all files are cached by default unless that memory is needed by default, so 100% memory utilization is the norm and where Linux operates most efficiently. In windows file caching seems architecturally be an after-thought and much less efficient - i.e. this causes handling a lot of files (like when updating the OS, where a lot of files need to be modified) to break the caching system and cause a lot of cache thrashing.

[-] FUsername@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

While I'm unsure of the actual reasons, the file system alone seems too be a pain.

[-] Simplesyrup@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Everytime I boot into win just to play my ONE vr game it always pesters me about an update fricking windows takes up 100GIB to function wtf, and only ubuntu requires 20, will all my apps installed gahh

[-] denissimo@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

you would think that the death of hdd makes windows updates bearable and this shows. manufacturers still find a way to budget the SSD so much that you want to install Linux either way. like not too long ago i got a wd blue and it's slower than expected. no problem with Fedora though :D

[-] fedops@fosstodon.org 7 points 1 year ago

@denissimo the past 30 years have been a consistent arms race between h/w manufacturers producing ever faster hardware and windows slowing it down to never-before seen levels.

Good for us, bad for them. πŸ‘
@Techiemoore

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmasterrace

43 readers
1 users here now

A community for Linux enthusiasts.

May your htop stats be low and your beard grow long

Welcome to !linuxmasterrace@feddit.de former r/linuxmasterrace members and existing Lemmyverse citizens: Feel free to join the newly created !linuxmasterrace@feddit.de community.

Let’s make the full transition to the decentralized Fediverse!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS