553
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] S0UPernova@lemmy.world 66 points 7 months ago

Isn't saying FOSS software like sayimg ATM machine.

[-] xedrak@kbin.social 57 points 7 months ago

I’m going to need you to remove this comment ASAP as possible.

[-] Dagnet@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago
[-] SaltyIceteaMaker@iusearchlinux.fyi 18 points 7 months ago

Gonna steal your pin number

[-] nickhammes@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

And export it in PDF format!

[-] odium@programming.dev 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Which I could save in my PC computer

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 5 points 7 months ago

If the HDD drive wasn't already full of EDM music.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago
[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 14 points 7 months ago

The extra S is for SWW

[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 7 months ago

It’s called “redundant acronym syndrome”, or “RAS syndrome” for short.

[-] cupcakezealot 37 points 7 months ago

using foss operating systems and installing lots of spyware and proprietary software on it double finger guns

[-] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Who would do such a thing? side-eyes Discord, Spotify, Bitwig, Steam, VS Code, Sublime, etc. on my taskbar

[-] Lime66@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

*Clones vscode source and packages it using electron

[-] Barometer3689@feddit.nl 20 points 7 months ago

Like all cases, it depends. I use both foss and proprietary software. I always checkout foss first when needing new software.

[-] odium@programming.dev 16 points 7 months ago
[-] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

Do the *ladder.

It's like a dance move. Climbing motion.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 11 points 7 months ago

FOSS is sometimes less secure, because it builds on the fact that the user is also a contributor, not all decisions are premade and there is a ton of freedom.

Take Android or iOS for example, both are pretty much equally secure and both are very freedom restricting.

These are core architecture advantages like

  • encrypted user accounts
  • the system actually using the secure element
  • monopole allowing them to enforce a mostly opt-in permission model
  • apps need to comply or they dont exist

Android is still mostly Open source but it isnt really free from the user perspective. This is not really the purpose of FOSS tbh, but FOSS software is often very configurable, allows replacing stuff, using what you want, which increases attack surface a lot.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 7 months ago

It's funny how people forget games are software.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

I honestly would rather use Chrome os over Windows if I had to choose spyware

[-] Adanisi@lemmy.zip 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If you have to choose spyware there really are no good options. But Chromebooks do generally tend to have good GNU/Linux hardware support. So I see your point, as you could replace it with a libre system.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Honestly the UI design is really though out. If I didn't care about the anti features I'd be down to use it.

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
553 points (100.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20774 readers
471 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS