401
submitted 9 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Cruz told POLITICO that his amendment is about ensuring that political VIPs aren’t endangered as they pass through public spaces in airports.

Viral photos of politicians jetting off to a tropical hideaway during a deadly cold wave might become a lot rarer under legislation being pushed by Sen. Ted Cruz.

The Texas Republican — infamously photographed by a gawker while en route to Cancún in 2021 — is proposing a bill amendment that would offer lawmakers a dedicated security escort at airports, along with expedited screening outside of public view. That could make it much less likely that the politicians’ comings and goings would become fodder for embarrassing news reports and late-night comedy mockery.

The measure would also provide the same special treatment to federal judges and Cabinet members, as well as a limited number of their family and staff. Cruz is trying to attach the amendment to a major aviation policy bill, S. 1939, that is expected to be marked up in the Senate Commerce Committee on Thursday.

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

No fucking way. Power to the people

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

Ted will have to fund the security guard's ticket to Cancun.

[-] penquin@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

Mr. Weasley voice, my friend. If you were a good human being, you wouldn't have worried about this. Kindly, go get fucked.

[-] mspencer712@programming.dev 4 points 9 months ago

This makes me uneasy. The Cancun thing makes me want to be opposed to this as well, in a general “Internet wants you to feel things” way.

But these people aren’t idiots. (Sure they victimize and weaponize useful idiots, but they themselves are very clever.) Are they planning to have politicians taken out by useful terrorists, and want to avoid passing of reasonable legislation - so they strategically propose unreasonable legislation to poison the whole idea?

It’s never as simple as a few paragraphs make it sound. I think a wait-and-form-opinions-later approach is a reasonable one.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

If I thought the job were that important I would agree.

But it’s not, and if you’re so hated by the people you represent that you feel like you should be treated differently than everyone else maybe you’re in the wrong job.

They aren’t royalty.

[-] waysideollie@mastodon.sdf.org 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

@MicroWave It must be soooo hard to be a white, cis male trying to travel without getting harassed. #civil_rights #TedCruz

[-] Nomad@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

Just strike the word security from the title and enjoy the implication.

[-] artisanrox@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Absolutely fcuk these righties continually trying to separate themselves from the "bourgeoisie" they hate so much.

🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

So I'm supposed to pay for this man's private security cuz he's scared of actually facing his constituents?

[-] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Better idea: It should be illegal for politicians to hire bodyguards or be protected by police or military.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
401 points (100.0% liked)

News

23320 readers
2957 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS