180
submitted 9 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 36 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

They are losing a surprising amount of senior officers.

[-] GONADS125@feddit.de 18 points 9 months ago

I was just thinking I want a list of russia's senior officers with the dead scratched out for visual representation. Their losses are insane..

I was just thinking about the Iraqi Most Wanted playing cards given to US troops, and that if there was one for russia, I feel like half the deck would be dead officers by now.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not a visual representation but there is a list on Wikipedia of Russian generals killed in this war.

It is one metric fuck tonne of senior staff, no doubt lots of it coming from solid intel and HIMARS or similar.

[-] twistypencil@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That lists 9, which doesn't seem like a fuck tonne

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

For context, Russia has been at war with Ukraine for almost two years. They have lost 9 Generals. The US was in Afghanistan for two decades. We lost 1.

9 is a fuck ton of senior staff in 2 years.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

It's hard to get a good picture imo. Russia is from what I understand top heavy so has more. Wiki says 1000 in 2008. Granted I don't think all of them are active and there's sectors like logistics that have generals, as well as different types of general although the wiki list only mentions the two highest types.

I would love to see an article that goes in depth on what this means for their army.

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The US military (all branches) has just over 600 flag officers. If Russia has 1000 that's still a massive difference between the loss rate. (.16% vs .9% or 139% difference) Also the US military also has logistics generals, not sure where you were going with that, could you please expand on it?

I'm not a numbers person so my math may be a tad wonky but that still looks like a significant impact.

If your just saying the army then the US has 218 as a max number of generals. 1 loss is almost .5% (.45%) of their numbers in 23 years. Russia lost almost 1% (.9%) in 2 years. At that pace in 23 years they should expect to lose almost 103 generals or over 10% of their flag officers.

That's a rate of .5% of generals a year. The US is averaging that in 2 decades.

I don't care how top heavy they are; 1% is an impactful amount of flag officers to lose in a year. Even if the impact is only to morale.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Good. Fuck russia.

[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

I hear Russian general corpses grow the best sunflowers.

[-] nicetriangle@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago
[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

And he didn't fall out a window! That's kinda rare with Russian high command

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

Oh no! Lol jk

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 9 months ago

How many generals are we at now? 12? I completely lost track.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
180 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39019 readers
1734 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS