1032
submitted 9 months ago by Backlo@lemmy.today to c/til@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fades@lemmy.world 152 points 9 months ago

Fucking disgusting, poor guy was a literal hero and was spit on for it

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is just life in the slave racket. Abuse victims are denigrated, subjugated, and treated as the real threat to their community and not the abuser. They are treated like that because the society NEEDS most of its people to be abused and to tolerate it so they can be exploited throughout their lives without challenging their exploiters, or even worse, tearing down the system that benefits the oppressors.

Abuse victims who actively rebel or who try to help other victims jeopardize the system's access to slaves, you see. So they have their spirits driven completely into the ground to stop others rising up against them.

Why do you think things like rape or domestic abuse are seldom punished? Or even murder to an extent? Especially since the government has had access to mass surveillance for over a decade and thus has the power to end such crimes completely?

The powers that be WANT this and NEED it for their system to survive.

That is the slave racket.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

This is absolutely true. It may ring strange to the ears of some people because we've had Me Too since some years ago, but what did usually happen to a woman abused by someone in a position of power 20 years ago? How often would they have gotten justice? The same happens today if you're victimized by a religious institution in a very religious community, by your boss in a workplace where everyone is scared of unionizing, or in a household in a community where most people would lean towards disbelieving you or ignoring the issue.

I'm going to go ahead and say that most people, when faced with very clear warning signs of someone else being abused, choose to do nothing about it because they're cowards. We absolutely need better systems to deal with these situations, but given that they do not exist yet, individual acts of bravery save people from getting their lives broken. Please think about this next time you think someone close to you may be suffering.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] FireTower@lemmy.world 134 points 9 months ago

MASH hosted about 20 fleeing men and children in the first four months of 2013 before being shut down.

Glass half full. He probably made a massive difference in the lives of those 20 in those few short months. Maybe even turned some lives around.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 45 points 9 months ago

glass half full with a hole in it

[-] Atin@lemmy.world 132 points 9 months ago

I was abused by my ex-wife for years. The treatment I received from government agencies was more damaging than most of what I got from her.

Certain organisations that are used to inform governments, from elected officials to social workers are based on the assumption that only men are ever abusive, that all men are abusive and the women can do no wrong. It started with the Duluth model and was followed in Australia by a study done by White Ribbon that specifically excluded straight men from participating. I know this is the case as I attempted to participate and that is exactly what I was told at the time.

Our bureau of Statistics has clearly shown that at least ⅓ of victims are men.

[-] creamed_eels@toast.ooo 83 points 9 months ago

This is what is meant when people talk about the patriarchy and toxic masculinity hurting everyone. It’s not “all men are bad!” But rather the idea that men aren’t allowed by society to have feelings other than anger, or are unable to be raped, or need to just “man up” when they are suffering-It’s all bullshit, and so harmful to men and boys. I’m so sorry for what you went through, and I hope you were able to find peace.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 26 points 9 months ago

I've heard many horror stories like this....

Had a friend who called the police on his abusive girlfriend when she pulled a knife on him, they arrested HIM for abusing HER despite him having witnesses...

I've also knew a guy who had to leave home because of his abusive wife, and when he asked about Abuse Shelters for men, the office kept recommending him to Anger Management programs meant to rehabilitate abusers

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dipshit@lemmy.world 92 points 9 months ago

Men’s shelters are needed. Men are also survivors of domestic abuse.

[-] glitches_brew@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

I am a victim of abuse. We had a kid too. The court handed my daughter to my abuser when she made false claims and I was arrested. All charges were dropped but the custody battle was delayed and made wildly more complex than it needed to be by the mother. Two months ago I was finally awarded sole custody. It has been so hard. To say male abuse victims have an uphill battle is an understatement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FJW@discuss.tchncs.de 74 points 9 months ago

Misandry is sadly extremely widespread and often not even recognized as a problem: Erin Pizzey who invented modern women’s shelters quickly found out that women were just as capable of being violent to their partners and logically tried to start men’s shelters as well.

What she had not expected was that instead with the support that she previously got with women’s shelters, the same did not happen with men’s shelters; instead she received insane amounts of hate, victim-blaming and death-threats from radical feminists. She had to repeatedly flee her countries because of material safety-concerns as a result of that.

In some way the peak I encountered of this kind of hate was some Fedi-site that had a rule banning misandry (good!), because it also harms trans people. Now the second part is very much true and as a trans girl I agree that it does and that that is bad, but that should not be the primary argument for why it is bad. That’s like saying anti-judaism is bad, because some Jews are white or saying misogyny is bad, because it also affects trans men or saying anti-black racism is bad, because it might affect white people with a strong tan: The statement is true and the secondary victim group fully preserves protection, but by making that statement you betray an incredibly bigoted mindset that doesn’t even respect the primary target-group enough to care about them at all.

There is a lot feminism that really just amounts to men-hating and that is why I do not use that label for myself. I believe in equivalent treatment and rights and so should everyone;

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 57 points 9 months ago

My god, what an awful story.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 55 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

He wasn't weak like some bigots may claim. It's just not that easy to fight the whole world alone. And he tried just that. A very tragic story that is really good to know to start untangling the problem.

If you want a good band that talks about that and are pretty aproacheable, IDLES is a good recent punk act with a lot of bangers. Search for them on youtube, their videos hit hard and their live on KEXP is fire.

This is why, you'll never see your father cry

This is why, you'll never see your father cry

This is why, you'll never see your father

+I mean that live: https://youtu.be/5Sbbiv5iSiQ

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PixelatedCleric@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 9 months ago

I felt my heart break after reading that...how can people be so cruel?

Men suffer too, and this kind of bullshit makes it harder for y'all to get help...

[-] tegs_terry@feddit.uk 17 points 9 months ago

Isn't like 33% of domestic abuse female > male? It's more than you'd think I know that

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

also men with men relationship violence adding to the numbers. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-29994648

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 50 points 9 months ago

Hmm, now I have concerns after watching this thread unfold. OP created their account 2 days ago and this thread is the only thing they've posted. They haven't even made any comments here or elsewhere.

And, different from the beginning, this thread is quickly becoming just the usual whinging from the bigoted MRA types that hate all women.

This thread feels like it was a setup.

[-] tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works 31 points 9 months ago

Even if the messenger might have dubious motives, I think the message deserves to be heard.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Lianodel@ttrpg.network 24 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's especially sticky because "Men's Rights" is a bait-and-switch, ripping off "Men's Liberation."

Men's Liberation is associated with feminist movements, because patriarchy hurts everyone. That's not to equivocate between the extents to which men and women suffer under it (or any group under systemic bigotry), but liberation and egalitarianism would help us all.

So Men's Rights does the thing where it appeals to people with genuine grievances, but offers them a bullshit solution that benefits grifters and people in power. It's not this systemic problem, it's this group of people, and if only we could deal with them, everything would magically fix itself. In this case, "It's not patriarchy, it's not capitalism, it's feminists, and women in general. If only we could get them back in their place, your life would be back on track. So vote for me/sign up for my course..."

So, bringing up the ways in which men also suffer under sexism can kick up some dirt to muddy the waters, intentionally or not. Some will be bad faith actors who just want to shit on feminism. Others will be taking the feminist side on this. And those in the middle, who see things turn toxic, can go any way—but if they stay neutral, or especially move right, then the reactionaries gain some ground.

So I don't know what's in OP's heart. But, at least from way too many fights online, I've found that the best course of action is to assume good faith, and give reactionaries enough rope to hang themselves. They don't have the better ideas, and they don't have the better plans, but they're good at shit-flinging. If you just make a good case, they tend to unmask pretty quickly and fall apart. There's no point trying to convince a die-hard bigot, but you can play to the audience by just making the better case and helping bigots embarrass themselves.

In my opinion, at least, for whatever that's worth. Sorry for the rambling!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Syrc@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago

this thread is quickly becoming just the usual whinging from the bigoted MRA types that hate all women.

Where, exactly? Is pointing out men have issues that get ignored (by women and men alike) equal to hating women? Because in 200+ comments i’ve seen maybe 3 or 4 actually hating on women.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] quackers 14 points 9 months ago

Am i missing something or are you just desperate to defend the claim that women can nothing wrong and men are always the baddies

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 24 points 9 months ago

See, you're proving my point. This thread should be about men's rights issues and focusing on improving treatment and options, like the facility that Silverman setup. But y'all instead are trying to make the subject matter about how all women are bad.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 13 points 9 months ago

It's especially about how feminism is bad. That's the center point about the majority of the manosphere. They do not care for men or men's issues. They care about anti-feminism. It has gotten so bad that a lot of people now equate feminism with misandry, at least that is my impression from what I read online. Mind you, this is the intended effect of the rhetoric MRA's use on social media.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 47 points 9 months ago

It's really sad the way he was treated and extra aggravating that the bigoted side of the men's rights movement has tried to take advantage of his death for themselves rather than to actually progress anything involving men's rights issues.

On that note, I'm going to go ahead and remove the quote sentence from the bigoted and extremely misogynistic A Voice For Men publication in the Legacy section. It's not even referenced anyways.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 45 points 9 months ago

I’d just like to make the note that the men’s liberation movement is the exact opposite of the men’s rights movement, despite the two sounding similar.

The men’s lib movement was founded specifically as being complementary to women’s lib and uses many of the same approaches and intellectual analyses. It explicitly rejects the MRA/red pill narratives while still trying to figure out masculine toxicity and honor cultures, as well as trying to elevate the idea that too few men seek or are able to receive the care they deserve. It’s very much against the patriarchy.

Unfortunately, like many communities on lemmy, it’s less active here than it was on Reddit, but it’s worth using the term as a search of nothing else.

[-] Atin@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

The Reddit Mens Lib group are atrocious. They in no way accept that men are not fully to blame for whatever rubbish that radical feminists come up with.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] jak@sopuli.xyz 43 points 9 months ago

Jesus Christ, 2013 is too late for that.

[-] cokeslutgarbage@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

My mother was the abuser in my home. She abused me and my father. That fact doesn't prevent me from knowing that men are statistically more likely to be the aggressor. I don't know what I'm trying to say with this comment. Life is scary and hard enough. May we all only share and receive kindness.

Xx love you.

[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I think I interpret what you are saying as that you're aware women likely need more help, but so do men, and we shouldn't assume the smaller one doesn't exist or ignore them because that group creates more issues than they have victims.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

So sorry to hear that.

I read:

1 - men absolutely get abused

2 - we don’t need to entirely eliminate any of the existing narrative that women have it rough [but let’s add abuse of men to the picture]

No notes besides sending some love back, brother.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I assumed you said that (about how men are far more likely to be abusers) to try to mitigate any reactions that take your very reasonable comment out of context. Any time someone points out that abuse or injustice can happen from the non-typical side of a binary situation, someone inevitably jumps in with a "well achually..." response. Sometimes it's said with the best of intentions. Sometimes it's just trolling our pushing a personal bias.

I disagree with others who say you are perpetuating something negative by saying that. That's clearly not what you are doing. You are just trying to provide a preemptive response to an inevitable counterpoint. Your overall point was well-made and reinforces the tragic but insightful story behind this post.

I hope you and your dad have found peace and happiness away from your abusive mom.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] quaddo@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

May we all only share and receive kindness.

Well said, @cokeslutgarbage

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don’t know what I’m trying to say with this comment

That despite being actual victim of abuse, and further witnessing your father be a victim of abuse, You still try to push the narrative that women are the only real victims and the only ones deserving of support.

and I dont say this to be mean, or snarky, or cruel to you. You've just got to realize how internalized you've got this shit.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ItsAFake@lemmus.org 30 points 9 months ago

Well now I'm sad and angry.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 29 points 9 months ago

Kudos to this man.

This shows me once again that man get no sympathy.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 28 points 9 months ago

This world sucks

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

That’s awful. He deserves to be remembered. Thanks for posting. Are there shelters in place now in Canada?

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This is really depressing. Men need those type of resources as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 9 months ago

Today I wish I didn't learn....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
1032 points (100.0% liked)

Today I Learned

17751 readers
9 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS