222
submitted 8 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 65 points 8 months ago

Bro just shoot him if you already do such idiotic things as executions.

Faster, more Reliable, less suffering, Cheap.

[-] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 32 points 8 months ago

That seems like a good idea. If they really want to execute someone, make the official of the state shoot them on video. I'm guessing capital punishment would be almost zero within 10 years, because nobody wants to be seen as a cold-blooded killer, especially when they know that people could review the video.

[-] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 months ago

Nah instead two elections cycles later a candidate will be elected, who will be running ad breaks and monetizing execution videos, all while parading patriotic bullshit.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

Yep. Have the governor of the state be the one who has to pull the trigger, since they're the ones who can stop it.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

This would backfire as you'd see people voting for right wingers more because it's "Cool and manly to kill people", you'd also get the foot in the door for legalized bloodsports.

[-] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately, you're probably correct, especially humanity's history of violence.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Trump would volunteer for every one of them

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Just drop 10,000 pound block of concrete from a crane. Fast, painless, and reusable.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 8 months ago

And fun to watch too. You'd make a killing selling tickets or posting it online.

[-] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 2 points 8 months ago

Hmm... The question is how reliable it is to hit and how much the operational costs are. I think a bullet is cheaper.

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

The thing about a bullet, is someone has to shoot it. The crane could be set on a timer, so nobody has to feel guilty for pulling the trigger.

[-] CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That's a thought. 🙂

Guilt for administering a death has been thought of before; that's part of the reason why there's a firing 'squad'. You have however many people with lethal rounds, and however many people with dummy/blank rounds, so nobody knows for sure whose bullets were live & killed him.

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, if I have to choose a method for myself I want my head instantly mushed please.

[-] light_mnemonic@lemmy.world 61 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This is normal in low-oxygen, low-CO2 hypoxia.

The patient is not conscious during these spasms, and feels no pain.


EDIT: Nitrogen hypoxia is an instant and painless death experience, because you pass out almost without conscious awareness, the same as if you go under the gas they have at the dentist while counting down from 10 and never remember getting to 1. The difference is that the body's death is very slow, as the body's tissues are deprived of oxygen and slowly run out of gas and stall out. As long as the patient continues to not spike in CO2, they will remain unconscious and unaware through the entire process - as necessary and brutal as it is to - you know - stop a body.


EDIT2: Exercise reasonable doubt when reading the comments below which are calling into question whether the patient 'gasped for air' or doubt for some reason that a mask is adequate. 1) The patient held their breath from the nitrogen intake as long as they could. This is the same as you sitting on a dentists chair refusing to inhale the gas. You will quickly suffer the normal heightened discomfort until your brain takes executive control and just makes you to inhale. The patient in this case brought their will right up against that reflex, a miserable experience and one in which I can't imagine it was a comfortable mental space to be in. Then the inhale reflex kicked in and they nearly instantly lost consciousness. Over the next hour or so their body slowly ceased function, without tripping any of the really scary nervous system alarms. Patient never woke up. 2) A mask is preferred in systems like this because of the inherent safety risk involved for the administers with invisible, body-encompassing volumes of nitrogen. A mask is also totally up to the task, as anyone who's been put down at the dentist can attest to. These masks also have multiple, multiple added redundancy features which help protect the air seal, as well as post-review-diagnostics. They're safe. The main concern in this situation is administer training, in the proper handling of the body's seizures such that the mask isn't somehow pried off.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Except they said he was gasping for air. Nitrogen hypoxia wouldn't do that, because you'd still be exchanging CO2 and your body wouldn't recognize the lack of oxygen in the air.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago

Because they put a mask on him instead of filling the room with nitrogen.

Bunch of idiots.

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

AND he held his breath as long as he could to avoid inhaling. Really it should be done in a whole room like you said, and at a random time so as to avoid that stressful “last moment” struggle.

Preferably we don’t execute people at all, no matter how heinous their crimes.

[-] 7heo@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago

Not idiots, it was very much an informed decision.

[-] Sconrad122@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I'm not doubting anything your saying, but calling someone who is being murdered by the state the patient is icky, even if the methods being used are analogous to those used on patients who are receiving medical care. It also underlines the point that, of course the victim resisted because they were being killed, compared to a dental patient who is willingly undergoing a procedure they can expect to wake up from. Nitrogen hypoxia may be an effective way of administering a humane death to a willing participant, but in some ways giving a false perception of control to the victim (as long as I can hold my breath I won't die, as obviously futile as that may be) is undermining all of the considerations of physical discomfort that go into describing the process as humane

[-] light_mnemonic@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Agreed on all points. Patient seemed like the least-biased form of address, but these are situations were bias is very, very hard to overcome.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago

Bro at this point, just fucking shoot them....

Or better yet, how about we don't kill people as a form of legal punishment in any decade officially taking place after the middle ages?

[-] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Crazy how americans love to shoot each other for any reason, but would never shoot for death penalty. Weird.

[-] muse@kbin.social 13 points 8 months ago

??

4 states still use it. 2 have considered switching to it within the last year

[-] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Oh good, why not all of them? I mean its not worse than other methods..

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago

Well the cleanup is a bit worse for the poor sod stuck with that job.

[-] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Well that's true, but I guess the comfort of the poor soul getting shot has the priority.. but yeah, never considered the afterward..

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

“Pro-Life”

[-] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

Awww did it make the poor people witnessing someone get killed a little uncomfortable? Ooh noooo how teeerible

[-] Catoblepas 8 points 8 months ago

This is so needlessly nasty. The people witnessing it included his priest and family members.

[-] 7heo@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

I'm guessing the actual problem is with a method allegedly killing painlessly in minutes being "tweaked" to kill with maximum prejudice in the longest possible time... Knowing humans as I know humans, I don't think the "witnesses" would be in any discomfort seeing exactly what they came to see.

[-] thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just going to, uh, leave this here...

Jacob Geller - The False Evolution of Execution Methods (YouTube)

A little documentary on how execution methods have changed over time and how they haven't necessarily gotten more humane like we'd assume they would.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 12 points 8 months ago

Nitrogen hypoxia is humane for the person dying (if done right), just maybe not for the spectators. You just lose consciousness and never wake up.

They fucked up by using a mask instead of a chamber.

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago

The whole idea of it, and the process, and the people who scheme to support it.. is absolutely ghoulish.

The death penalty, or using nitrogen to do it?

[-] aksdb@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I hope they investigate and publish details. Nitrogen was supposed to be painless - it's used for suicide capsules after all. So I wonder what went wrong here.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 27 points 8 months ago

The asshats at the prison decided that nitrogen was a deadly poison and used a respirator setup that recirculated the exhaled CO2.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Why is there only like lethal injection for killing someone.

Surely this was a bad idea, and is there not a million other ways to do it?

Carbon monoxide? Let them fall sleep and just fucking die like they always tell us to be careful of with gas at home.

Or any of the myriad of poisons and toxins out there that causes instant death.

What about that damn fish from Japan. Surely better than this spectacle plastering the news.

I mean there’s god damned suicide booths out there in some country, why not bring one of them in!

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 12 points 8 months ago

Nitrogen is way better than CO. They just fucked up the delivery system, as government usually finds a way to fuck up somehow.

The problem with injections is they have to use a mishmash of different drugs because no drug company wants to have their products associated with executions and everybody reacts differently to drugs so you can't predict how long or how violently it might result in.

Everyone reacts the same to nitrogen gas though, it's predictable and peaceful and cheap as long as you do it right. One theory I heard was that they used a mask which was a closed system so he was able to breath his own breath for a long time since you don't use all the oxygen in every breath. They should have had a system where each breath is expelled out from the mask and in from the nitrogen source, like a back flow stop valve or something.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I see. Thanks for the explanation

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
222 points (100.0% liked)

Interesting Global News

2477 readers
332 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS