335
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 87 points 9 months ago

Susan McDougal got 22 months for refusing to answer three questions for Ken Starr...

[-] youngGoku@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Her name sounds so familiar, can't remember what this was about.

[-] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 46 points 9 months ago

These white collar crimes are such wrist slap punishments, meanwhile Laquisha smoking a joint after a 70 hour work week from three jobs to pay for her kids inner-city shitty public school lunch goes to jail for 40 years.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Crystal Mason got five years for voting a provisional ballot.

Five fucking years. You could guess the state and you know her race.

This guy plans a coup to overthrow democracy and oopsie four months. Don’t get me wrong, I’ll take it, but fucking hell.

If there wasn't a minimum mandatory sentence, then this is in the judge as well as the prosecutor, both of whom have discretion.

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 44 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Federal prosecutors referenced the case of right-wing podcaster and former White House official Steve Bannon in their sentencing memo. Bannon was sentenced to four months in prison on a similar contempt conviction in October 2022 but is seeking to overturn his conviction and has not yet served any time.

It's infuriating that these pieces of shit can just be like, "Prison? Nah, I'm good. Just gonna chill for the next two years until hopefully Trump gets elected and gives me another pardon."

[-] newnton@sh.itjust.works 23 points 9 months ago

Let him rot

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago

Wish there was more bite to this. At least a year.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Four months? Pathetic. The only way justice will be served if these traitors get shanked in prison during their short visits...

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

The old Chauvin treatment.

[-] Grobmobularb@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

May he rot, even if it’s just for a few months…

[-] kowcop@aussie.zone 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

After the fourth months in what will probably be low security retreat, is he made to comply? Otherwise it seems like a slap on the wrist

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

Navarro appealed his conviction immediately after sentencing.

Anyone know if he will begin serving time immediately or if he's free until his appeals run out? I know if you or I were sentenced, we'd go straight to jail, but that doesn't seem to happen for the ruling class.

[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Story time:

Years ago, I interned with the local sheriff's office. I spent most of my time there with the warrant team. They went out and arrested people with outstanding warrants. In doing so, I learned that after sentencing the convicted person voluntarily report to prison. They had to process a number of people who were sentenced to prison but never reported.

I, like you, expected people to be transferred from court to prison after sentencing. That was a shocking revelation for me.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Good to know. So my guess is this guy is never going to spend a single day in jail.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Navarro was convicted in September on two counts for refusing to testify and provide documents to the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol, which issued its report and dissolved in late 2022 after Republicans won control of the House.

U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta handed down the sentence Thursday and also ordered Navarro to pay a fine of $9,500.

Trump referred to the report in his infamous "will be wild" tweet on Dec. 19, 2020, encouraging supporters to travel to Washington for a "Big protest" on Jan. 6.

Assistant U.S. Attorney John Crabb said before sentencing that Navarro did not have a good faith basis to invoke privilege.

Federal prosecutors referenced the case of right-wing podcaster and former White House official Steve Bannon in their sentencing memo.

"Like Stephen Bannon before him, throughout the pendency of this case, the Defendant has exploited his notoriety — through courthouse press conferences, his books, and through podcasts — to display to the public the reason for his failure to comply with the Committee’s subpoena: a disregard for government processes and the law, and in particular, the work of the Committee," federal prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memo.


The original article contains 461 words, the summary contains 203 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Introversion@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

Good. Now do all the current congressmen who also refused to appear for their subpoenas. Start with Gym Jordan, please?

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

Awww... I hope he doesn't accidentally fall on a sharpened toothbrush.

[-] crumpted@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I hope when he becomes a "documentary" film maker a la Dinesh D'Souza. Comedy gold.

this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
335 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4212 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS