1467
submitted 1 year ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

let's gooo

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 330 points 1 year ago

And if they don't vote, it won't matter.

[-] jennwiththesea@lemmy.world 133 points 1 year ago

So help them vote. Volunteer with efforts to get out the youth vote. Push for universal mail in voting where you are, or at least early voting. Help get politicians and initiatives on the ballot that they actually care about.

Shaming and complaining about the demographic you want to reach accomplishes nothing.

[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Obligatory-

If you are a legal resident of Wisconsin, and are not currently serving time or on paper, you can register to vote entirely online if you want, and you can request absentee ballots for all elections for the entire year (no reason needed, but necessary annual renewal, it’s my New Year’s resolution every year because it’s so easy to accomplish. entirely free of charge ofc.).

Just go to www.myvote.wi.gov to register, request absentee ballots, check your registration, or find your polling place. If you have any difficulty with your registration, you can find your local rep and contact them directly.

Please vote. Please vote for your own wellbeing. Please.

Edits to fix link redirect per convo below

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

Shame ✍️ demographics ✍️ for ✍️ helpful ✍️ advice

My state’s on it!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

But both sides are the same or my vote is worthless or it's too hard to vote or something

[-] Clam_Cathedral@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

That said, election day not being a federal holiday is a crime.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] francisfordpoopola@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago
[-] Veneroso@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I really hope that they do.

Because I am worried about the camps.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago

Because people are already jumping to conclusions without reading the article. Here is the core of the survey data.

https://www.axios.com/2024/01/23/gen-z-less-religious-more-liberal-lgbtq

Identifying as Republican went from 32% in the Boomer Generation to 21% in Gen Z. Identifying as LGBTQ+ went from 4% with Boomers to 28% with Gen Z.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] citrusface@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Then can we please be out and get out and vote?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

Republicans know this, and push culture war issues to drive certain voters out of their states/area.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

Now if they’d just vote….

[-] FoxBJK@midwest.social 33 points 1 year ago
[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

Specifically, an estimated 27% of eligible voters in that age group turned out to the polls in 2022

In 2018, approximately 31% of young people voted

It's not that many, and it's actually down from the last midterm election. Fucking vote.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Golly I remember once on Reddit saying that people should vote and by howdy did a whole bunch of angry people vote me down double digits because, you see, apparently voting doesn't matter and I made people feel sad.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Raz@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago

I'm LGBTQ...AND republican. Although that means something vastly different where I live, haha (I live in a kingdom).

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

The only cool kind of Republicans

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hereisoblivion@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by this.

Does this imply that the human race is drastically more sexually fluid than most species when allowed to be without oppression? Or that the culture gen z has grown up in helps cultivate a more fluid preference?

I grew up in the 80s, so I'm trying to understand, but it's tough meshing statements like this with my experiences.

Please don't misunderstand this post as disapproval. Just confusion.

[-] vind@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 86 points 1 year ago

Amazing what not punishing things does

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

I think it's mostly that very few of them identify as Republican.

But also, the less stigma around gender expression, the more kids will be open to explore theirs.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

That’s not what the data said.

https://www.axios.com/2024/01/23/gen-z-less-religious-more-liberal-lgbtq

Identifying as Republican went from 32% in the Boomer Generation to 21% in Gen Z. Identifying as LGBTQ+ went from 4% with Boomers to 28% with Gen Z.

Both changes are major, but the LGBTQ+ change is massive.

[-] Linuto@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

It's probably worth mentioning we recognize certain types of people as part of the LGBTQ+ umbrella who were not before. Asexual people, for example.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Also huge swaths of bi people and a lot of people who are now understood as gay and trans as opposed to straight people who hate their body and life but got rejected from hormones

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

The best explanation I've heard is that it's similar to the stats for left-handed people. Way back in the day, almost no one "identified" as being left-handed. But once the stigma against left-handedness was eliminated, the numbers went up.

So in other words, yes, it's a reflection of LGBTQ+ becoming more acceptable, particularly among Gen Z. There could be other factors, but that's probably the main one.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a confluence of factors. LGBTQIA+ is sort of a gender/sexuallity/ phenotype physicality solidarity alliance and the actual boundries has grown in scope since the 80's.

Like take for instance asexual people. Asexuallity became a part of the solidarity when people reached out over the internet and and started realizing that there were a lot of people who just don't feel sexual attraction and that there are certain widely accepted forms of social coercion that revolve around pushing people towards sexual attraction. But asexuallity as a part of the LGBTQIA only really became a thing in the early 2000's. Non-binary trans identities are much the same. A lot of people were feeling the way they did about themselves in isolation but they had no frame of reference to think that they were not just the odd person out.

The other half is a society wide re-examination of compulsory heterosexuallity/cis gender hegemony. There are way more people out there who no longer define themselves by who they've chosen to have physical sexual experience with and now a lot more people are more frank about defining themselves by the range of people they are attracted to. Like if the majority of people artificially penalize a bi-person for choosing a same sex relationship a lot of people will just take the easier path and just narrow their choices or keep their liasons with the restricted choice secret and not assume the label.

I before I came out as trans initially figured I didn't count as trans because I both wasn't physically transitioning and my industry is somewhat hostile to trans people so I was very closeted ao I figured the label only really belonged to the people brave enough to live out of the closet... But eventually someone found me and was like "No, it's not aspirational. Even deep in the closet you are still trans."

This combination of destigmatization, solidarity messaging, the inclusion of whole other groups (like intersex people, gender minorities, asexuals) broadening the scope and outreach to the closeted means that more people generally self identify as LGBTQIA or queer.

Animal kingdom wise we're still less observably sexual fluid than other primates. Bisexuality is actually pretty ubiquitous particularly amongst male primates with it actually being the overwhelming norm in some species so chances are we are probably actually haven't seen the curve level off from suppressive stigma.

[-] Carvex@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I believe it's your first option, acceptance for being yourself is the normal instead of a beating from your parents like pre 2000.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 48 points 1 year ago

Wow, a news story that makes me think my kid could actually live in a better political climate than me in a few decades. I forgot what this feeling was like.

[-] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bro, I'll tell you the same thing I was told as a young guy in my career. I'm in my 40's now and this was about 20 years ago. An older guy about to retire said something like 'ya know, everyone always says that the younger generation is lazy, or dumb, but from what I noticed you guys are doing it smarter and you'll be better than us.' I kinda thought that, but it was nice to hear.

Now I'll say about 10 years ago, I was recruiting in high school and those kids were leaps and bounds ahead of where my generation was. It was crazy how much they could socialize across cliques and it not matter. Now that I am in my 40's I have some family members in high school, and I just see them being better. I don't know how this will translate into the work force or a fight for a labor reform, but I think we need to be more open to their ideas than our elder generations were to us.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chocosoldier 42 points 1 year ago

sees headine oh, that's good news!

sees source oh it's gay fox, which means it's probably sensationalized to the point that the headline is a lie, because that's what they do over there.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] anarchy79@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I would identify as ANYTHING before as a republican

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 year ago

Not buying it. Probably just scared of the well deserved ridicule received if they identify as Republican. We'll see how the vote goes.

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

ThankFuckingGod.jpg

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

What a glorious headline!

[-] ytg@feddit.ch 21 points 1 year ago

Why would anyone identify by their political ideology? Or worse, by a single party??

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
1467 points (100.0% liked)

News

24550 readers
3387 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS