553
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cali_ash@lemmy.wtf 194 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

If you follow some of the links to pirate sites in the article you'll get redirected to some anti-piracy site which amongst other things tells you this:

Bitch ... that's literally the reason I pirate.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 77 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Now only 1400$ a month to watch any show at 480p! Upgrade now to 2100$ per month for the high resolution videos? Can't afford it? Just get another job you lazy hobo!

[-] ugo@feddit.it 48 points 10 months ago

Not so fast now! High resolution video only available on edge on windows

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The problem isn't the number of providers, the problem is exclusive licensing deals.

If it was like music, then (theoretically), more choice is better. AFAIK all the platforms have pretty much all the music, so there is some choice available.

With TV and film, it's so fractured that it's literally easier to just pirate things, even for shows I (potentially) have ad-free paid access to already. With Stremio + Torrentio + a Debrid service, I just launch one app and everything's available in seconds. With paid services, I need to search Netflix, then Prime, then CBC Gem, by which point I'd already be watching.

Plus, torrentio lets me pick the video quality I want, so I can force 4K H265 on my big screen for films or just pop on a 720p H264 on my small underpowered laptop (that can't decode H265 fast enough for smooth playback).

It's not even about price, it's just a better experience to pirate. And that's a Big Problem for the industry.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 172 points 10 months ago

They keep telling us that we can’t own or preserve media. We strongly disagree.

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 135 points 10 months ago

My mind is turning on the piracy front. I've paid for Netflix for like a decade, and it was good.

I tried not to pirate, but there was no legal way to stream Game of Thrones, so we would do watch parties. Eventually HBO came to Canada through bell and I could watch it online.

That moment was pretty great, I could watch all my shows, and HBO, and Netflix was putting out some strong content.

Then everyone decided they wanted a piece of the pie. Netflix has continued increasing prices while everyone pulled their content out, Amazon turned prime video into a roulette wheel of "can I watch this or not", and Disney+ launched and very quickly turned into only shovelling garbage quality star wars and marvel projects, and now everyone is stuffing ads into their shitty content fiefdoms.

We're back to where piracy is the better experience and now I can't watch the content I want because it's at most 2 shows a year per platform.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 72 points 10 months ago

When they remove access to content I paid for... Fuck em.

If buyin' ain't owning, piracy ain't stealin'

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 32 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

To be fair, streaming was never buying. It was always paying entry to a library. If stuff gets removed from the library that's the way it is.
That isn't to say I don't agree. Piracy is a service problem, as Gabe Newell so eloquently put it. Streaming started losing the moment it started splintering into cable networks.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago

Sony allowed you to purchase episodes and seasons of shows like Mythbusters. They specifically stated you were purchasing that content.

Then they removed that purchased content from people's account's after they went separate ways with Discovery. Sony and Discovery stole from their customers

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] The_v@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Media companies, "We are losing money because people don't want to pay."

Or just maybe, your product sucks and people are finding alternatives to avoid dealing with you.

Currently pirating or streaming from a secondary site is faster, better quality, and easier to use. It's really not that hard to figure out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 92 points 10 months ago

Have they considered offering better content and services than the free options?

[-] BlueLineBae@midwest.social 70 points 10 months ago

Gabe said it best! "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work. It's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates."

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 10 months ago

sparking concerns on Wall Street that the services will never be as profitable as cable once was

Obligatory fuck Wall Street

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 10 months ago

All my homies hate wall street

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago

Yeah this was the entire reason streaming was successful. It was cheaper than cable. Did they think more money would appear from nothing?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hightrix@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Say it louder with me for the people in the back.

Piracy is not stealing.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

"If buying is not owning, then piracy is not stealing."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The solution is so easy. Make your content available at a reasonable price, make it easy to use, don't restrict it by geography, and let people watch it on any device that can connect to your service.

Piracy is about ease of use (it's getting even easier), and about value. DRM has repeatedly been shown to hurt only the people who try to pay for legitimate access. Not a single time has it prevented me from getting a copy of something if I wanted to, and it's clearly not stopping people from providing those copies or streams.

So stop wasting bathtubs of money on stopping piracy, but maybe take a few less buckets of money from consumers in exchange for your service. As long as you price it such that the cost of being legit can't compete with the ease of use and value from piracy, some folks aren't going to make the choice you want them to.

Some folks won't be able to spend on your service anyway, because they just can't afford it - but they still might buy other merchandise, they can still spread how great your show is to their friends who possibly will subscribe to your service, but regardless you aren't going to get their dollars no matter what you do. So stop trying.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] 44razorsedge@lemmy.world 65 points 10 months ago

Just stopped in to say fuck you to the greedy motherfuckers who created a market for sharing massively overpriced content and now cry all over their piles of money cause they are BIGGER piles of money.

Which is to say: "Fuck you".

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 64 points 10 months ago

I don't use these services, but after learning a bit about them I have to say I'd rather pay an honest thief than one who lies about ownership ¯_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] art@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

The people who are stealing our movies and our television shows and operating piracy sites are not mom and pop operations,” says Charlie Rivkin, chief executive officer of the MPA, who adds that some of the operators also engage in drug trafficking, child pornography, prostitution and money laundering. “This is organized crime.”

I like how they always have to fabricate a connection to organized crime. Trying to convince the reader that is not just copyright infringement.

[-] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's projection.

Hollywood was founded on IP theft of European filmmakers' work and funded by various mobs, which then went on to lobby (bribe) politicians into changing certain regulations on gambling in AZ, et al, to pave the way for Vegas and the like.

Fuck Hollywood with a rusty pineapple sideways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EfreetSK@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago

Can someone list those piracy subscription services so we can avoid them as responsible citizens?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This has to be stopped. Just look at what Napster did to the music industry. That’s right, there used to be a music industry and now it’s just…gone. No more music, no more money to be made in music. Don’t let these evil streaming services do the same to poor defenceless Hollywood, bastion of women’s rights!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 51 points 10 months ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Vengefu1Tuna@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago

That illustration with the hook through the film reel is so clever, I love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cali_ash@lemmy.wtf 46 points 10 months ago
[-] Vengefu1Tuna@lemm.ee 84 points 10 months ago

It's so funny to me that we have to circumvent the site's paywall in order to read an article about pirating.

[-] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com 31 points 10 months ago

Based as hell.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 39 points 10 months ago

Adding to the discussion, if you want to watch anything that's not mainstream (i.e. non-western, or arthouse), you're basically supposed to either wait for it to stream on Mubi or get a Blu-ray/DVD (that are often out of circulation if it's more than 5 years old). So the only real option is pirating.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feliberto@programming.dev 36 points 10 months ago

I've been doing this for free.

Meme: You guys are getting paid?

[-] BudgieMania@kbin.social 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It sure is fascinating how surges in the usage of pirate platforms tend to coincide with eras of worsening value proposition in entertainment. We should really get some top notch analysts on this to get an explanation.

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They make hardware with defects looking at you RROD and YLOD , they expect you to rebuy everything again every time there is a new console ( Nintendo). They remove your content that you have paid for from your library (Amazon, Sony, music from games), they alter the deal after purchase by instering DRM and shitty launchers and turn off servers (Ubisoft and EA). They lock you out of accessing stuff on devices you own with DRM (eg Netflix 4k on linux ).

Then we have regional releases, changes to privacy policies which we didn't agree to when we signed up.

Add to the fact we're being fucked over at every turn. The price of everything is increasing, housing is a mess, they're fucking up the environment while record profits have been pouring in year on year.

They can go suck a lemon 🍋

I will only support FOSS and those who help further that goal such as valve. Otherwise it the high seas everyday.

🏴‍☠️✊

[-] halm@leminal.space 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

So Hollywood copyright lawyers will target illegal subscription services rather than individual downloaders? Fine by me.

I can understand paying for a legal streaming service where at least a tiny percentage of profits goes into producing new material. I pirate out of convenience and availability, because movies and series aren't released immediately in my region.

Paying somebody for streaming film and TV shows that they have no hand in producing, and thus not supporting new productions — same as I can download for free myself? — that makes no sense to me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Matty_r@programming.dev 34 points 10 months ago

So what they're saying is they could get all that extra revenue if they lower their price and just undercut the competition?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Subscriber fees? Who's paying for pirated content?

EDIT:

[-] Maalus@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago

Instead of paying for 50 streaming platforms, you pay for one that has it all. Convenient.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Lots of people are. Real Debrid is the shit! It's about $2.80 per month for the ability to stream pretty much everything. But ads? Nah, man. There are ads on the torrent sites, but none on streaming. Pirates are pretty ad-adverse.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ksgt69@lemm.ee 33 points 10 months ago

Oh no. Poor Hollywood. Darn.

[-] LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol 29 points 10 months ago
[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 25 points 10 months ago

Haha, they won't even allow me to watch stuff on Netflix in 1080p because I use linux. Eat shit

[-] SternburgExport@feddit.de 24 points 10 months ago

Oh no…

Anyway

[-] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Oh no. Poor Hollywood.

Anyway…

[-] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 22 points 10 months ago

Oh no! Anyway dot jpeg

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
553 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54758 readers
189 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS