171
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Clemson University to ban TikTok on all campus networks effective Monday, July 10.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Kururin@talk.kururin.tech 25 points 1 year ago

Yay!!! The Chinese Spyware has been banned 📿

[-] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago

Long live American spyware 😍

[-] psykick@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Fake news. American government would never spy on its own citizens!!

/s

[-] galloog1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

There is no known western API access directly into your phones through any major social media company and if it were known it would get patched. I'll take the American spyware over the CCP spyware any day of the week, thank you very much.

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Horray, communism is no more!

/s

[-] booty_flexx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

[we are doing it for the] “integrity of information and resources connected to the Clemson network”.

They're not doing it to censor or discourage use. They're doing it because they don't want the software running on their network alongside their network resources.

You can still use tiktok, just not while connected to their network infrastructure.

IMHO, this isn't s good move. I don't have any love for TikTok but I hate fascism even more.

[-] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

I’m not following. Can you elaborate a bit on how a private university banning TikTok is fascism?

[-] irkli@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because the only reason to bsn TikTok are racist reasons. Their practices have been examined closely and found to be less invasive than they rest. And Facebook, they're horrible.

The reasons usually given are mumbled generalities but refer to China getting access to American citizen data.

"China" seems to be the common theme.

The very data for sale on the open market. It's all bullshit.

I'm not defending TikTok and certainly not Chinese govt practices. They do evil. But no evidence of it in this instance.

[-] ultimate_question@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it also racist that China has banned Facebook and many other US based services?

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's not racist but it is terrible

[-] Noahv@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I do think so.

[-] Alkider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Dude, some people just prefer longer form content. To each their own.

[-] Alkider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I never said that shortform content is bad or that tik tok should be banned. I just couldn't care less about the app because it just doesn't have anything in particular that interests me. If it did I would be using tik tok and not lemmy lol. The comment above just kinda rubbed me the wrong way i guess.

[-] lps2@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Clemson isn't private, it's public. It is certainly their prerogative to secure their network and their users' data but there are definitely concerns over government censorship. I don't think this issue is as black and white as people ITT are making it out to be and absent a larger policy stance that would van TikTok or it's practices, I'm not sure this is the right move though I understand their position given the inaction of state and national legislatures in banning foreign spyware

[-] zaph@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They're not banning their students from using tiktok, they're blocking access to a website on their own networks. That is how network security works. I have many IP addresses block for many customers because some website shouldn't be accessed on networks with PII. It's really not that complicated.

[-] lps2@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I'm well aware - as a public university things are a bit different as they are agents of the state so this becomes a free speech issue. Also, if a university's student internet is the same network containing PII systems like their student records, there are much bigger problems. That's why I mentioned that this action without any legislation that would curtail Bytedance's data collection presents a student rights conundrum. The app does not (as far as we are aware) inject or capture information from the users network but rather the user themselves which they have consented to. The larger issue is whether or not the US should allow foreign entities to collect this info and that's not something the university should be able to decide but rather the state and federal regulatory agencies and legislatures

[-] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago

Lol how is it fascism if you could just use your mobile data to access whatever weird social network you want?

[-] Dark_Arc@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

facism: a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition

I think you'd be better off just saying censorship.

Ultimately though we've never seen anything like this, the old school rules for what constitutes acceptable censorship might need some adjusting (especially as society learns more about what closed source algorithms made by hostile foreign powers used by the youth -- and general population -- of a nation can actually do to said nation).

It would violate my constitutional right to performing dance trends in my dining hall.

[-] pandacoder@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The ban is on campus networks, but the reactions I'm reading are acting like this is a ban on the campus itself.

It's not censorship (or fascism), just like if they blocked PornHub it wouldn't be censorship (or fascism).

And no, blocking PornHub on a university campus where the vast, vast majority of connected users are 18+ isn't justifiable unless it was under the grounds of security.

[-] Noahv@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I guess VPN will be more popular.

And how the fuck do they plan on enforcing it when anyone can turn off wifi with a toggle switch?

This is stupid. Beyond stupid.

[-] Alkider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Lol how are they expecting to crack down on this if you can just use cell data.

[-] Unseeliefae@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

That is the point.

People can use their own cell data to watch meme videos instead of hogging all the network bandwidth and slowing down wifi speeds for all the students who are trying to get actual schoolwork done.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
171 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59407 readers
2470 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS