372

EU antitrust chief to Tim Cook: Apple must allow third-party app stores (appleinsider.com)

submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

43 comments fedilink hide all child comments

EU antitrust chief to Tim Cook: Apple must allow third-party app stores::The European Union's Margrethe Vestager has met with leaders of US Big Tech firms to discuss their operations in the EU, and with Apple's Tim Cook concentrated on the App Store and Apple Music.

all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 133 points 2 years ago

The EU is literally the only major entity actually trying at this point. Thank you!

[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Actually a bunch of other countries are considering the same thing. Including the USA.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

Yea, but they only copy EU, which does the hard work. So I bet nobody would do anything, if EU wouldn’t.

[-] Yoz@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago

People should move to EU

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

More nations should join the EU.

And NATO.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

How's NATO gonna join the EU?

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

we're gonna make it work. Technically all the Members are either European or were at some part european (colonies) so you're welcome, you can enter.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 8 points 2 years ago

Y'all seem to be doing fine without my vote... The United States on the other hand... Definitely needs to keep my vote...

[-] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

There's already too many non Europeans in Europe.

[-] Yoz@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

that's okay. When yo live in a capitalist economy where globalization plays an important part , you can't choose who can come and who can't. The power is not with you or me to decide. We can whine but that's about it.

[-] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I'm already planning to do that, but the Schengen Area imposes visa restrictions on us, and there's a 20% chance I'll get denied anyway.

And no, the country that I wanna go to is not the Netherlands, despite my username looking like someone from that country. I still like it doe.

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago

No, thank you. I will continue to use Apple's App Store. What made me switch to the iPhone was the fact that I could trust the apps in the App Store. I knew there was no chance of downloading malware. It's a liberating experience.

I don't want it to be like Android.

[+] MagneticFusion@lemm.ee 74 points 2 years ago

[deleted]

[-] Drusenija@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Nobody is asking you yet. Once it becomes an option I guarantee some apps will decide that they'd prefer to use a third party store over the App Store and if that happens to be an app you use then you are essentially being asked to use other app stores.

This isn't advocating for or against it, I'm just saying that if you think that this is purely additive and those who don't want it can just not interact with it and get the same experience they have today then you're being naive.

Regardless, it's going to be interesting to watch. Smaller niche apps that don't need discoverability will probably benefit, since if you need a niche app for something you're probably prepared to put the effort into using a third party store. Large apps I suspect will go a hybrid model if they do anything at all (use both the App Store and a third party store, with the third party store having a lower price, although I guarantee it won't be 30% less), and stuff in between will likely stay on the App Store unless there's enough of a network effect to get enough users to a third party store to make it worth switching.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

App developers are unlikely to take themselves off the Apple store it would remove themselves from a huge portion of the market they developed an iOS app for.

But they will find third party stores taking a smaller cut than Apple does. They will pass on some of that saving to the customer or find a way to encourage you not to use the Apple store if they get to keep a higher cut. Like earlier updates and feature releases.

That's the point. Apple currently has a controlling monopoly on a market. Competition will lower prices for the consumer.

Anti-trust laws exist to do exactly this.

All it will take is a trustworthy company to launch a 3rd party app store. Then maybe you won't mind.

Some companies like Cisco might just launch a store instead of putting their apps through Apple as they would like higher security than the App store provides.

Apple will also be forced into a competition to be the most secure app store too.

The likelihood is they'll just play with the margins and do what's necessary to keep a near monopoly but the possibility of competition is useful in itself. At the moment there isn't even that.

[-] Drusenija@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

All it will take is a trustworthy company to launch a 3rd party app store.

This really is the key to this being successful I think. Right now a lot of the nervousness around opening iOS is because of the fact that people (rightly or wrongly) trust and have a relationship with Apple.

The people who are concerned about third party app stores really are worried about the implication of having to trust a new third party with their device, their payment details, their personal info, etc.

Put someone reputable behind an alternative and it becomes an easier sell.

[-] madis@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Well, do you see it happening on Android for any major app except Fortnite?

[-] Drusenija@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That's fair, and I admit it's one possible outcome of all this. I just think that if the EU mandates that both Apple and Google have to support them that it's going to shift the needle on it as the alternative infrastructure will be properly supported on every major platform. As you get that infrastructure, get payment providers in place to drive it all, the friction of switching will drop, which makes it a more appealing option for developers.

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Nobody is asking you yet.

🥱

Are you a 🤡 or a 🧌?

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Using the same logic: just don’t participate by not purchasing an apple product. There are alternatives out there, buy an android. I enjoy my walled garden, it’s a feature that I pay a premium for.

Enter everyone to tell me why I’m wrong and/or stupid (see replies below).

[-] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I won't call you names but this literally doesn't make any sense to me. In no way would the apple app store be affected, your walled garden is safe. To (attempt to) extend the metaphor, this is like giving you the option to take walks in other gardens, but your walled garden is still where you left it, gate locked.

[-] exothermic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you, I appreciate your response.

I just wish someone could explain to me the benefits of doing this? Who stands to benefit financially? Who are the stakeholders? Why can webapps not be used instead? Do side loaded apps have access to apples APIs, do webapps not? Can apple, like Reddit charge for use of said APIs?

Also, why does everyone seem to portray such a personal stance on the subject, how would allowing side apps benefit any of those who have downvoted me in their day to day lives.

[-] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apple is interested in maintaining full control of what apps can be on their platform and how they are presented because it gives them power over negotiations with companies that build the apps. They are basically able to "name their price" and make sure they are always getting as big of a cut as they would like.

The EU is interested in not letting them do that because that kind of "negotiating" behavior is pretty well understood to be anti-consumer. Increased costs for app developers are usually passed directly onto the consumer through the prices. And it tends to get worse over time.

No company anywhere wants to use webapps anymore. Apps installed on devices are free advertising and access to user data. It is frustrating but the way it is, on all devices, already. So basically the answer is the same as why can't most apps that already exist on all devices anyways just be web apps.

I don't think sideloaded would be quite the right word, this is about access to other app stores (like the google play store or amazon app store, or more niche ones) that would then formally and automatically install and maintain apps exactly the same way the apple app store already does, presumably just with a different library of apps to choose from.

Apps from another app store would need no access to any API by apple unless they were specifically interacting with apple services, AFAIK. Which, would be under the full control of apple and apple chooses who uses it, how, and how much they use it, but that is already the case regardless.

I tried to answer your confusions as best as I can do with what I know already. As for why people take this so personally, I would say it is a complex topic combining businesses that are constantly trying to drive each other out of business with the social effects of making the tool people use to communicate a status symbol. And it has been brewing for long enough that people are getting extreme opinions and fostering long term grudges based on personal experience, to the point that some people have some real hatred towards anyone who has a different phone OS than them.

This was a long comment to type and I did it while laying in bed half asleep. Sorry if it has a bunch of typos or errors lol

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

These are weird questions.

Who stands to benefit financially?

The developer, if they are distributing themselves. Also potentially no one. That shouldn’t really be a concern though, why are you concerned with what seems to amount to “someone needs to be making money off me, I want it to be Apple!”

Who are the stakeholders?

Again, literally anyone or no one.

Why can webapps not be used instead?

Why can’t you use a web app for all your PC applications? Because native APis are always going to be more expansive than what is made available to a web UI.

Do side loaded apps have access to apples APIs, do webapps not?

It’s a mixed bag. Some yes, some no. But you’re generally going to be able to do more with native apps than a web app.

Can apple, like Reddit charge for use of said APIs?

Why… would you charge for local API access? You’re paying for the hardware, you’re paying for the computation time, you’re paying for the electricity, why would Apple get paid?

Also, why does everyone seem to portray such a personal stance on the subject, how would allowing side apps benefit any of those who have downvoted me in their day to day lives.

Apple explicitly doesn’t allow certain kinds of apps on the App Store. Many of those can be replicated in a web app, but not all. One easy example is game emulation. You can do some emulation in a web app, but the performance isn’t going to be great. You can sideload an app that does it better, and you can actually force load with a different flag to have them work even better than that. One such emulator is Delta.

I’m a little concerned on your line of questioning honestly. It seems like you’re extremely concerned that the (first or second depending on the day) largest company in the world is going to lose out on a little money. Why are you so invested in them making money? How does Apple making more money benefit you in your day to day life?

[-] ashok36@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

I've been on android for 10+ years and never downloaded malware.

Don't try to download cracked apps and you'll be fine.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

Lol, there IS some malware in the App Store and there is not more malware in the playstore.

Only difference, on android it is easy to sideload, for example, emulators. And that there exists an alternative opensource app store (Fdroid)

[-] painfulasterisk@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

https://lifehacker.com/great-now-the-apple-app-store-has-malware-too-1849386738#:~:text=Most%20recently%2C%20security%20research%20Alex,single%20group%20based%20in%20China.

https://www.wired.com/story/apple-app-store-malware-click-fraud/

https://nypost.com/2024/01/02/tech/smartphone-users-warned-to-delete-these-17-dangerous-apps/

Now you will say, but I god-like smurt (smart), I wunt (won't) download this, ofviously (obviously).

[-] guywithoutaname@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago

No one is forcing you to use another app store. I'm sure the operating system will also allow you to turn off apps from unknown sources just like Android. More options for other people is not a bad thing. People paid for the device, they should be able to use it however they wish.

[-] Spotlight7573@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I'd be more worried about every company trying to force their users into using their own store to access their apps.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Simp harder for daddy

[-] MrNobody@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

Don't you think app developers should have the freedom of choice for app stores? Android has multiple places to get apps, lots of FOSS apps aren't on play store, and likely aren't on iOS at all. Having the option for 3rd party store gives not just users, but developers too, an option and access to more apps/users that wouldn't otherwise be available. You want safe secure apps, that's all good.
You mentioned that an app might move away from the app store to a 3rd party store, if you already use and trust that developer's product how will having to get it from a different location change that?
Now, not to sound too harsh, but why your convenience of not having to go get another store more important than a devs ability to host their product in a different location?

[-] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

All these corporations just getting greedy. There will be a pirated app store and I will be the first to endorse it!!

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep right

Here's 10 malware for iOS that don't involve using a store

https://macpaw.com/amp/how-to/most-common-iphone-viruses

And then an article about malware from iOS store - for now hoping it's not click bait, I'll read it after work

https://lifehacker.com/great-now-the-apple-app-store-has-malware-too-1849386738

[-] chitak166@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think anyone would be forcing you to use a different app store.

This would just make the option available for those who want to.

[-] seedd@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The only third party store that should be allowed is fdroid (or fios ig), everything else that is sideloaded is either malware or pirated apps

[-] halva@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 2 years ago

pirated apps

oh woes.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

~~This community encourages such incredible depth and discourse. Keep it up, folks!~~

Edit: whoops, posted this on the wrong community. Yay, piracy!

[-] muh_entitlement@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

You don't like free stuff? Piracy is the only way. Ahoy!! 🏴‍☠️🦜

[-] seedd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Ofc i do, i won't have jackshit in my jellyfin without it. But apps, nah..cracked apps are full of shit

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Yea, because with cydia zebra and sileo, you can only install malware /s

[-] seedd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

thats not what i meant, i meant that it just opens the door for malware. And even with android, how many people actually install apks? Not many, bcs everything is there on the play store.

[-] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Have a read of this: https://techcrunch.com/2023/12/19/all-the-changes-coming-to-google-play-and-sideloading-following-700m-settlement/

Sideloading is a lot harder on Android than it should be.

[-] seedd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You just have to open the apk and click install, how is thay hard?

this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024

372 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73287 readers

3395 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws