574
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Prosecutors will seek the death penalty for the white supremacist who killed 10 Black people at a Buffalo supermarket.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 118 points 10 months ago

The death penalty is a barbaric institution. It always has been, and it always will be. The government says it’s okay to murder this person, so let’s murder him.

I don’t get why that doesn’t shock people’s consciences and sense of basic decency.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 90 points 10 months ago

I think it's that guys like this one aren't a hill anyone is eager to die on. Like, it's bad, but let's not make this guy the poster boy for ending the practice. There are other cases I'm much happier to cite in arguments opposing the death penalty.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago

Perhaps one of the many innocent folks on death row, which includes a not insignificant amount of African Americans too.

But this guy can fuck right off, I am not losing a second of sleep to his suffering.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I am never worried about guilty people on death row. I am worried about those that kill them, those that help kill them, those that witness the killing, and those who believe falsely that this form of justice will heal anyone from harms or prevent future harms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nobody@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago

Even a single innocent person getting murdered by the state makes the practice barbaric. The state is imperfect. It should not have a license to murder.

[-] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 44 points 10 months ago

We're all in agreement, but as OP said, this
particular person isn't the time to make your stand on. We've all been vocally against the death penalty for a long time, but this specific person is not the one to make an especially strong "this is the line, no further" kind of stand for. I'm against him being killed like I'm against all cases of the government killing prisoners, but I'm also not doing any extra standing up for this particular person.

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

So you only stand by your views as long as it's convenient and easy?

I guess the right of attorneys is important but if the state violates his rights to that in this trial then you are not gonna have an issue with that either?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

I have a friend who went to protest outside the federal prison when Timothy McVeigh was executed. He had no love for McVeigh. He thought McVeigh was a monster. That wasn't the point. The point was that capital punishment is always wrong. The state should not have the power of life and death over its citizenry.

And I have great respect for him for doing so. Protesting capital punishment in cases like this are just as important as in lesser cases because the reason for the punishment isn't at issue.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Probably because our morals and principles collapse at the first speed bump.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago

Too busy getting our consciousnesses shocked by mass killings at supermarkets, I guess. By the way, nice work blinding that cyclops.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Fuck the death penalty, the guy needs to be punished, but the death penalty is barbaric.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

I don't disagree, but also I think the death penalty is too merciful. This guy should live forever, watching the world go by without him or his ignorance. He should be forced to watch home movies and social media from the families of the people he killed. Watch them mourn, and how they find hope and love in a world where he also exists.

He should live long enough to learn that his life is meaningless, his actions, while extremely harmful, will be forgotten to history as just another violent, murderous bigot. He should realize that from inside a 10x10 room, and then he should live another 50 years with that knowledge.

The state shouldn't kill people at all. It isn't a deterrent, it doesn't cost less money, it doesn't increase justice, and sometimes we get it wrong. There isn't a good reason for the death penalty to exist, and plenty of reasons it shouldn't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Not just barbaric, but also more expensive than life in prison. There's also all of those cases where an innocent person is killed.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] derf82@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago

The only issue with the death penalty is the potential to execute the innocent. There is no danger of that here. I don’t want to share the planet with this racist prick.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The other issue is that it quite frequently costs exponentially more to administer the death penalty due to years of appeals. I'm not sure how that would work in this case, since as you said, it's apparent that the defendant is guilty.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 36 points 10 months ago

Let him rot in prison. Abolish capital punishment!

[-] ComradePorkRoll@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

The reactionary in me thinks "life in solidarity confinement without the chance of parole."

The me in me says he needs a long time in some sort of rehabilitation program. As much of a monster as he is, he's a bit of a victim. May he be studied so that we can pinpoint and prevent others from following his path.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

From Wikipedia

Motive Anti-black racism White supremacy Belief in the Great Replacement and white genocide conspiracy theories[6][7][8]

A political wing of the USA is responsible for this

[-] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 31 points 10 months ago

If you kill the man, his suffering is limited. If you lock him away in a supermax for the rest of his long days, his suffering is a thousandfold.

[-] ApostleO@startrek.website 11 points 10 months ago

Sure, but there's also cost to the state to be considered.

That said, the common methods for execution used today are surprisingly expensive.

[-] randombullet@programming.dev 24 points 10 months ago

Isn't it more expensive to execute someone vs a life sentence?

We should do another penal colony. Like Venus or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 31 points 10 months ago

I don't even kill spiders. It's hard to look at that photo and understand, how this young adult even considered doing this. What broke him like that? Maybe, instead of killing him, we can somehow guarantee no new guys like him would happen. Not in a genetic crime bullshit fashion, but in providing psychological services, making regular checks, noticing them and reaching out before they act like that? He's a fucking idiot, but also a guy that fell through many safety nets proving them ineffective.

[-] Im_old@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

That's not how the prison industry works. There's no money in fixing people if you can use them as unpaid labour.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BeerMedic@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

It's a worse punishment to let him rot in prison.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

I don't like the death penalty and how inequally it's applied, but in this case I say we decrease the surplus population.

Rest in piss, asshole.

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Just kill the useless and dangerous folk and it’ll work out in the benefit of society.

[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Who will be deemed useless and dangerous?
Who will have this power to judge?
Will they be responsible, or corruptible?

[-] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Exactly. I said that to make the death penalty look bad, which it is.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
574 points (100.0% liked)

News

23387 readers
2565 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS