288
submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Tesla speculated electricity from thin air was possible – now the question is whether it will be possible to harness it on the scale needed to power our homes

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] briongloid@aussie.zone 46 points 2 years ago

It's always a matter of how much electricity and how efficient is it.

[-] Devccoon@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

10 kWh per day from a washing machine sized cube is nothing to sneeze at. Whether the humidity to keep it powered consistently is achievable and the maintenance to keep it running is sensible and the cost of building up enough of this stuff to output that level of energy can be commercially viable - that's the big question.

[-] QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

10 kWh per day

This gave me a chuckle. 10 kilojoules per second for an hour per day.

[-] rambos@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

They have said it wrong, its more like 42 000 miliWat minutes 4 times a day

[-] Devccoon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Is it wrong, though? Hours and days cancel out to give you the energy production rate (10,000 watt*hours/24 hours or just under 420 watts).

[-] hitwright@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Zirconium costs around 30 dollars per kg. That "washing machine" gonna cost around 60k on materials alone. I'm guessing it might be great for watches and other low power devices, but it likely won't power homes as is.

[-] riskable@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Nah... The "disc" isn't 100% zirconium. I don't know what it's made out of but the zirconium part is just the nanowires which would likely be some teeny tiny percentage of the overall weight. If it's like silicon ICs (e.g. the CPU inside your computer) zirconium would probably account for less than 1% (probably 0.1 or even 0.001%) of the overall weight.

99% of it likely to be "packaging" which is tiny copper wires carefully connected to the zirconium (probably via an intermediary material) to transmit and combine the power along with loads of insulating materials and lots and lots of high temperature plastic (so it can survive short bursts of soldering).

It's a prototype and may not like getting very hot so maybe they didn't use normal soldering methods and might have used conductive adhesives or similar crimping or vacuum welding or other fancy ways of connecting things that labs have access to for such things.

[-] weedazz@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Down here in Miami I feel like I've been drinking the air instead of breathing it the last month or so! I definitely think there will be climates very well suited for this technology

[-] bilb@lem.monster 29 points 2 years ago

Farts have to be pretty humid, right? I look forward to being able to charge my cellular telephone by simply expelling gas from my rear using specially made underwear.

[-] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Self recharging vibrator

[-] Raildrake@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

If that was the case I'd be able to power a building by myself.

[-] astral_avocado@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 years ago

The Lyubchyks estimate that the levelised cost of energy – the average net present cost of electricity generation for a generator over its lifetime – from these devices will indeed be high at first, but by moving into mass production..

So next to the fact that these nanotubes will clog with bacteria/particles from the air, and that they'd likely solve it with another device that completely purifies and pushes the air, I'm not hopeful.

[-] Faust223@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Waiting for that Thunderf00t video on this.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

It sounds interesting, but I don’t quite get where the energy comes from - it sounds like they are harvesting the kinetic energy from the water molecules? So what is the net effect when scaled up? Does the device get very cold? an ELI5 would be appreciated

[-] ramblechat@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I hope one day we will be able to charge devices without plugging them in - even if the amount of charge is small, it might be able to trickle charge all the time.

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

check out energous.com stock ticker WATT

[-] tehcpengsiudai@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Singaporean: Take my money!

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 years ago

Dam. I really hope this turns into a thing. Something like this that works and is cheap to produce will be so beneficial.

[-] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 18 points 2 years ago

The issue is the amount of energy produced (minuscule) and the requirement for very humid air. It's also likely that the device needs to be colder than ambient temperature if I've got my thermodynamics right, so removing heat might be necessary, obliterating any gains and turning it into a dehumidifier that produces a small amount of waste electricity.

It might be another option in the pile of 'energy harvesting' solutions, where you need microwatts to miliwatts to power devices like remote temperature sensors, to avoid fitting ten-year lithium batteries. It doesn't seem likely to go beyond that.

[-] machinin@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I don't believe it requires any temperature differential. It looks like it works by using something similar to static electricity.

[-] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I just want us to dehumidify the whole South

I don't know how humid this air has to be, but summer in Georgia hits 100% humidity fairly regularly so it'll definitely work

[-] KeisukeTakatou@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Sorry to hear the scientist commited sudoku tomorrow with 2 gunshots to the back of his head. /s

[-] antaymonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

I'm going to assume you got auto corrected from seppuku to sudoku. Because that is hilarious.

[-] Tatters@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

It doesn’t say how humid the air needs to be. Will it still work if humidity is low?

[-] sab@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

There's always some humidity, so I guess in the end it depends entirely on how efficient they can make this technology. It's probably a bit too early to say.

That said, if you live in a tent in the Sahara you probably shouldn't postpone investing in solar panels over this.

[-] DashboTreeFrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I imagine this having practical usage in maybe keeping things like sensors working in a plumbing or caving kinda context considering the low power currently created. Awesome!

[-] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

It doesn't matter how complex we get, it always breaks down to moving water in a varied state of matter.

This is a really neat accident and I am hoping to follow this one closely.

[-] Strolleypoley@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

So if this gets scaled up for global use won't it cause issues by drying out the air?

[-] machinin@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It doesn't look like it dehumidifies the air, just takes advantage of the humidity's electrical charge.

[-] ZetaLightning94@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Feel like there is still room for error, so this needs to be investigated further. Would be a great substitution.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
288 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

69391 readers
2227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS