152
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Despite this fall in coal reliance, the thinktank said, “most of the emissions cuts in 2023 are not sustainable from an industrial or climate policy perspective”.

Müller said: “The crisis-related slump in production weakens the German economy. If emissions are subsequently relocated abroad, then nothing has been achieved for the climate.”

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Its easy when you outsorce more and more industry to countries who don’t regulate emissions.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

You can not outsource certain emissions like the electricity grid, transport within the country and heating. Also Germany is a massive exporter of industrial products.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

So, still twice the co2 emission of France nuclear based energy production. Good job ecology nerds.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago

or 60% more per capita and propably around 18% more then the EU per capita.

What do you expect from a country most famous for genocide and killing millions in two World Wars?

[-] OKRainbowKid@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What point are you trying to make and how is it related to the holocaust?

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

If you’re adding the context that basically says “it’s all bogus”, why not adjust the headline accordingly? This makes it seem like Germany actually did something to protect the climate.

[-] sic_1@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, we wrecked the economy by trapping it in dead end technologies and killing off innovations for decades under conservative government. Degrowth like a champ!

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
152 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5394 readers
149 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS