149

On the spectrum of cheddar offenses, this is nothing

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 70 points 10 months ago

Wow that’s ridiculous.

Makes me think of how it’s nuts that women are forced to wear skirts in tennis still.

[-] cobra89@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Women were forced to wear all white at Wimbledon, including underwear... Until they finally got an exemption for women menstruating THIS YEAR! In fucking 2023. Absolutely ridiculous.

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 66 points 10 months ago

there's some confusion over FIDE's dress code.

Vague rules definitely serve a purpose.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 41 points 10 months ago

Vague rules are meant to be enforced arbitrarily. The whole point is to give the enforcers an excuse to penalize someone.

[-] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 21 points 10 months ago

vague rules exist to give jurisiction the abuility to make calls, however if the judges cannot even define what each type of shoe is, then the rule is useless.

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 18 points 10 months ago

Certainly, although this is assuming the judge will act fairly. It could be that the judge just didn't like her, for whatever reason.

[-] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Obviously her taste in footwear

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago

Well, at least she didn’t shit in the shower.

Apparently that’s a big no no in chess.

[-] pizzazz@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That was a Xiangqi player. AFAIK, shitting in the shower is allowed in western chess.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

No no no in western chess you shit in an outhouse or on the open range. Shitting in the shower is in 4D Chess when you’re trying to gaslight your alcoholic roommate.

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago

Chess players are the only people who will put on a suit to play a board game.

[-] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Well, someone doesn't dress up for Monopoly. It's not the same without the Top Hat.

[-] leds@feddit.dk 25 points 10 months ago

Sports shoes? Isn't competitive chess a sport?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

My thoughts exactly.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago

Dutch doesn't have a word for sneakers. They are called sports shoes.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

What do the Dutch call people that sneak then?

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Sports shoes.

[-] hollunder@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago
[-] Zugyuk@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I wonder if there is a specific rule against clown shoes.

[-] teegus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago

There's a blanket rule about "indecent clothing" or something, they could probably fine whatever they wanted.

[-] Decq@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Now I want to see Magnus Carlsen come in clown shoes at the next FIDE event. I wonder what they will do then.

[-] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 10 months ago

And there's no rule against wifi controlled vibrating anal beans. Interesting.

[-] DreamAccountant@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Whoever thought that a game that follows very, very strict rules would have a strict dress code, time code, ethics code, or any other kind of code? Oh, that's right, anybody smart enough to play chess well. Fucking duh.

Sticklers gonna stickle, or let all adults play nude to wearing anything.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nah, this is some horseshit. Those shoes do not clearly violate any rules, and also why the fuck do they have a rule against "sports shoes" but allow "sneakers," and how the hell are those not sneakers?

The game has extremely strict rules, that's no reason to think the organization running it is more anal than Niemann's beads

[-] UdeRecife@literature.cafe 8 points 10 months ago

That's what happens when you allow bureaucrats to rule. It happens in every field, in every industry. It sucks how quickly the rules become seriously caricature-like and out of touch. Cf. Kafka's The Trial.

[-] SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Go on then, show us which rule she broke.

We'll wait.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Did a superiority complex subreddit get shafted by Steve recently? Been seeing a lot of shit like this lately.

[-] fill@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

lemmy has had the superiority complex folks of reddit since the very beginning. that and trekkies for some reason lol

this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

907 readers
115 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS