230
I can understand glorifying terrorism would be a problem.
How is saying that Israel should stop bombing hospitals the same as glorifying terrorism?
Hospitals are the very bases of Hamas so yeah, kind of. To the very least if you expect Israel to not bomb the people who attacked them at least give a realistic alternative.
Here's a field manual that details the rules and has some advice. There are a whole host of rules protecting civillians hospitals, but in the case where Hamas is using them as military bases, I'd say they can be considered primarily as human shields, though I'm no expert, and even if that's not the case they're still civillians and therefore protected. According to paragraph 2-20, "feasible precautions" must be taken to reduce civillian harm. This means bombing is pretty much out of the question, but there are still plenty of other ways to get at Hamas, such as SpecOps, sieges, and diplomacy. It's a difficult situation, but that doesn't mean you get to kill civillians with impunity.
My first thought, when I heard about the Hamas tunnels was: is it a war crime to pump carbon monoxide into the tunnels? Then I heard that they were keeping the hostages in the tunnels. So yes. Yes, it would be.
In other words "too bad you get bombed with rockets launched from hospitals and schools, now you can't retaliate".
Anyway those moral lessons are given by countries and people who've never been in a similar situation, not by a long shot so they're pretty much worthless.
If you truly wanted to help the Palestinians you would advocate for a real, democratic government to rule them that would actively seek peace with Israel, not a terrorist organisation whose only goal is to annihilate it.
What about democratic government in Israel who is truly seeking a peaceful solution of this conflict and not a bunch of far right extremists? Is it too much to ask?
What about a fair treatment of Palestinians, giving them some dignity? The war and the conditions regular Palestinians are put through are only going to radicalize even more people there. Look at yourself, you seem to be hating and generalising them as all being supporters of Hamas, but look at yourself, you seem quite on the far right spectrum without even going through this hell. So how are you seriously expecting any better from them, who for generations have been treated as second class citizens.
And believe me very few people here are antisemites, as you claim. I believe most people are making a difference between your government actions and regular people. And calling everyone who is pro-human rights person antisemite is a common apologist point of view.
And again, if you had managed to find peace with them and was treating them fairly in the past and wasn't conducting violent indiscriminate war against them for decades, yes, I said decades, because it is concerted effort not starting just now but going for a very long time, I am sure the antisemite globally would be a lot lower number.
Don't call yourself pro-human right if you're unable to condemn terrorism when it's in front of your, when literal peace activists are currently held hostages in gaza. Dont lecture me on human rights when you support a country that executes gay people.
You really think being anti Israel is being pro human rights?
Your speech is very nice and full of hope but it completely erases the fact that children in Palestine are raised to hate Jews, but I guess antisemitism is basic human rights too.
Also I don't mind being called right wing, it's only a slur for you.
"You generalize all palestiniens being supporters of Hamas'" take a look at this poll
bottom line:
Some 60 per cent in Gaza expressed support for the armed struggle against Israel, as did 70 per cent in the West Bank
I am condemning terrorism, and any act of aggression towards civilians. I am definitely not pro-Hamas, no matter how you try to twist my words. But I am also not feeling obliged to condemn them in every of my comments, but if you look through my comments you will see a fair bit of me condemning them.
I am also not anti Israel, I know Israeli people, I have visited the country on a couple of occasions and I still believe there are a lot of sane and good hearted people there who also want to find a peaceful solution to this conflict.
You on the other hand didn't say anything good for Palestinians or expressed any human empathy towards their suffering.
How is starving the whole population of Gaza justifiable in your eyes, or the internal displacement? Or crippling their entire health care system?
Why do you think terrorism isn't flourishing during peace and prosperity? By killing them and making them live through this hell you won't achieve anything other than radicalizing those people and giving birth to more Hamas or replacing this with the next terrorist organisation fighters. When did violence have been a basis of long term peace?
load more comments
(3 replies)
Yes, Hamas the terrorist organisation which was funded by the Israeli government because Netanyahu didn't want to negotiate peace with a unified Palestinian Authority. In what year did the citizens of gaza elect Hamas as their representatives?
Looks like you know the answer so why do you ask? And do you know how many offers the PLO turned down? Or these don't count?
Yes, Trumps' Deal Of The Century was amazing. /s
They're welcome to retaliate. They're just not allowed to indiscriminately bomb civillian infrastructure.
Yeah so basically leave all Hamas HQs and bases intacts lol, got it.
Something they've yet to substantiate, as the Washington Post showcased yesterday. Conflating taking two injured hostages to a hospital on October 7th and tunnels that were built by Israel themselves in the 80's does not a base make.
But the IDF have clearly determined they don't need to show evidence of any kind and can make any claims they want, even when easily debunked by others, because there are no consequences for lying.
Hard to substantiate better than the very director of an hospital admitting Hamas turned hospitals into military facilities.
The proofs are there. Whether you refuse to look at them because of your blind hatred for Israel is another story, but it would be easier if you just admitted that.
Sorry, but no. A hospital director kidnaped and tortured by the IDF and made to make a statement under duress isn't a credible source of information. Just like how I wouldn't believe the claims of an IDF soldier kidnapped by Hamas if he said the IDF ate babies or something.
Lmao yeah I thought so, it happened to me a few times with Hamas supporters asking for proof when confronted with actual proof. You guys are a quite a crazy bunch I'll tell you that.
Holy crap that video is hugely damning to Hamas!
Doesn't matter to all the anti-semite folks here though, Zionist bad guy is bad and is the reason for poor Palestinians 'misery.
They're pretty insanely biased even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Honestly I don't think people can be this blind in the face of so much evidence - seems intentional
They're pretty insanely biased even in the face of overwhelming evidence.
Honestly I don't think people can be this blind in the face of so much evidence - seems intentional
They're just racists, not the brightest people generally. You can't resonate with logic with them since they follow an ideology, and not facts/logic.
The antisemites that plague this community dont like that video so they have decided it’s fake.
That's generally how they operate lol, there are a lot more videos including with the son of Hamas' leader speaking against his father but I honestly feel I'd be wasting my time posting them here.
You're sick im the head
I posted proof that Hamas uses hospitals as military bases, not sure what else you need to stop supporting them but yeah go ahead and insult me if it makes your feel righteous.
I posted proof that Hamas uses hospitals as military bases
What proof? You've provided nothing. You just said they use hospitals as bases. There's no link, no source, no evidence at all.
Israel destroyed Al Shifa Hospital under the lie that there were tunnels and a command centre underneath, and weeks later there's still no evidence of anything that resembles a command centre.
There's no evidence at all that these facilities were being used as bases. Bombing thousands of wounded, innocent civilians under the probability that there might be a base (even though it's not confirmed) is just terrorism.
The only reason Israel isn't being done for war crimes right now is the US, and even they are saying the bombing is indiscriminate.
Proof that each one of you terror supporter disqualified and downvoted me for.
So in the end facts dont matter to you, and no matter how much proof you see, you'll always claim it's fake.
Which is ok, but at least be clear about the unfair game you're playing, stop lying to yourself.
Just because you claim there is no evidence doesn't mean it's true, it just means you don't want to look at it.
Isn't that the guy who got tortured? With enough torture, you can get a lot of people to confess whatever you want them to, regardless of its veracity. But even if Hamas was using hospitals as military bases, that doesn't give the Israeli army the right to bomb them. Just go in and take the building.
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's over for you zionists. The spell is broken. Your actions have now opened the floodgates to people criticizing Israel. The Right hates you. The Left opposes you. The young dislike you. You have lost the war. Remember, guerrila warfare is political.
lool because you think Israel needed to wait for this terrorist attack to be hated? 🤣 Antisemitism is the most widely accepted form of racism and if you think it ever disappeared, well ask yourself if you yourself ever truly stopped being an anti-semite.
Israel does not equal jews. You are literally propagating an anti-Semitic trope.
And I thought getting banned from big subreddits was annoying...
I'm going to remember this.
I'm patiently waiting for the day a pro-Israel person is fired for their views in a western country. Surely that will go over well.
You can't negotiate with terrorists that hide behind their "you can't do anything about us cause we were oppressed in the past" rhetoric. Jewish people haven't suffered for so many years just for some of their leaders to turn around and inflict the same kind of hate that their parents and grandparents faced. They need to clean up their government, or at some point it will become the task of others to do it.
Siding with terrorists who rape women and children is not a popular stance. Hamas needs to be destroyed and they are embedded within the civilians.
That doesn't mean the Israeli government is allowed to wipe out all of Gaza. A long military occupation is warranted but Israel should have to pay for the damages it caused.
Conflating #freepalestine with "siding with terrorist who rape women and children" is a bad look.
Siding with terrorists who rape women and children is not a popular stance.
That's odd, since siding with terrorists is literally what Israel did when funding Hamas in order to destabilize Gaza.
At this point, considering all the atrocities inflicted by the Israeli army throughout this year alone - "siding with terrorists who rape women and children" means siding with Israel.
this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)
World News
38979 readers
1884 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS