Makes sense, if you pay for a whole cheese burger but you only get half you can take the other half.
This is the mantra
I hate DRM. Especially as an open sourcer. If all methods of buying it are DRM'ed I won't buy it. My wife has Netflix and contribute the same to OpenRightsGroup, who fight DRM, to balance out our karma. I won't watch Netflix.
But it's not just media now. A lot of modern device have anti-features and lockout the user. I won't say owner, because if it's a computer and your not admin, your not the owner. Car are terrible for this and it rubs right up against Right To Repair. They use this power imbalance to force you to use dealerships. Crazy thing is, the cars modules are also closed black boxes to car manufacturer. I've been to car industry talks where automotive engineers complain of this, and everyone is nodding, but they don't see their own closeness is no better. They want other to be open with them, but don't want to be open with others.
It's a terrible state of play. In future, today will be a digital darkage and will only be the pirated and cracked stuff that makes it through. It's so stupid, shortsighted, anticompetitive and certain amount of just evil.
You shouldn't have to pay for something which there is no scarcity of. A haircut takes time and effort, so you should pay for it. Food is not unlimited, so you should pay for it. Software can be duplicated an unlimited number of times, so you should not have to pay for it. That's just giving people passive income.
In cases like this, creating artificial scarcity is very important. Without scarcity, no producer would finance new movies because there's no way to make back their initial investment. So just like with patents, we create artificial scarcity by giving the people who made the movie exclusive rights to decide who can watch it.
Even though scarcity isn't enforced upon us like with most goods, it's in literally everyone's best interest to create (and enforce) that scarcity.
I don't think this is a great argument. While the greed of corporations is in no doubt, and engage in unethical and annoying behaviour to fleece, us the users, of as much money as possible, work was still required to produce the product.
YouTubers for example work to produce videos, can anyone really claim we shouldn't have to pay for their work? (sign up for direct support if you can afford it via things like Nebula)
I dunno, seems like a flimsy argument to me.
A better argument is that the companies are shit, fuck them, just steal it if you want to.
