1856
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Betch@lemmy.world 370 points 1 year ago

Yeah I really hope other car makers follow because I fucking hate touch controls in cars with a burning passion. It's idiotic and not safe at all.

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 200 points 1 year ago

Same goes for kitchens. Give me real buttons and knobs and not these abhorrent touch panels that refuse to work every third time. A good quality kitchen appliance is identified by high quality knobs that last for decades.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I pumped gas at a brand new Shell station over the weekend. The controls for the pump was one GIANT touchscreen (I'm talking probably 12 inches wide by 36 inches tall). It was fucking PAINFUL to use. Every touch took 2-3 seconds for the action to happen. Da fuck is wrong with a regular pump and regular buttons that just work!?

[-] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 103 points 1 year ago

Because then they don't have a display the size of a living room TV to shove ads in your face

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And to sell to the station owner when their proprietary hardware breaks. Oh what am i saying, they're all service contacts these days. So more expensive service conrtacts and the ability to shut them down for non-payment

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It should be illegal to connect a touch screen to a computer that runs like a potato. Even computers in the 80s could respond to keystrokes and mouse clicks in real time.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 46 points 1 year ago

Biggest problem is that they cheap out on the tech parts. Nobody complains that an iPad has a touch screen, cause it works. But an appliance tends to have a crappy UI, running on a crappy touch screen, powered by a crappy CPU.

If they just used quality parts, it'd probably be fine, and the only issue would be expensive replacement for an entire assembly, instead of small, cheap parts that can be fixed.

[-] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago

A smartphone or tablet screen has the function to have multiple buttons and responsive functions on one and the same place.

A kitchen appliance doesn't have or need that. Absolutely no need for digital or so-called "smart" gimmicks.

[-] dojan@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Yeah! Instead of having a knob my idiot stove has “touch areas” - good luck cooking if you’re blind.

At my old place, if I wanted to set the bottom left plate to the hottest setting, I’d put my hand on the leftmost knob and turn counter-clockwise until it snapped once.

On this thing I usually have to start with turning off the child lock. We never turn it on, but every time we wipe off the stove there’s a like 95% chance the child lock activates due to the lingering moisture.

After turning the child lock off you have to hold the power “zone.” Then you have to select which burner by holding its zone - if you don’t you’ll start changing the timer when you hold down the - button to cycle from 0 to keep warm, to 9, and then press + to turn it from 9 to boost.

I'm legit not joking. Mind you this example is when the piece of shit behaves. I’ve an absentmindedly placed lids on the off “button” before and had the piece of junk refuse to turn back on for half an hour.

What does the touch controls add to my experience other than frustration? A knob doesn’t activate from water splashes. A knob doesn’t turn from residual moisture from a slightly damp cloth. A knob is tactile and pleasing to hold, and can be used by anyone of appropriate age, even if they’re blind.

Four knobs could pull the weight that these NINE touch “buttons” fucking struggle with.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago

It's idiotic and not safe at all.

Not to mention completely useless in places where you need to wear gloves when driving.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] squirrelwithnut@lemmy.world 251 points 1 year ago

Good. Touchscreens are the most unsafe feature added to vehicles in decades. It's honestly mind boggling how it was allowed in the first place.

[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

Easy, because regulations don’t mean anything anymore.

Headlights that blind you in the day and literally block all vision of the road at night, road legal trucks which bumpers that START at the hood of my car, all around limo tints on literally every car, people disabling their rear lights for some idiotic reason…

And that doesn’t even begin to mention the drivers themselves, so fucking self absorbed, tailgating, cutting you off for fun to get to the same light.

I’ve literally had a stream of cars going around me on street roads and so many dumbasses just follow the stream that I literally cannot safety accelerate because they’re all cutting me off bumper to bumper.

You should start carrying a gun if not already. The conservatives have successfully rotted western society.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 94 points 1 year ago

The fact that they needed to receive a lot of complaints to reconsider makes me wonder - do they even do any kind of usability testing for their products? Anyone who even sat in a car with only touchscreen can tell you the experience is not comfortable.

And I don't think it's just about the price of physical buttons. Buttons are a selling point right now, they could charge a small premium (not in the thousands but ~$200 certainly.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Or follow the BMW plan and put buttons in the cars but make them subscription only.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Never read from a book that summons demons, even as a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

It’s probably a cost issue. Running one wire harness to a touch screen is a lot cheaper than running a wire to every button in a car.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

It's also a "We can charge $900 for this $80 touchscreen when it fails in 5 years because your car is a brick without it" issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

Replacing the buttons with a tablet has always been a cost saving measure on Tesla's part that was marketed as "futuristic", physical switches and dials made of plastic and metal as well as the underlying components will never be as cheap or as easy to wire as a simple touchscreen control. Other car companies followed suit, because Tesla made a method of reducing their own manufacturing costs hip, so many of them jumped on it.

But, Tesla tablets were designed with the belief that this cost saving is possible because of the delusion that full autonomous self driving is possible with existing hardware through software updates. When self driving didn't happen after a decade of trying, people realized how inconvenient and dangerous it is that the only way to adjust the AC, stereo volume, and sideview mirrors while driving is through a tablet with no tactile feedback. So now, we are finally seeing that trend reversing.

[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 year ago

Especially when the buttons move around in the GUI after an update so you accidentally press the wrong ones, or end up having to search the menus while driving.

Perhaps this could change when we have mainstream tactile displays, but until then buttons will always be better.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I think using a car tablet is equally as dangerous as texting and driving. Voice control would actually be better for adjustments while driving.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can we complain more about subscription paywalled car functions then?

[-] snaggen@programming.dev 71 points 1 year ago

What?!? Pictures Under Glass turns out not to be the most desired solution for controling your car? Who could have guessed? /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] A_Porcupine@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

Thank god. This is literally the worst thing about my car (apart from the lane assist trying to kill me).

[-] snaggen@programming.dev 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I found that a homicidal lane assist, have a really good effect on my alertness. Before lane assist I could relax and almost doze of, but with lane assist I don't dare to relax for a second since I know it will try to murder me the first chance it gets. So, I guess that is why people say lane assist prevents accidents.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] havocpants@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

My car lets you turn off lane assist, it's the collision avoidance that I can't turn off that is trying to kill me. Randomly I'll be driving along when an alarm sounds and it tries to swerve off the road. It's fucking infuriating and dangerous and despite many of us complaining to the manufacturer you can't turn it off.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] yuki2501@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago

Seems the novelty VW engineers had to be reminded of the first item in the Unix philosophy:

Make each program do one thing, and do it well.

Buttons already had this. Each single button did one and only one thing: Turn a feature on or off, or in the case of the radio, switch stations.

We didn't need complicated menus to navigate. Press the appropriate button, and voilá. It was simple. It worked.

Who the fuck came up with the idea of having to use touch menus? I have no idea, but I really hope they got fired.

[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

the more important thing here is that you can find and press a button without looking at it

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Dickarus@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

I like how you can get a ticket for using your phone while driving, so automakers decided to replace your tactile radio, where you don't need to look at it to operate, with what is basically a giant touchscreen phone in your car where you need to look at it to see what you're doing instead of feeling what you're doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] popcap200@lemmy.ml 51 points 1 year ago

I test drove one, and the touch buttons were ass, but nobody mentions the lag. There's ZERO feedback, do you press the button again and watch the screen show you turn the thing on and then back off.

I would NEVER buy a car with touch controls based on this experience. It was horrible.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 50 points 1 year ago

You want buttons back because they're easier to use

I want them back because I think car interiors look bland without them

We are not the same...alright I also want them back for the first reason aswell.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gerula@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

This is actually very good news for car manufacturers.

Touch crap was cheaper but sold a new tech so => price increase

Buttons are old tech so no new investments or tech development but they are more complicated => price increase

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 23 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I've been making this argument a LOT with recent discussions on kids not understanding keyboards and controllers because their lives are full of touchscreens.

Touch isn't "the future". It just absolutely flooded the market.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] arc@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Carmakers did this to copy Tesla, not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks and to hell with the person who suffer a degraded or unsafe driving experience as a result. Witness how Tesla even removed indicator stalks, making it all but impossible for people to safely and legally navigate a roundabout. Who cares if someone crashes, because it's all about the bottom line.

[-] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

not realising that Tesla did it to save themselves a few bucks

I guarantee you they realized that and likely did it for the same reason.

I'm hoping by the time I need a new car, this insanity will have passed, allowing me to skip it. It's like everyone skipped Windows Vista.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nothatnow@sopuli.xyz 37 points 1 year ago

Finally people are starting to see that touch screens or any other touch surfaces don't belong into cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] serpineslair@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Real buttons in a car are good because you don't have to fucking look at them to know what you're doing, unlike a god damn touch screen, so your eyes can remain on the road.

[-] cheeseblintzes@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Thank god.

Touchscreens in a car never made any sense.

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

i like buttons

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I might be the one of the weirdos that want buttons back on phones as well lol. 💀 I loved keyboards.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
1856 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

60042 readers
2349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS