687
Against Lemmy Karma (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by gylotip@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world

There is already a total count of up- and downvotes, but please never add karma to Lemmy. We don't want to deal with karma farmers and minimal karma requirements to post. I don't care about the moderation issues because karma brought more harm than good. Please never add that bloody dreadful thing to Lemmy. I already saw a bunch of people supporting adding karma to Lemmy, which will turn Lemmy into a cheap Reddit clone and karma-farming hell. Please, never add karma to Lemmy. I beg you. No more karma hell.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna make my own instance with karma...once you hit a set limit your account is locked forever and your ip blocked for 30days...

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Soon: "Karma's getting too high. Time to go a'trolling!"

[-] glorious_albus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You're banned after you get 300 positive votes, irrespective of how many negatives you have. Easy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Krompus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

That's a great idea.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thefocker@lemmy.world 73 points 1 year ago

I’m a Reddit mod. I absolutely needed to filter users by karma AND account age. The amount of bot posts is exhausting and impossible to keep up with without a filtering method. If the fediverse continues to grow, something will need to be implemented here too.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Have you ever thought that perhaps the reason that that there are so many bots posts on reddit is because of karma?

What exactly makes account with high karma trustworthy when we all know it can be easily botted and then sold?

[-] Renacles@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

That could have been the reason there were so many bots though, every new bot account needed to karma farm in order to become useful.

[-] New_account@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Why? You should let each post stand on it's own merit.

First, account age is silly for Lemmy, as almost 100% of people on here will have an account creation date in June 2023 or later because this place was a ghost town before Reddit decided to kill the APIs. A month from now, is someone with an August 2023 join date automatically presumed to be a troll, or are they just someone making the switch from Reddit a month later than everyone else?

As for karma, neither negative karma nor positive karma really tell you anything about the poster:

For instance, people can make good faith arguments advocating for conservative political opinions, but because the user base skews pretty far left here, those arguments will be downvoted. A discussion forum that bans opposing viewpoints is useless, and the echo chambers on Reddit are something I'd love to avoid here.

Similarly, it's also possible to effortlessly build positive karma. Simply copy/paste highly rated comments from the last time a common repost appeared on the feed, and chances are, your copy/pasted comments will get upvoted too. You can even automate it with a bot.

Karma meant nothing at Reddit, and moderators shouldn't be using it for decisionmaking purposes. It's useful for ranking posts and comments, but anything beyond that isn't helpful.

[-] Eldritch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Karma is largely useless. As others have said. Let an accounts posts stand for themselves. Not their general popularity. Just because someone is downvoted on the whole doesn't mean they're a troll. It just means their ideas are unpopular. But not necessarily wrong.

[-] BuddhaBeettle@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Kbin already counts upvotes and boosts, similar to reddit karma.
But it could perhaps be something that stays hidden for everyone but yourself and moderators (provided you are participating in their magazine, otherwise anyone could open a magazine to see everyone elses karma)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Darc@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can’t say I agree. I miss karma. Not because I want it, because I don’t care. But that imaginary internet point sure drives a lot of content - and even repeat content has a purpose to drive platform growth. I had like 1,000 subs and FREQUENTLY saw something for the first time that the tHiS iS a RePoSt people came out of the woodwork for.

[-] joeri@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

Don’t worry, reposting will happen with or without karma! 😜

[-] cornbread@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

Not a bad thing imo. Not everyone spends all day on the internet. I probably spend more time than most people and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen a meme that’s new to me and half the comments are bitching about it being a repost.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] beefbaby182@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

You know something? Until you mentioned it with this thread, I hadn't even noticed that karma wasn't a thing here. That is how useless the karma system is.

I say let the community mostly manage itself through the voting, so the mods can only step in for the really bad stuff.

[-] notsofunnycomment@mander.xyz 29 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm missing something, but what was Karma more than upvotes minus downvotes?

[-] gylotip@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The votes were not equal to karma. Karma wasn't just subtracting downvotes from upvotes. They made a function that not every up- and downvote changed karma. It was a weird mathematical function. Karma was also used to limit you from posting on some subreddits. That's the reason why I heavily dislike karma.

[-] substill@vlemmy.net 27 points 1 year ago

Karma was originally visible raw upvote / downvote tally. Reddit just obscured the upvote and downvote numbers to discourage manipulation for karma.

Limiting participation based on karma didn’t happen for a long time. By the time some huge subreddits took that step, it (or some other gatekeeping) was necessary to filter a lot of malicious users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

It prevent things like mass-downvoting from counting much towards karma AFAIK, but that's more/less the idea of karma. The exact way it was calculated had nothing to do with people trying to game it. Minimums to post in communities did mean spamming elsewhere just to be able to post where you wanted though and the economic worth of "trustworthy accounts" made karma a karma an issue. Upvotes - downvotes still functions for the latter purpose. If people decide the fediverse is worth scamming, then farming will be a thing. Right now, its a fairly small niche space with an average user who is more internet-savvy than most mainstream social media users, so its probably not worth the effort of trying to scam here yet...

[-] Socialphilosopher@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

I think that karma is an obstacle to free thought. People prefer to remain silent instead of expressing their opposing opinions while declaring ideas that are more in line with the prevailing opinion of the community than their own in order to gain karma.

[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago

Yup this is exactly why people like it. Nobody disagrees and when they do, you just downvote them to hell.

I think it's primitive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's a very bad idea to have karma as well. It shaped reddits entire conversation structure to be all about karma farming, since people think a high karma number means higher status in the community.

I don't see any positives with it. Let people's comments stand on their own for what they say, not because they have high karma.

[-] 15Redstones@feddit.de 21 points 1 year ago

If someone wants karma they could host a modified instance where every post gets thousands of upvotes for free. Other instances can't really verify whether that's accurate.

[-] Skyrkazm@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Make a meme instance. Where every downvote AND upvote adds points whether its good or bad. Simply have the points called "sandwiches." Don't release it until next year on April fools.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] curiosityLynx@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry to tell you that an equivalent of Karma existed from the very beginning (though rather than being Upvotes minus Downvotes, it was Boosts minus Downvotes until a few days ago due to a bug). It's called Reputation and you can see it by viewing someone's profile in kbin. At the time of writing this, your Reputation points seem to be at 443. Reputation isn't being used for anything though, and while it can technically be tracked by anyone, lemmy hides that information so far.

[In fact, you can see who gave up- or downvotes to something and you can also see what someone up- or downvoted (or boosted, but that's a given, since boosting is equivalent to retweeting). This information is out there for anyone to access who spins up their own instance due to how federation works, so the developer of kbin decided to make it public so people are at least aware of this fact.]

[-] NotAPenguin@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Reputation is a kbin specific thing

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry to tell you that an equivalent of Karma existed from the very beginning (though rather than being Upvotes minus Downvotes, it was Boosts minus Downvotes until a few days ago due to a bug). It's called Reputation and you can see it by viewing someone's profile in kbin.

kbin is rather new to the scene afaik, so I wouldn't say reputation has been a part of it since the beginning, but the upvote/downvote records have probably been public since the beginning (idk), so calculating some karma equivalent with whatever preferred metric you wanted was always technically possible, but not socially relevant since average people wouldn't do such.

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wasn't the minimal karma requirement so someone couldn't just make a new account and immediately hop back into a subreddit they were banned from to cause more issues? New accounts should only see that issue one time.....

Anyway, that whole thing isn't really useful here anyway, because i'm pretty sure if you host your own server you could just manipulate it to whatever you want it to be.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Stanley_Pain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago

I've already seen people crying about their posts not getting upvotes or whatever. People will do the stupidest things for magic Internet points.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

tbf it's still important because it what decides if and how long you show up under Hot, which means more eyes and discussion on your post

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I have never been sure what the point of caring about karma is. Pretty much it only gives a rough idea of how long an account has been open and how active it's been. 5, 50,000, 500,000? 5 Million? Who cares. It's not like you can do anything with it besides see the number change. I never have really seen anyone comparing karma or caring about other people's scores.

The only real thing it did was set a way for subs to disallow posting by new/troll accounts. There could easily be a way for lemmy to calculate a sum of votes on someone's most recent posts if people thought that was a useful or desired feature.

[-] theragu40@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It was a way for people to visibly see some kind of validation. Whether it was validation that their ideas were appreciated, or validation that their trolling was successfully pissing people off, validation that someone simply saw and acknowledged their thoughts, or something else...I believe people intrinsically like assigning a visible numeric score to their efforts.

I'm not arguing for karma, and certainly not arguing for it here. But I understand why people like it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Lmao... The TOTAL karma one had was never important. They will still look at how many upvotes is next to their comment, because that's a measure of attention. They still want attention.

It won't make a difference if you can see your total karma or not, ppl will farm upvotes.

[-] Jellojiggle@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

I also hope awards are never added. Reddit had sooooo many and it was really annoying in the end with all the flashy, distracting “awards” on the comment sections.

[-] Flemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I like karma - gamification is fun, humans like watching number go up

I think the answer is to localize it. Maybe community/server based, maybe make it bleed off with time, maybe do all of these and use statistics to come up with a way to make the metric useful somehow

What we don't need is karma done badly, and there's a lot of far more important things to worry about first - I think we should put it way on the back burner and wait for an elegant proposal for how to handle it

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm fine with the count as it is now

[-] GustavoM@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Amen. There is not a single purpose for a "karma counter" to exist other than to promote toxic behavior between other users.

"But what about griefers?!"

Report button exists for a reason -- you don't need to bust a griefer twice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jon@lemmy.tf 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Karma/reputation is currently a thing here, it just isn't rendered in Lenny's UI. Memmy and Mlem for iOS both show totals on the user profile page. You have 806 post reputation, for example

[-] OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I am very much against the karma system. However, I respect others' desires to have it. The fortunate thing about the fediverse is that if we don't want karma we can use an instance that doesn't use karma, and vice versa.

[-] Myro@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Agree. Useless feature and promotes trash content.

[-] InvaderDJ@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I think the fact you said you don't care about moderation issues kind of shows the disconnect. On reddit, karma was a crucial way to moderate. I think something similar is a good idea for federated replacements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 10 points 1 year ago

Lemmy actually tracks karma. It just doesn't show it anywhere.

But as an admin I can dig in the database and see people's karma if I felt like it

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Otakat@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

The Reddthat instance that I'm on also has disabled down voting which I'm also all for. On Reddit, down voting very often became a tool for vocalizing what you disagreed with rather than a low effort or inappropriate post.

[-] 1jl@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I am MAJORLY against disabling downvoting. This results in VERY toxic comments and content being pushed to the front and click bating content, which is what was witnessed on YouTube and Facebook, and is still a major problem. This is because youtube and other sites measure popularity of content not just by upvotes but by interaction. If you click on and/or comment on something, that's interaction. Youtube does not care about the quality of content and comments, so long as it is interacted with and shared. This means that inflammatory comments and content and click bate get lots of angry comments and rage clicks and click bait gets clicked because it's click bait and it registers and popular content that will generate lots of interaction so it gets pushed to the forefront. On reddit this kind of content gets largely weeded out by a quality check, downvotes. While no system is perfect, this allows the community to say "no, ok, just because I clicked on this and maybe even left a comment, this is NOT good content, and should not be shared with others." It also is a natural scam and spam filter that allows the community to quickly shoot down anything that is obviously spam.

Youtube comments were extremely toxic for this exact reason for a long time after the change. They had to implement a lot of changes to help reduce that toxicity, and probably went back to considering the downvotes despite not showing the count.

load more comments (1 replies)

Hear hear 👏 Don’t post for the glory.

The content you’re putting into the fediverse should be for everyone. You no longer own it.

[-] T0rrent01@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'll play devil's advocate: one benefit I could see to Reddit's karma system is that it can quickly filter out spam or alt accounts from more serious communities.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

The first thing all spambots on reddit does now is repost comments in sports subreddits to build up karma, so it really doesn't help much.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
687 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

11944 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse and Feddit Lemmy Community Browser!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS