35
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, “I don’t want to say gay and intersex people shouldn’t be allowed to vote, but I do want it to happen.”

Anyways I’m sterile and drive the most fuel efficient vehicle practical, don’t eat meat, and have made other sacrifices for future generations to have a habitable planet. Musky here has a private jet and at least one of his kids hates him

[-] Tyson712@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Stop. Feeding. The. Troll!

[-] zerocool@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Point would be that if you have kids you have skin in the game and would make more responsible choices with your vote. Same has been said about military service, which also makes a lot of sense. Not practically, of course, but the point highlights the fact that we could have people who are unqualified to make decisions, even if its electing officials, making decisions that impact everyone, including and maybe more importantly, the generations to come.

In a true democracy there is no mechanism for qualifiying or handling quality control for the voting population, and so for elected officials and their policies. This is why we are a democratic republic, and Elon is just saying if you're going to be involved in electing officials you should have skin in the game.

We already have requirements to voting and if you think about it, they are in the same spirit.

[-] Pika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

at this point I'm not surprized, he gives a GIVE ME ATTENTION vibe hardcore, everything he does is against cultural standard.

[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey why stop there? Let's also not allow voting for people that have been disowned by their kids like musk has. And no voting for religious people who think earth is just a pit stop before heaven/hell so there's no need to improve life on earth at all.

[-] bappity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

FrEe SpEeCh

[-] Elpinchepana@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, only the desperate, finantially dependent on shitty jobs to feed their youngling should vote. Only them and the wealthy people that provide said shitty jobs. That will surely save what little democracy is left. You know what? People that make as much money as Musk should not be allowed to vote or to donate in order to influence campaings. These dudes have no real nationality, they are not tied anywhere and don’t have the best interest of any nation at heart. Billionaires are practically a walking, talking, foreign power operating within your country’s borders with almost total impunity. A self-deluded eugenecist foreign power at that.

[-] sci@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

What happened to free speech absolutist

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Does this apply to boomers who no longer have kids that are under the age of 18? You mean they still get to vote? Then fuck off Elon no one wants to buy your stupid tesla coils.

[-] CynicalMillennial@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They took our ability to have children through monetary strain, caused by corporate greed, now they think we should lose voting rights lol...

[-] zgasma@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

I support 100% tax over $1 billion. If you can't manage on a billion dollars, the rest would be better spent on others, anyway.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's generally just beneficial for ultra high tax rates as wealth goes up. That's what actually incentivizes "trickle down economics". As the uber wealthy approach the tax limit it stops making sense for them to horde the wealth. And, instead of letting the tax man get it most of them decide to put their money back into the businesses or charities or whatever.

[-] sci@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don't actually have 1 billion dollars tho, they have stocks with an estimated value of 1 billion dollar. I don't think there's an effective way to tax that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MrFlamey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

At this point I have finally realised that Elon Musk is an attention-seeking cunt and we should probably start to just ignore him, at least for a while.

However, I've got some ideas! Instead of people without children, how about we restrict the vote to the children themselves? How does that sound, Elon? Nobody over 20 should get a vote because they only have... pthh, I dunno, a few decades, 90 years at most left on this planet, so fuck them. Am I right? Maybe we could give everyone a voting point for every year they have left assuming an average lifespan of 75 years - perhaps women could have more points as they generally live longer. That would be fair, no? We should also completely take money out of politics and stop billionaires and large corporations from undermining democracy too! Don't you think that's a great idea?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't want people to ignore him. I want him in the news every day, pissing people off and agitating the masses.

Every time Musk opens his mouth the screams "eat the rich!" get louder. Why on Earth would I want that to stop?

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Why do republicans hate freedom so much?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skellener@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Republicans sure are obsessed with eliminating people’s voting rights. So let’s remove all Republicans from office instead by voting them out in the next election. ✊

[-] JoYo@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I would have a kid just to vote then ditch the poor bastard at twitter HQ.

[-] penix@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Elon Derangement Syndrome

[-] nbafantest@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Don't non-parents have more stake in the future than parents? Parents always need immediate help, they don't care about the long term consequences, that will be faced in 10, 25, 50 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] klay@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I feel like "has children" probably correlates with "has stable income", which makes this classism by another name.

[-] FUCKINGHONSE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think it has more to do with the massive reduction in the reserve labor army in the last few years due to people dying of and becoming disabled by COVID. The remaining labor force is smaller and is therefore better able to negotiate higher wages and better working conditions, while employers are left scrambling to fill empty positions, especially in industries that have historically been awful to work in like retail and food service. Forcing and coercing reproduction will lead to an increased reserve labor army, reduce the power of workers collectively and individually, and reduce the number of workers who are able to participate in disruptive organization (ie unionization) purely due to a lack of surplus time and resources. It also has the effect of oppressing those of us labeled "women" due to our bodies being the means of reproduction, which is a win for the right wing in particular both economically and ideologically.

[-] ChexMax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think the literal opposite is true.

"In 2021, women in households with an income below the poverty threshold had the highest birth rate at 72 births per 1,000 women."

https://www.statista.com/statistics/562541/birth-rate-by-poverty-status-in-the-us/#:~:text=This%20statistic%20shows%20the%20birth,72%20births%20per%201%2C000%20women.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1726 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS