176
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 133 points 11 months ago

“It only took us three years, but we’ve finally achieved the full game we should have delivered on day 1.”

[-] seriousslayerguy@sh.itjust.works 76 points 11 months ago

At least they didn't abandon it. The game was great on PC(v1.4, v1.6) apart from some minor bugs(NOT game breaking bugs).

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 57 points 11 months ago

It doesn’t change the fact that they over promised and under delivered and still raked in pre orders.

Until consumers figure out how to be patient, this is a trend in gaming that is going to continue. To NOT criticize it at every opportunity is doing yourself and every other gaming enthusiast a huge disservice.

[-] filister@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

That's why I always buy after release and usually wait for some discounts. But I plan to buy BG3 even if it's not discounted at the winter sale but I think it is pretty obvious that this game is pretty good already.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

It was a good game, just it fell well short of expectations. When you compare the little systems that contribute to games by R* like rdr2 / gta5 feeling so detailed and alive, it felt a bit barren, despite all the gorgeous backdrop and cool abilities.

"mile wide, inch deep" would be how I described it. The story was excellent but the gameplay loop imo needed some work.

Have you played the new version / dlc yet (I've not so pls no spoilery spoilers)?

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

In fairness, I hated rdr2 and don't really like the gta games because they're a bit too much "violent life simulator" vs "game" for me.

As such, the only thing I hated about CP2077 was the bugs, crashes, and balance issues. Admittedly, I loved how cheap I got it because I bought it during the early reputation crash. It was unplayable for a few weeks, but for $17? Damn.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah for $17 it'd be an absolute steal, assuming it's playable. Iirc it didn't crash once for me, just there were sooooo many ridiculous graphical bugs, and so many systems just felt half-arsed or unfinished. Some notable examples for me:

  • looking out over the city from a high point, zooming in on the traffic and finding out they're sprites

  • no real police / law system, you could have your back to a wall and they'd somehow teleport behind you

  • on my first cyberpsycho case, as the "Thanks for work, I'll take it from here" call didn't trigger until leaving the area, I was unsure of what to do with the knocked-out psycho, so I carried them to the trunk of my car. Well, the game did not account for my idiocy and there were, let's just say, interesting spaghettification results when I drove away

  • the autodrive when calling your car often had hilarious or strange results

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

It was a solid 7/10 at launch and a clear 10/10 in the state it is in today. The new additions are fantastic and complete the experience imo.

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

I love CP2077, but there's no way it was a 7/10 when it crashed every 30 minutes for most people and a significant percent of the quests broke. People (rightly) give flak to Bethesda on how buggy they released games in the past, but CP2077 was arguably buggier than that on release.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 26 points 11 months ago

Here are the wheels to the car you bought 3 years ago.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Uhhh I seriously doubt it’s even close to what they said it was going to be

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

No it's not. I mean I like the game that it is and even had fun at launch but I will always be a little salty that it will never be what they said it would be.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

No, but I find it’s fun. Looks great and I love the genre

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I did a complete playthrough on release and still had fun. The game is still buggy, but it's definitely better than it was and I've had a good time on my second playthrough.

[-] slaacaa@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Fans must feel honored for the chance to beta test the game for a year after paying 60 for it.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 5 points 11 months ago

Good thing I haven't played more than a few hours yet. Imma give this another shot over the holidays I think.

[-] rambaroo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Should they have all worked more crunch time instead?

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 months ago

No. They should not have released an unfinished game. You know, the game they advertised and sold to people before release.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BongRipsMcGee420@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

If my years in a technical field have taught me anything, it's that this half-cooked shit sandwich was made by people in sales and management who were all promoted for making the shareholders happy. It's always up to the engineers to slap some shit together that they just learned about yesterday and was needed last week.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quams69@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago

3 years after release, here's a finished product

Lmao the absolute state of the gaming industry

[-] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 46 points 11 months ago

They should have called it the 2080 edition.

[-] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you like shooters and cyberpunk stories: Yes.

The shooting is great, the world is cool as fuck to explore, and the story is on point for the genre.

If you don't like shooters or cyberpunk/sci-fi as a genre it probably won't change your mind. The gameplay isn't mind-blowing; it's pretty average though the combat somewhat reminds me of Dishonored except without teleportation and time manipulation other than bullet time. The story is mostly well-written, but there's one jarring plot hole about half-way through the main story, and the pacing is a little weird when it comes to interacting with Johnny because of the open-world nature; the dialogue, though, is good throughout.

As an RPG it's very light. You have choices, and they matter and some of those choices you make by leaving dialogue and just doing something (like shooting a machine or just leaving the area). But you don't get these all the time, and when you do you have like 3 or 4 options. The skill tree is big, but it's also a mess (even now after it's been reworked twice.) I always find myself overwhelmed by how many options there are, but underwhelmed by what they actually give.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

What's the plot hole again? It's been a while since I played.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yeah, it's really fun. If it worked for you on release, it was fun then too, with some issues. Now? Absolutely a blast.

[-] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I went in completely blind, knowing just the name and it's a future shooter. It's cool, I did side quests as they became available (ignoring storyline) and I think that's the best way to do it, vs story first then side.

I'm disabled so played with a mouse only (kb for menus etc). I had a good time start to finish, and I only fucked up one side-quests (kinda mission design, kinda being an idiot). I haven't played in a couple years, want to see what the new content is, just been hooked on other games.

I know the game "fell short" of hype but idc because I was interested and very very intentionally ignored all the hype bullshit. I feel I got my money's worth, and enjoyed everything so far (story complete, all side as of 2y ago).

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 17 points 11 months ago

Is there any difference between the ultimate edition and just having the game+DLC?

[-] marauder@feddit.de 17 points 11 months ago

Update 2.1 for the game and the DLC is the ultimate edition. So if you are on the new patch you have the same content.

[-] ganoo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 11 months ago

Did they fix the writing/dialogue?

[-] kryllic@programming.dev 8 points 11 months ago

That's arguably one of the few things that was fine at launch

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zellith@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

So did they fix the ps4 and xbone editions?

[-] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Xbone, I like that!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
176 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16722 readers
364 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS