703

As always, the paying user has the worst experience. "Purchase" a show, can only watch on a certain console of a certain brand, no transfers, no backups, then it suddenly disappears from the library and nothing can be done.

If media companies insist on draconian DRM, then they should pay for full refunds to their loyal customers when one day they decide to delist that specific show.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] netchami@sh.itjust.works 126 points 2 years ago
[-] TheLobotomist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago

Cool tattoo idea!

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 86 points 2 years ago

Absolutely insane.

I can understand extreme cases, like some sort of disputed IP where their contact to sell the content turns out not to be with the actual rights holder, resulting in no longer serving the content (with an unconditional full refund). But past that they should be legally required to host the content until the heat death of the universe.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Give it another 10 years, you won’t “own” anything. It’ll be “licensed.” Weird tho. Digital content is endless. But you can’t consume it into extinction; physical things are finite, but we’re like here take it! It’s yours! Call a cop or shoot anyone trying to take it.

Seems backwards to me.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kindenough@kbin.social 57 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"We sincerely thank you for your continued support."

As in stfu and keep giving us money?

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago

Looks perfectly translated to me

[-] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 43 points 2 years ago

Now THAT is stealing.

[-] the16bitgamer@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Alright, what this looks like is Sony's deal with Discovery to sell and host their TV shows has been removed. From my quick glance there are no games being removed.

Still is BS, and beyond ridiculous. But it was inevitably going to happen at some point.

I am more pissed that I got informed that they are doing this from here instead of being told that I am losing my Myth Busters.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

But it was inevitably going to happen at some point.

If you believed this, wtf would you ever give them your money to begin with???

[-] the16bitgamer@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Because it was 2009, I was I kid, and I saw Mythbusters and I said yes. I learnt my lesson when they remove PlayStation Video years ago from PS3, and the PSP. I didn't even know I could re-download it until I stumbled upon it in a menu years later.

I am just hoping and praying that this will not extend to their games. Sony's been pretty good about game ownership to this point, look at those who bought the PT Demo and can still play it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"But you only ever owned a usage-license, which we now suspended" strawman argument incoming.

Well duh, then i don't have "buyed" but rented it. Usage of those terms by platforms should be sued as misleading.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 years ago

I look forward to the class action suit, and the $14 check I'll get in the mail.

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 40 points 2 years ago

And this is why I never “buy” media online. If I can’t own the media and enjoy the content whenever and wherever I want, it’s rented. I may be ok with that, but I never let them claim that it was a sale.

[-] crit@links.hackliberty.org 14 points 2 years ago

Buy it for the convenience and for the good Devs, pirate it after if they try taking it away. You already paid for it

[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 9 points 2 years ago

Exactly.

It's much the same as creators in Second Life who don't want to sell in the Opensim metaverse. I get where they're coming from in terms of protecting a recurring revenue stream, but if the customer has already paid for the product once, under first sale doctrine, they have the right to continue using it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sterben@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago

That's one reason why Piracy will always exist, am I right?

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 years ago

It’s why it must exist.

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

God, I hope these bastards get sued 'cause little doubt they won't be refunding the poor schmos who've just been robbed of their property.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

If I’m to believe I own the crap I buy that’s digital delivery, then if they want to take it back, they need to buy it from me at my price.

[-] DeathWearsANecktie@lemm.ee 21 points 2 years ago

Fucking assholes. This is why piracy is justifiable, and in some cases, even necessary.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This won't change until someone sells a yacht to a Senator with fine print that it's only a perpetual license. Then comes back 3 years later and takes the yacht citing the fine print in the contract.

[-] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

If I purchased it, do I get store credit for losing what I bought?

[-] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

That's funny. You should do stand-up

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Yes, but since it's "used", you get .1 percent what you paid for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 12 points 2 years ago
[-] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Discovery Entitlements Affected Titles

As of 31 December 2023, due to our content licensing arrangements with content providers, you will no longer be able to watch any of your previously purchased Discovery content and the content will be removed from your video library.

We sincerely thank you for your continued support.

Thank you,

PlayStation Store

[-] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Turns out you people didn't actually purchase it.

I wonder if anywhere in the "purchase" terms they included "while Sony holds the license to distribute."

I hate that "purchases" people make are restricted per platform. If I "purchase" a specific title it should be available on any and all platforms that serve that content. No one should be asked to purchase it on Sony. Apple, Netflix, Amazon, or whatever other shitty streaming service comes out.

As much as I think nfts are fucking retarded, this could be one of the few cases where that stupid digital receipt might make sense.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DestroyerOfWorlds@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

just got my multi season science fiction show downloaded via the salty seas. apparantly it would cost $50-85 to download or stream from the "legit" vendor. A vendor that bought the rights and closed the ability to access previous seasons. So, not going well for the loyal customers.

[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

almost like "purchasing" it was the real crime.

[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

That list of shows that's being removed is huge too.

God I hope people reconsider purchasing products from companies that do these kind of things to them.

At some point you think if they get smacked up the side of their heads enough times that they will actually wake up and do something about it.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 years ago

Scrolling through the list I can't believe that people actually watch that shit, let alone pay for it.

It's all the kind of crap that people leave used to leave on in the background and to get bombarded with 4 sets of adverts an hour. The direct result of needing to fill 200 channels as cheaply as possible.

Refunding everyone would probably cost Sony less than a million. I'd wager some of those shows nobody has ever purchased.

[-] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

You don't like it which is fine but no need to call out people who do. My dad loves deadliest catch and has been watching it for years, he records it and then fast forwards through the ad breaks something that's been around 10 years now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] noobdoomguy8658@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

That's 1318 items, according to that table, counting by seasons. Insane.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
703 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62574 readers
1144 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS