150
submitted 11 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
Two Hamas members kill three in morning rush hour attack
Attackers were brothers, shot dead at the scene
Attack comes on seventh day of Gaza truce

JERUSALEM, Nov 30 (Reuters) - Two Hamas gunmen killed three people at a Jerusalem bus stop during morning rush hour on Thursday, and Israel reiterated its commitment to wiping out the Palestinian Islamist faction, whose Oct. 7 killing spree triggered the Gaza war.

The attackers, Palestinians from East Jerusalem, were shot dead by off-duty soldiers and an armed civilian, police said. At least eight people were also wounded in the shooting.

"The terrorists arrived at the scene by car in the morning, armed with an M-16 rifle and a handgun," police said. "The terrorists began shooting at civilians before subsequently being killed at the scene."

Hamas, which is sworn to Israel's destruction, claimed responsibility for the Jerusalem attack, deeming it "heroic".

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 81 points 11 months ago

Obviously trying to goad Israel into deeper conflict. Hamas doesn’t give a fuck about Palestinians.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

that may very well be what those that are pulling-the-strings or providing the funding want.. all-out war vs Israel.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

very well may be

Yes that is literally the reason Hamas exists.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 53 points 11 months ago

Hamas sure does like attacking civilians.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

THiS IS whAT DEColoniZATIon LoOks LikE!

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It's what an insurgency looks like, proto isreali terrorist groups did literally the same shit.

[-] anarchost@lemm.ee 23 points 11 months ago

And Israel sure does love culling up to 1.3% of the population of Gaza

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 15 points 11 months ago

Israel's military actions are far too broad and far too disproportionate of a response. They should be allowed to defend their civilians though, however what they are doing now goes way beyond defense.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 18 points 11 months ago

It's far easier to target those that can't or won't fight back.

[-] interceder270@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

They don't have a choice. Either kill civilians or get crushed by the military.

Or give up, which is what Israel and most of the Western world wants to happen.

[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

It's especially stupid because it hardens the Israeli people even more against hamas and makes them less willing to work with Palestinians when their government members do stuff like this.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

That is literally the point. Violent extremist movements are directly incentivized to make peaceful solutions impossible so that they remain as the only possible option and thus retain power.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Not stupid if the plan is to get Israel to retaliate and pull more factions in

[-] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 8 points 11 months ago

Isn't this just revenge for the two Palestinian children killed a few days ago? https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/29/israel-kills-two-children-in-latest-raid-on-jenin-refugee-camp

I still don't condone murder of civilians, but it's not just for the fun of it.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 39 points 11 months ago

Hamas, which is sworn to Israel’s destruction, claimed responsibility for the Jerusalem attack, deeming it “heroic”.

So long as one side is very deliberately planning and praising the explicit targeted murder of civilians, this isn't going to end.

Israel is absolutely doing a lot of harm and it's by no means any kind of angel, but what it doesn't do is this. There is a meaningful difference between collateral damage and deliberate murder of civilians (even if that's not going to be any consolation to anybody affected by violence, of course)

[-] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 20 points 11 months ago

I may get downvoted for this, but I don't know that I fully agree.

Collateral damage implies there were valid military targets being struck.

I know Hamas doesn't exactly have bunkers and sandbags to shoot at, but the imagery coming out of Gaza looked a lot like an entire nation rolling up to a metaphorical bus stop and cutting loose.

There is nothing just about what Hamas is doing or did here, and I'm so tired of having to include this caveat. But using an entire military industrial complex to perpetrate the same acts on a horrific and unimaginable scale doesn't qualify as collateral damage.

[-] Caradoc879@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

I agree. Hamas is evil and needs to be stopped, but Isreal clearly doesn't care about civilian casualties. They don't even seem to be pretending.

This is the definition of over-retaliation. Like if you compare the severity of the atrocities, it's like Hamas slapped Isreal in the face, so Isreal grabbed a hammer and started bludgeoning.

[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Finally someone else says the obvious

[-] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Yeah Israeli leaders are planning and praising the explicit targeted murder of citizens. Netanyahu has supported Hamas for years because it delegitimizes the Palestinian state (and that source is The Times of Israel in case anyone thinks I'm being biased)

It boggles my mind that so many people don't see the far right Israeli government (that is so closely allied with America) is copying the George Bush War on Terror playbook.

I absolutely agree Hamas is a terrorist organization, but what the Israeli government is doing is far more sinister and evil. They're just playing the long game and hiding behind "collateral damage" so they can further their apartheid.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I mean can we mention that the Israeli military literally absorbed multiple terrorist organizations into itself with ribbons patches and metals for..... Killing mostly civilians in the name of Israel.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 8 points 11 months ago

How can you call it "collateral damage" when you drop bombs on an inhabited city? That's intentionally targeting civilians.

[-] OniiFam 2 points 11 months ago

I don't think you know what intentional and/or targeting means.

[-] kemsat@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

They want to start a war so they can all team up together against Israel & remove them from the region.

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

This happened in 1967, when Israel went to war against a coalition of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, and Egypt.

Israel won in six days. It wouldn't go any better a second time.

[-] GeneralVincent@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't be so sure. Things are a little bit different than 1967, and more countries are condemning Israel's numerous war crimes than just those 5 countries

[-] BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

The United States is also much more of a factor now and is not going to let Israel's existence be threatened by nation states. Toss in the US military and we'll get to add the One Day War to Israel's history.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

They don't have a choice. Isreal wants another multi sided war so they can expand again. The US doesn't want to fight a war for single spy station that's of little importance at this point since the only thing tying us to the middle East is... Israel.

[-] JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca 19 points 11 months ago

https://nitter.cz/AsafRonel/status/1730337805593661832

An Israeli civilian stopped both Hamas members and then IDF showed up and executed the civilian (with his hands up, surrendering) because they thought he was Hamas member.

[-] capital@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Damn this sounds exactly like what Bernie was saying.

A cease fire requires both sides to agree.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The attackers, Palestinians from East Jerusalem, were shot dead by off-duty soldiers and an armed civilian, police said.

Israel's Shin Bet security agency identified the gunmen as 30- and 38-year-old brothers who were affiliated with Hamas, which runs Gaza.

"The operation came as a natural response to unprecedented crimes conducted by the Occupation (Israel)," it said in a statement, citing the military offensive in Gaza and the treatment of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli jails.

Israel's far-right minister for police, Itamar Ben-Gvir, told reporters at the site of the attack that it "proves again how we must not show weakness, that we must speak to Hamas only through the (rifle) scopes, only through the war."

Blinken, on his third visit to the region since the war erupted, said Thursday's shooting was a reminder "of the threat from terrorism that Israel and Israelis face every single day ... My heart goes out to the victims of this attack."

The violence came as Israel and Hamas struck a last-minute agreement on Thursday to extend their six-day ceasefire in Gaza by one more day to allow negotiators to keep working on deals to swap hostages held in the enclave for Palestinian prisoners.


The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
150 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2282 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS