25
submitted 11 months ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/anticonsumption@slrpnk.net
top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


So you buy them a solar-powered waving queen; a belly-button brush; a silver-plated ice cream tub-holder; a "hilarious" inflatable Zimmer frame; a confection of plastic and electronics called Terry the Swearing Turtle; or – and somehow I find this significant – a Scratch Off World Map.

For 30 seconds of dubious entertainment, or a hedonic stimulus that lasts no longer than a nicotine hit, we commission the use of materials whose impacts will ramify for generations.

Researching her film The Story of Stuff, Annie Leonard discovered that, of the materials flowing through the consumer economy, only 1% remain in use six months after sale.

Rare materials, complex electronics, the energy needed for manufacture and transport are extracted and refined and combined into compounds of utter pointlessness.

The old excuse, that we must trash the planet to help the poor, simply does not wash. For a few decades of extra enrichment for those who already possess more money than they know how to spend, the prospects of everyone else who will live on this Earth are diminished.

Witness last week's edition of Radio 4's The Moral Maze, in which most of the panel lined up to decry the idea of consuming less, and to associate it somehow with authoritarianism.


The original article contains 857 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

Anticonsumption

345 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS