357
submitted 11 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Cbsnews.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jimbabwe@lemmy.world 85 points 11 months ago

“No way to prevent this” says only planet where this regularly happens

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Can't have oil spills if you don't have any oil

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

I haven’t forgotten how BP used chemicals to make all the oil just sink to the bottom of the gulf so people would forget what they did quicker. We don’t deserve this planet.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 29 points 11 months ago

hey I've seen this episode before

[-] woodenskewer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Just so more people know, South Park was off the mark in their criticism of that. The "We're Sorry" ad campaign was just a form of soft bribery so the media outlets would play softball with their coverage of the disaster.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

oh god i forgot south park did a bit on this. i feel dirty now. was not meant to be a south park reference. just that this shit keeps happening

[-] duplexsystem 3 points 11 months ago

What'd ya mean you've seen it before it's brand new!

:(

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

That reporter/editor should be fined or charged with this blatant bullshit.

"The U S. Coast Guard said Monday that an estimated 1.1 million gallons of crude oil has leaked into the Gulf..." and linked the actual press release in that line.

When you actually read the press release, and then lower in the article, it says the amount is actually unknown.

They know how much oil the pipeline holds, which would be around that estimate. It could only be a couple hundred gallons that have actually leaked.

Also they are not even sure where the leak is, so it might not even be the named company's fault.

Yeah oil industry sucks, but this sounds like a fat nothing burger that CBS is pumping for clicks. No wonder no one trusts the media.

(This is a reposted comment from when this bullshit article was posted earlier)

The OP of this repost didn't even have the decency to share the qualifications from inside the article.

They are just as terrible of an attention seeking whore as the writer of the article.

[-] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Ya the actual press release says up to 1.1 millions gallons could have been released with the actual amount unknown. The article is sensationalist, but it still sounds like it could be pretty bad, but we need to wait for more data to find out exactly how bad.

"The volume of discharged oil is currently unknown. The total pipeline length is 67 miles and was closed by MPOG at 6:30 a.m. on Thursday. Initial engineering calculations indicate potential volume of crude oil that could have been released from the affected pipeline is 1.1 million gallons."

https://www.news.uscg.mil/Press-Releases/Article/3593964/update-1-unified-command-monitors-responds-to-mpog11015-incident/

Also as a side note to understand how bad 1 million gallons is, the 2010 BP oil spill released 130 million gallons.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

And if it's unknown it could even be zero, right? Phew, nothing to worry about.

[-] Whoresradish@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It is definitely not 0 and I would still be worried. I just don't apreciate news that exagerates facts.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Somehow, I'm past getting big oil the benefit of the doubt.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Sorry. I read your comment quickly and didn’t realize you were criticizing the original writer. I apologize.

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

For comparison, this is less than 1% of the deepwater horizon spill, and they've turned off the entire pipeline so there's little danger of it increasing in size.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

The danger, as the article says, is letting them continue to operate in the area. At what point do we say "okay we've nearly totally fucked this place up, find someplace else"

[-] steventhedev@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Ideally? Back in 2010 when BP made it clear they were systemically hiding critical safety and environmental control failures.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is right now.

It may be too late to save humanity, but it's never too late to do the right thing.

[-] sartalon@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Any oil spill is terrible, but this article is blatant bullshit, written for clickbait.

[-] Doxatek@mander.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

Comparing a bad thing to another bad thing that was larger doesn't make the lesser not also still a bad thing. Not that you necessarily think that of course but some people use this as a defense quite often. "Like x person in history killed a million people but I only murdered one why are you so mad at me?!How am I bad!" haha

[-] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 11 points 11 months ago

But didn't you all see the commercial on TV promoting Oil and Natural gas as being amazing? This is a good thing right? /S

[-] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 2 points 11 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/channel/UCCdMonKP9K4crNcpdyd3Wcw

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago
[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The other oil spills, the garbage, the global warming, the agricultural runoff, and the microplastics already killed >99% of them. So it's quite possible there are not any more (Endangered Species) left in the entire ocean.

So yeah ~~allegedly~~ I mean potentially

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

Yay! We don't have to care anymore!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

The inevitable sequel to "drill baby drill" entitled "spill baby spill" was not enjoyed as enthusiastically as the oil companies had hoped.

[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Turns out, building your entire economy and financial system on O&G causes problems for the environment, huh?

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Username checks out.

[-] danhab99@programming.dev 7 points 11 months ago

Again? Isn't this whole sea contaminated yet? What can possibly still be there?

[-] fender_symphonic584@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Thanks. That was helpful.

[-] TheWanderer@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago

Let's fucking goo! Another one! A big boost for Any% world destruction Speedrun.

[-] redditLIFE@fanaticus.social 4 points 11 months ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


On Facebook, the Coast Guard said that oil was "skimmed and sampled" roughly four miles southeast of South Pass, Louisiana on Friday, at which point they retrieved about 210 gallons of "oily-water mixture."

Matt Rota, senior policy director for Healthy Gulf, told CBS affiliate WWL-TV that the amount of oil thought to have spilled could still increase.

NOAA is helping oversee the incident, and the agency's emergency operations coordinator Doug Helton told WWL that it's not necessarily the amount of oil, but its impact, that is of most concern.

Just north of the spill and Plaquemines Parish lies the Chandeleur Islands, where last year, the world's most endangered sea turtle species, the Kemp's Ridley, was found hatching for the first time in three-quarters of a century.

"Continued oil and gas development in the Gulf represents a clear, existential threat to the whale's survival and recovery," a group of 100 scientists said in a letter to the Biden administration last year.

"The government's Natural Resource Damage Assessment on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill estimates that nearly 20% of Gulf of Mexico whales were killed, with additional animals suffering reproductive failure and disease."


The original article contains 686 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
357 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
2220 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS