13
submitted 11 months ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] graded6827@feddit.uk 9 points 11 months ago

What a stupid shit show this all is. Isreal and Hamas aren’t going to be like “well guys Jess Phillips says we should stop killing each other so let’s chill out.”

The whole vote on calling for a ceasefire is idiotic, and it’s even more idiotic that Starmer imposed the whip. Labour getting bogged down in ideological purity bullshit yet again.

[-] Tamo@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago

Starmer is utterly terrified of getting painted with the anti-semitism brush, and is massively overcompensating as a result

[-] cupcakezealot 1 points 11 months ago

the uk and us are the two biggest countries in the g7. putting pressure on the presumptive next government to push for a policy which holds aid contingent on reducing violence and pushing for a two state solution is exactly what this does.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Keir Starmer faces more resignations from Labour’s frontbench if he does not shift his policy on Gaza, amid growing anger in the party over how he has handled the vote on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The Labour leader suffered the biggest rebellion of his tenure on Wednesday night as 10 frontbenchers resigned or were sacked from his team after voting for a Scottish National party motion that called for a ceasefire.

Sources say several of those who remained loyal and kept their jobs are nonetheless angry about how the issue has been managed, and would be willing to quit if Starmer does not push the government to take a tougher line on Israeli military action in the region.

Rushanara Ali, one of three Muslim frontbenchers to back the party line on Wednesday, said in a statement: “Leaving the shadow government is something I am always willing to do, which is why I completely respect the decisions taken by my fellow MPs today.

The SNP motion, which was introduced as an amendment to the king’s speech, has triggered one of the biggest crises of Starmer’s leadership, with 56 Labour MPs in total defying orders to vote in favour of it rather than abstain.

Starmer and his top officials spent weeks in what one party source called “very, very, tense” negotiations with Labour MPs in the lead-up to Wednesday night as they debated how to respond.


The original article contains 762 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3062 readers
142 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS