887
Primitive (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 11 months ago by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/atheism@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] lauha@lemmy.one 83 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is incorrect. In most Christian churches, Jesus is specifically not a demigod or a separate lesser entity from God. Jesus is God.

Holy trinity is literally one of the most central doctrines of Christianity.

Uneducated pagan mad this meme.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

But if it's a Trinity, why are they listed separately if they're not separate? Why make the distinction if they're one and the same?

Who did God send down to die for our sins? Why does Jesus have a name if he just is god? Why not call him God?

If he is god, why is the resurrection so special? Wouldn't you expect God to be deathless anyway?

I'm half being difficult, half wondering what the real answers are.

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

that's their secret, shit doesn't have to make sense, and each branch can make up its own interpretation for the pesky details

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Are Hannah Montanna and Miley Cyrus not the same person?

[-] kozy138@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Are you the same person you were 15 years ago? Your name is the same. So is your social security number. But those were assigned to you by an external party.

You look different, feel different, act different. Are you the same person you were yesterday?

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

That's like the old ship problem. If I build a ship and then replace every part of it over time, is it still the same ship?

[-] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Ship of Theseus is the problem you’re thinking about

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

if I replace every part of the story is it still the same story though?

[-] jozep@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is what I understood from the teachings of the Catholic Church:

There are sacred mysteries which are not explainable by rational or scientific reasoning and thus believing in these mysteries is the catholic faith.

So the Trinity means God, Jesus and the Holy Spirit are separate and the same.

Resurrection is special because God lived as a human, died to cleanse the sins of all humans (dying is a punishment for the sins) and his resurrection means he is really God, he cannot die and doing so he defeated death itself. Which means all humans believing in God will be able to cheat death and live eternally in paradise.

God died for our sins because he loves humans and wants them to be free of sin.

Trying to understand this through reason is not possible. You need faith, this is the whole shtick.

Again this is my understanding, been a long time since I went to catechism.

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 10 points 11 months ago

Trying to understand this through reason is not possible. You need faith, this is the whole shtick.

This is why I'm not religious. I believe God would have a more elegant solution.

[-] Duranie@midwest.social 4 points 11 months ago

Growing up attending various Protestant churches, the basics re the Trinity was that God is the Father/Creator of everything, the Holy Spirit is essentially His spiritual form, and Jesus was His earthly human form. YMMV by denomination.

[-] overzeetop@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

So…you’re saying it’s ineffable?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Its like voltron, 3 gods make 1 bigger god.

[-] lauha@lemmy.one 6 points 11 months ago

More specifically, they are not one and same. Father is not Son is not Holy Spirit, but all of them are God.

Your questions are better answered by theologicians. I am not even a Christian, but even I know about concept of trinity. Perhaps everything about God is not meant to be comprehensible by humans. God is beyond humans after all.

[-] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

For anyone wondering how this breaks down logically and where the error is:

The position as put here and elsewhere contains logical errors upon clarification. God has parts? Okay what makes the parts unique and discrete? If they aren’t, they aren’t parts of a whole and are equal to the whole.

For example: does the father have the same knowledge as the spirit? The same powers? If yes to these and similar questions, then they all are god and are not discrete. If no, then we don’t have one god at all, we have 3 gods. Also if no, the gods cannot be all knowing or all powerful individually.

I’ve never heard it put like this comment though. Instead I hear that they’re all god. As in, Jesus isn’t 1/3 of god, he is god. And so is the spirit/ghost and father. But if I ask if Jesus is the spirit, they’ll say no. This is an identity flaw. You’re saying that A=D and C=D but A!=C.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is what you're describing and is a good pictograph for explaining why it's nonsense that cannot be presented in any accepted form of propositional logic.

OP commenter got mad at "pagans" for not describing something in terms of a contradictions, while accepting that contradiction on its own terms. Theist mad at accurate meme.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's a secret identity. When trouble strikes, God ducks into a phone booth and becomes the Holy Spirit.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 4 points 11 months ago

The best analogy I've heard so far is that god is like water and trinity is a bit like the aggregate states liquid, solid, gas. They are the same (water) but liquid water is obviously different from ice and steam.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 months ago

Calm down, silly. Did you forget that we're dealing with magic? Now that I've reminded you, everything should be fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] uriel238 11 points 11 months ago

You're still consuming flesh of divinity, which is a pretty grisly, chthonic look.

Personally I'm more interested in the mores and policies of a religion, which Christian ministries generally and the Roman Catholic Church specifically have shown they will discard readily to preserve their wealth and power.

Create a religion in which the members actually practice mercy, kindness and compassion and I will tolerate all their ritual depravities. (Sacrifices of the living in effigy, please.)

[-] LeafOnTheWind@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Well depending on the denomination, it is either seen as literally or figuratively his flesh and blood. Figurative makes a lot more sense: "...do this in the remembrance of me"

[-] uriel238 4 points 11 months ago

As much as I completely agree with your interpretation, Catholic ministers and politicians alike have gotten a bit weird about trans-substantiated wafers, asserting that it has become the real literal flesh of Jesus (though it's grossly offensive if we were to subject a trans-substantiated wafer to scientific tests to see if it's changed from the control).

It reminds me in the late 1980s. In response to the fatwa levied against Salman Rushdie over The Satanic Verses, there was movement to demonstrate Catholic resilience in the face of offense or mockery, and for a while the Catholic community expressed a casual stoicism we attribute to European Jews. It didn't last, and evaporated entirely after the 9/11 attacks.

[-] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

it’s grossly offensive if we were to subject a trans-substantiated wafer to scientific tests to see if it’s changed from the control

Which is funny because the obvious answer is that it instantly transubstantiates back into a cracker if you don't have faith -- which is implied by attempting to test it in any way.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Sort of. Trinitarianism vs Unitarianism is a whole thing.

Then the Unitarians partnered with the Universalists, which was super weird.

UUs are lovely though.

[-] lanolinoil@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

hmmm -- Sure smells like Polytheism to me.

One of my favorite early Christian sects is the Marcions -- They thought with how mean and angry OT God is and how nice and forgiving NT God is, and with God being eternal and all, that they must be DIFFERENT GODS with NT God now being in charge.

Of course, they were swiftly excommunicated for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcionism

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

This just compressed a good several hundred years of religious schisms and theological debate that was sometimes very bloody in sorting itself out. There is also nothing to say if what became popular was actually the correct interpretation as what became "correct" was determined by political power as the religion consolidated often based more on merit of what city the bishop came from and the ecconomic flow of power. Had things gone just a little differently we would be talking about how Jesus is God's direct subordinate or how he is effectively a unique being who is one half human mixed with one half God because he was born of Mary making him half made up of her humanity which would make him a... Demigod.

Also most Christian churches believe a lot of stuff that was somebody's random fad at some point. Like Catholicism and the seven deadly sins. That was ONE guy who started something of a spiritual wellness cult, quit all the sins he made up and died because he ruined his body following his own made up doctrine. It would be like if you let a severe anorexic write the nutritional standards on packaging.

Naw bro the "pagan" in the room ain't the uneducated one. You're just carrying around a couple of millennia of political baggage and refuse to acknowledge how a bit of hubris in the generational game of telephone might have warped your sensibilities. Those first 300 years of power struggle could have hosted some very big misinterpretations since Jesus wasn't very focused on explaining his own lore so much as setting an example in how humanity should behave so flipping out about the trinity and deeming anybody a heretic seems to be kind of missing the point.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eylrid@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

If they want to drink wine and eat crackers while chanting, I ain't gonna kink shame. I don't have a problem with that. It's being controlling and treating people like shit that's the real problem.

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

There's the real "think of the children" moment...

[-] joel_feila@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

You forgot while young boys ring bells.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago

I brought the incense. We can proceed.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

Also, balls.

Alright, they do that one after mass...

[-] Venat0r@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

*while pretending to eat flesh and drink blood while sipping wine and eating miniature dry rice crackers.

[-] aidan@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Catholics use rice crackers?? That sounds so much worse.

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Not always, but for a gluten-free option yes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Jesus is an inverse zombie. Living people eat his dead flesh.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Isn't this how meat consumption usually is?

[-] thorbot@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah Jesus is the main course. Jesus L'Orange is a fuckin delicacy in Spain

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Image Transcription: Tumblr


teaboot

Okay, new rule: if you regularly consume the blood and flesh of a demigod in a room full of chanting elders you're not allowed to call other religions primitive and evil


candidlyautistic

This is oddly specific and leaves some very interesting questions unanswered.


uirgiliana

Catholicism sure does sound weird when you put it that way.

[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatFembyWho 4 points 11 months ago

Dont forget human/child sacrifice, an essential element.

But yes they adapted all of that from the other, "evil" primitive Mesopotamian religions.

[-] Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

The belief that a cosmic Jewish zombie who was his own father can make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh and drink his blood and telepathically tell them that you accept him as your master so he can remove an evil force from your body that is present in humanity because a woman made of a rib was convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical apple tree. And this Jew’s father (who magically impregnated a virgin so she stayed a virgin all without her consent) planned all of this while living in nothingness for eternity and one day got bored of living in nothingness and decided to set this into motion- and hates transgenders.

And if you do not believe all of this without question, he has a special place full of fire, smoke and torture where he will send you to be gangraped through the ass with red-hot spikes by horned red creatures for eternity until the universe’s heat death. But he still loves you, and wants to save you from what he will do to you if you don’t believe in him despite, for a good 2000 years, appearing only in clouds and on toast and allowing his “chosen people” to almost get wiped out by a country-sized murder cult (not to mention everything they went through before that).

Makes perfect sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

If you think this symbolic ritual is bad wait until you find out what actually goes on at a traditional brit milah.

[-] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

After cutting a baby's foreskin off, there's a step in the process called metzizah where they suck blood out of the baby's penis. Most circumcisions don't include that anymore but it's still going on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
887 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

4027 readers
3 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS