29
submitted 1 year ago by narwhal@lemmy.ml to c/usa@lemmy.ml
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sleet01@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

"I got mine, you get fucked," part X of N?

[-] PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

"Why should t have to pay off someone else's loan" - most muricanes.

Yet they pay car insurance etc.

[-] chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Are there any legal experts who could chime in to help me understand the why of this decision?

If these loans are held by the executive branch, why aren't they allowed to cancel their own loans? Is there really a federal law on the books against this?

[-] sleet01@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because these conservative judges are in the bag for the GOP and see an opportunity to hurt two groups of people they really hate:

  1. Democrats,
  2. Students.

Edit: IANAL, just really pissed off.

[-] Rebelappliance@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

1.9 trillion in tax cuts to the top 10%? I sleep. 400 billion in PPP loans forgiven? I sleep. 400 billion in student loans? That's socialism!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7303 readers
293 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS