227
submitted 11 months ago by jlh@lemmy.jlh.name to c/europe@feddit.de

Awful to see our personal privacy and social lives being ransomed like this. €10 seems like a price gouge for a social media site, and I'm even seeing a price tag of 150SEK (~€15) In Sweden.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] morras@jlai.lu 60 points 11 months ago

Price is a thing, but having the option to chose is definitely good.

Now comes the real question: do you really trust the Zuck to implement a "do not share/sell anything" policy ? 'Cause yeah, if I'm paying, I'm expecting that none of my data is being sold/processed/transmitted to another company. Paying to just remove ads is .. pointless.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 8 points 11 months ago

I mean I would argue that the important choice - not use FB/Instagram at all - isn't an option for most people. People's lives depend on this software, a lot of people would have a really hard time connecting with friends or participating in community organizations without access to Meta's locked-in user base.

This is why the option to pay for your own privacy rights is a false choice, and why these gatekeepers need stricter regulation from the EU. These companies make billions in profits from their monopoly positions and privacy rights abuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gajustempus@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

the fact I don't trust this lizardman any farther than I could toss him is the reason I took it as an opportunity to say goodbye to anything Meta-related.

I haven't trust him and his "company" before, I won't start with it now and throw money at him

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

100% this. I'd argue though, that the price point is fair. In 2018, Facebook earned an average of roughly $110 in ad revenue per American user according to this article.

[-] Yamm@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

The price might be fair for american users. The average european user makes Facebook about $60 per year. Sorce: https://www.statista.com/statistics/251328/facebooks-average-revenue-per-user-by-region/

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cjk@feddit.de 49 points 11 months ago

This is a classic. Make the price high enough that nobody wants to pay it, but low enough that law enforcement doesn't complain. Everybody will click on the „I'm Ok with tracking“ button.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 31 points 11 months ago

And for those who pay, they will still probably sell their data to advertisers and hike the prices in 2-3 years.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.de 39 points 11 months ago

Suddenly Lemmy hosting costs seem really low...

[-] nitefox@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Lemmy isn’t a social network like Facebook though

[-] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

Yeah, we don't need to support greedy capitalists, and also all the extra stuff that comes with being an actual company.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 11 months ago

Social media ≠ social lives.

People need to remember this and not give their social lives to private companies.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 12 points 11 months ago

Most of society doesn't realize this yet, sadly.

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.de 30 points 11 months ago

In the case of Facebook, the average value of an active user’s data to Facebook is about $2 per months.

They shouldn't be allowed to charge more than that.

Source

[-] mreiner@beehaw.org 9 points 11 months ago

Respectfully, an article from four years ago that I cannot read in full without creating an account, which seems to just reference a calculator from FT that is over a decade old at this point (whose sources I also cannot seem to find) doesn’t impress me. Do you have anything more recent, preferably that sites sources, that you can share? I’m genuinely interested in what data is actually worth

[-] Don_alForno@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

All valid points. Tbh I'm not on FB or any of meta's services, and I don't care about FB enough to put in more research time. I consider this a data point to start from.

Facebook should be required to show how a single set of a random user's data actually means even close to 13€ a month of revenue for them. This is not a good they willingly put out on the market, this is an alternative the law forces them to give to people, and it should actually have to be equivalent.

[-] iarigby@lemm.ee 24 points 11 months ago

The wording in the message was also “we won’t use your data for ads” - which I understood as that they will still track it…

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They sure will! They basically just removed untargeted ads and replaced it with addfree subscription. Major loss for users

[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago

Instead of paying 10€/month for a desktop subscribtion you can also just use adblocker which does the exact same thing.

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 9 points 11 months ago

An ad blocker doesn't prevent FB and Instagram internal tracking and usage of personal data, and they don't work on the phone app.

[-] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago

Neither does the subscribtion

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 11 months ago

Fair enough.

[-] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Is it a good news for alternative social media ?

I mean now that people have to pay to use facebook, wouldn't they move to the fedi ?

Also do we want the racist uncle and the boomer memes on the fedi ?

[-] Molotov@feddit.de 11 points 11 months ago

You can still choose to use the "free" version where you have to accept all the cookies, trackers and I don't know what else.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

True, that part never changed. I'm not using any Facebook social networks, so it doesn't affect me. But adding more options doesn't seem like a bad thing to me, even though the price seems pretty steep.

[-] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Shit thing for me, I use it to reach guests and make announcements for the restaurant. Sucks but that's where most people still get local information.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IchLiebeKetchup@feddit.de 3 points 11 months ago

unrelated, but why can't I see a single comment?

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 11 months ago

Did you pay for them? It's 12c per comment, or you can buy the whole thread for 70c

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 11 months ago

I noticed that a lot of comments don't show up if you don't set your language right in your lemmy settings. I just set it to N/A and also shift clicked on English, and it made a lot of invisible comments show up.

[-] IchLiebeKetchup@feddit.de 4 points 11 months ago

that actually did the trick. thank you so much

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
227 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS