276

Friend gave me access to his Adobe account (I'm never giving Adobe money again), and it looks like they don't even support Firefox. That means I'm not using even the one remaining browser-based Adobe service that's left.

Adobe forcing you to use Chrome instead of Firefox to use their service

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 85 points 10 months ago

It's because they're using a chrome only API to interact with USB devices. This used to be a dedicated piece of software. I guess they don't even want to provide an electron app.

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Is this an app for recording and editing podcasts? Why do they need usb access for that? On its website it doesn't says anything about usb.

[-] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Microphones, webcams, capture cards, etc

[-] Still@programming.dev 18 points 10 months ago

those do not require access to the underlying devices to get tho

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 10 months ago

What do they need that for? Every bowser has a file picker/dragndop.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I see it as them interacting directly with microphones, webcams, and other peripherals.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 6 points 10 months ago

Every browser manages that too, though.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 34 points 10 months ago

Have you tried spoofing your User Agent string?

[-] LemmyInRedditSux@lemmy.today 5 points 10 months ago

Can you do a screen recording of the process of what it looks like to spoof a user agent string?

[-] thepreciousboar@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

There are browser estensions that do it, don't remember the name though

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=-aVFxvF3N_E

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Only somewhat related - I "joined" gnu/linux 10 days ago or so, actually moving my main pc to Ubuntu last week (PopOS). Anyway - being as green as I am, I did search for "beginner tips" or "things to do" when installing Ubuntu/Linux.

I was very surprised that publication websites listed "install Chrome"... and it pretty much made me ignore those guides. Linux forums, reddit, etc were fine and what I opted to follow.

[-] 257m@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago

Welcome to the club! Happy to see a new user. Also you can usually just say PopOS and people will understand that it is Ubuntu based.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 14 points 10 months ago

That really shouldn't be a shock

[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago
[-] Piemanding@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

For me it's a shock because I feel it shouldn't be possible. It's not a shock that Adobe would do something like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bourff@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

https://www.photopea.com/ works fine on Firefox, you maybe don't need photoshop.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago

There’s hope. They do say while in beta. Maybe they’re working out issues on one before adapting to the other.

[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Mildly infuriating = I have been parroting Firefox evangelism mindlessly.

This sub was complete shit on reddit too, why did I think it'll be any better here?

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

What does evangelism have to do with blatant monopolistic anti-consumer practices being forced on users?

Why do I have to switch out Firefox, which CAN run anything that chrome can, just because some bullshit company said so.

It's a blatant anti-consumer practice, that is becoming more and more common, just because Firefox can still block ads, while chrome cannot. It's bullshit and more people need to talk about it.

[-] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

Meanwhile, Mozilla refuses to implement feature parity with chromium in certain places they seem to be too invasive.

Also, chromium browsers can block ads.

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Tell me 1 area where firefox isn't at feature parity with chrome, unless you're referring to mozilla choosing to not drop manifest V2 (which is a feature that chrome doesn't have... fully functional adblockers and all) and by chrome, i mean chrome. 90% of people don't use chromium-based browsers, they use chrome, so I think it's more fair to compare firefox to chrome, instead of any of the chromium-based browsers.

[-] egerlach@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

There's the topic of this conversation, WebUSB. I happen to believe that a missing feature here for Firefox is a good thing, mind you...

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I had never even heard of it before and upon looking it up... I struggle to grasp why any web app, website or anything on the internet would ever need access to my USB devices, isn't USB device management the OS's job? Like, call me stupid here, but I see no genuine use case for this.

[-] DeviatedForm@lemmy.cafe 3 points 10 months ago

Some oscilloscopes use the browser, e.g. OpenScopeMZ from digilent. Then there's Via for configuring custom keyboards, other than that nothing comes to my mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Harvey656@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Username checks out. Bad take.

[-] soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

Definitely this. I am kind of tired of people. Mindlessly worshiping Firefox as if Mozilla doesn't have a bad financial track on It's CEOs giving themselves raises and also being relatively heavily funded by Google

I want to enjoy Firefox and use it as my main browser, but it just simply isn't as polished as some of the chromium browsers out there. Which is saying a lot because Firefox used to be the number one browser 20 years ago.

They have absolutely no audience in mind when developing Firefox aside from "everyone", and his other browsers continue implementing of a variety of different functions out of the box, Mozilla either:

A. Implemented as a browser extension that gets abandoned (split screen tabs) B. Never gets implemented at all. So a third party steps in and makes an inferior version (tab groups)

And then in some cases, removing functionality from the browser under some lame excuse like "nobody was using this", when in fact, someone was using that feature.

All of that coupled with a lack of any transparency from the development team with something like a fleshed out road map or anything like that. Instead just a string of promises. Which would be fine and expected out of an open source project, if Mozilla wasn't a multi-million dollar corporation.

Of course, on Lemmy, the open source federated network, everyone here will glorify and put Mozilla on a pedestal as The Lord and Savior of FOSS and the internet as a whole. When there is absolutely nothing that makes them special

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

When there is absolutely nothing that makes them special

Being the only viable non-Chromium browser on the market is pretty special.

It's definitely popular to beat up on popular things online, for some reason. I don't get it, but it is. Keep in mind, though: your problems with Firefox are mild annoyances which are solvable (make an extension, contribute to the project, fork the repo). Chrome's problems (web integrity API, privacy sandbox, manifest v3) are inherently anti-consumer and have the potential to be disastrous for the web as a whole.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Mindlessly worshipping and understanding the advantage of a truly FOSS browser over one owned by the biggest data harvesting organization the world has ever seen are two pretty different things.

Honestly it feels to me like there are some people here paid to be trolls by Google, because their arguments are so incredibly lame that I can't see any other reason they'd exist.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I think many people don't understand what a total chrome (or chromium) monopoly would mean for the internet, it would mean that google will have full control over everything on the internet, they could snap their fingers, implement some bullshit then dare people to do something about it. And I don't get the "firefox isn't polished" argument. What about it is less polished than chrome or anything chromium based?

I do agree that mozilla isn't perfect, but for the better or for worst, it's the last thing preventing a total google monopoly on the internet...

[-] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Honestly, as a Firefox user, I agree. The Firefox evangelism gets too much for me that I'm genuinely concerned it's going cult-like. There's over-enthusiasm (in which I've fell victim to) and then there's hounding people for bothering to choose a Chromium-based browser.

I use Firefox because it works best for most of my web-browsing workflows, but it has its issues - split screen tabs is one, it helps with my workflow for submitting database entries to MusicBrainz or RateYourMusic. Vivaldi has it, Firefox doesn't, so I'll use Vivaldi when I need to, even if I think Firefox has a bit more polish than Vivaldi. That being said, Vivaldi is more willing to add features that power users coming from Firefox or old, Presto-era Opera want.

I do feel like the evangelism is actually toned down in the Firefox-specific Lemmy community, oddly enough (at least on lemmy.ml). In fact, the top post as of this comment is complaining about the privacy issues with Firefox's upcoming Fakespot integration, and the comments are in agreement.

[-] syrooks@infosec.pub 3 points 10 months ago

I found out yesterday that Firefly AI also does not work with Firefox

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
276 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35090 readers
820 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS