544
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago

Everything has to be video huh? Based on the comments here, this could have been a text post with a paragraph of text.

[-] oatscoop@midwest.social 71 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alright, so I watched the video so you guys don't have to. Here's a synopsis:

Youtube's ad blocking is going to backfire because:

  • It caused people to stop using crappy ad blockers that didn't even work with youtube to switch to effective ones that do.
  • Drawing attention to "good" browsers and ad blockers, increasing adoption -- including people that weren't using or aware of the existence of them in the first place
  • Increased support of the people making/maintaining ad blockers. Spite driven increase in donations, subscriptions to paid ad blockers, bug reports, etc.
  • Cites the Streisand effect.
  • Analogy of how prohibition led to stronger drugs, stronger booze, etc. If you tell people they can't do something, they're more likely to do it and get better at doing it.
  • Cites how Youtube's attempts to block ad blockers is breaking older embedded apps in smart TVs, chromecast, etc. Older or non-tech people are just more likely to stop using those rather than try to fix them -- and thus cut back on watching youtube.
  • Believes Youtube's actions are an indication the internet's "free with ads" model is dying -- they're getting desperate to maintain profitability.
[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s funny to me because I recently downloaded an app for my nvidia shield called smartTube which blocks ads and all that jazz. And I donated $10 to the dev. And posted to the git.

I only did this because of the recent headlines about YouTube policies changing. I don’t mind paying for things. But I will pay someone else out of spite if you charge me too much, pester me, or take away things like that were free.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Sums up a lot of mental outlaw vids

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

But he’s so edgy!

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

You just described 99.7% of videos on the web.

Pretty much anyone can read about 4x faster than they can speak, and that's before all the fluff that shitty presenters add.

[-] Camilo@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a website I discovered recently for doing text summaries of YouTube videos.

https://www.summarize.tech

This video was also posted on YouTube, so here you can see a summary:

https://www.summarize.tech/www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tBBQGkmn_0

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lea@feddit.de 67 points 1 year ago

Jesus what the hell is going on in those comments over there.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

triple parentheses

unironic use of the word cuck

conspiracy theory about Google being a fake company

Welp.

[-] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 6 points 1 year ago

His comment section is pretty fucking wild.

I really hope Louis Rossmans's fan base is less toxic. The fact that he has been on Tim Pool probably imported a lot of weirdos.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] hakstc@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

I went to odysee once and saw the Babylon Bee advertised front page. Told me all I needed to know about the platform.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What's wrong with the Babylon Bee? Isn't that a site similar to The Onion?

Edit: lol downvoted for asking a genuine question?

[-] wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one 26 points 1 year ago

The bee claims to be satire to deflect criticism. Often it fails to satirize at all, and just says shit things with intent to claim "its a joke bro"

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 20 points 1 year ago

Much of The Babylon Bee's content, while stated to be satirical, often misses the point of satire.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Devouring@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You went against the cult. How dare you!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ExcursionInversion@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

So many alternatives get flooded with these crazy people

[-] interloper@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

What the hell indeed.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

It's funny cuz I had an ad blocker that worked on Youtube for a while but then stopped working one day. That was 3 years ago and I was too lazy to find a better blocker. Since they started putting that pop up in EVERY video, that prompted me to finally install a working one. Good job, Youtube. Ya played yaself.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I could deal with the 2 ads at the beginning of the video and the end but when they added ad interruptions in the middle of 5 minute videos and had ads covering the comments on every video. Yeah, screw off YouTube.

I just sideloaded uYou and it doesn’t even know what ads are so it never loads them. I would never had bothered circumventing the ads if they were reasonable, but they aren’t. They want everyone on premium and obviously have disdain for non-premium users. Have no zero respect for that kind of business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago
[-] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 117 points 1 year ago

His argument is:

  1. A lot of people were using poor adblockers.
  2. Youtube can block the bad ones but struggles with the good ones.
  3. People switch to the better adblockers (some of which require a subscription)
[-] Imalostmerchant@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

Which is why you always finish your antibiotics

[-] PeWu@lemmy.ml 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm hearing first time that some of the adblockers require subscription... Like, there's ublock origin, the one and only god out there, why would you like to go somewhere else, even closed source?

Edit: damn autocorrect

[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

I wonder how true that is for the average user

My father disabled ublock because it didn't let him use YouTube. I sent hima tutorial on how to update the list and purge the cache but it was too much work for him

[-] baru@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Use Ublock Origin, not Ublock.

[-] criticon@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I meant ublock origin

Didn't know there was a "vanilla" ublock

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Consider using VNC and simply doing the work for him. I find I just do not have the time to coach them through a document and I just do all this stuff for my parents instead. Life's too short to explain where the any key is.

[-] Mrduckrocks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Never updated or purged ublock origin. Never got the popup. Is this only regional thing or Firefox built different.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] The_Vampire@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago
  1. The video's comment section on its native site is... interesting.
  2. I don't trust this guy. It feels like he's just slinging things at the wall that most people could intuit without any research. Yes, sometimes things backfire when you try to stifle them. Sometimes, however, the stifling works (otherwise dictators would have a much harder time ruling). That's just the way things go.
  3. I'ma need some actual data to back up Youtube's anti-adblocker experiment succeeding/failing. People are so quick to jump on the 'it failed' or 'it succeeded' bandwagon but the truth is we simply don't know the result yet, and may not for a long while.
  4. This could've been an email. This guy's delivery is sprawling and lacks conciseness.
[-] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 8 points 1 year ago

He'll often take a two minute point and then extend it by 10 minutes.

He's also one of those people who acts like everyone who doesn't use Linux is a sheep. Linux is fundamentally not ready for widespread desktop use. The only way I see that changing is if a corporation decides to make their own distro and find a way to monetize it. It would also need to be pre-installed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A10@kerala.party 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is one mistake in this Video. Ublock origin doesn't accept donations the last time checked.

[-] ours@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

You're right: uBo doesn't accept donations out of integrity but they propose people donate to the list maintainers on which it depends instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nfsu2@feddit.cl 17 points 1 year ago

"oh no, anyway" moment...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
544 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59138 readers
1937 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS