315

At a casino bingo hall in southwestern Colorado, Lauren Boebert, a Republican congresswoman, bounced her 6-month-old grandson on her knee.

“The election’s still a ways away,” she said as the guests arriving for the Montezuma County Republican Party’s annual Lincoln Day dinner trickled into the room. “And in talking with people at events like this, you know, it seems like there’s a lot of mercy and a lot of grace.”

The month before, Boebert, then in the midst of finalizing a divorce, was caught on a security camera vaping and groping her date shortly before being ejected from a performance of the musical “Beetlejuice” at the Buell Theater in Denver for causing a disturbance. The footage contradicted her own initial claims about the incident, and the venue’s statement that Boebert had demanded preferential treatment added to the outrage.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 126 points 2 years ago

At a casino bingo hall in southwestern Colorado, Lauren Boebert, a Republican congresswoman, bounced her 6-month-old grandson on her knee.

Reminder: This woman is 36 years old.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 113 points 2 years ago

Now now, let's not shame young mothers. Let's shame her hypocrisy.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago

Doesn't that hypocrisy include abstinence until marriage? Because that's sure not what happened with her son.

[-] littlewonder@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Don't forget being a part of the party that works to remove social nets and support systems for young parents.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 17 points 2 years ago

In general, I don't think it's rational to judge people for the choices their offspring make.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

I think it's very rational to judge people's parenting ability.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 years ago

Do I judge her because she's a 36 year old grandmother, generally no. Do I judge her because of her consistent stream of poor choices and hypocritical bullshit that has led her to becoming a 36 year old grandmother? Absolutely.

Look shit happens, you're not necessarily a bad person if your kid makes a poor choice and now has their own kid. You are a bad person if you can do all of those things and then try to pretend like you are some pious Christian that gets to lord over everyone else. She can get fucked. I hope she gets demolished in the election and fades into obscurity.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

That's a red herring. She's not an awful person for being a grandmother at 36. She's an awful person for being a hypocrite.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

To simplify even further, she’s just an awful person.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

She's just awful.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

that's sure not what happened with her son

Or her in a crowded theater full of children.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago

I'm not going to shame her for being a grandmother at her age. I will absolutely blame her for using her 6-month-old grandkid as a political prop.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 79 points 2 years ago

The classic platform of begging for mercy whilst giving none.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago

Mercy my ass, she does nothing but lie and makeup crazy s*** 24x7 to further her agenda. She needs to be removed from society for our own safety.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah. She could give hand jobs all day and I couldn't care less, but I can't forgive her for constantly lying out of her ass, before, during, after this event. She learns nothing from it.

I wanted to refer to Boebert as "first date handjob in a movie theater" lady but that discounts all her incredibly racist, offensive, terrible shit she said and did for the past five years.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

How am I to interpret this sound bite that includes bouncing a six month old baby on your knee offered in a... checks notes... casino bingo hall?

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Let's stop with the overused "checks notes" redditism.

[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

That's what you took from that. Neat.

Incidentally, it's the first time I've ever used it. See my username, put it into present tense, and carry on with your miserable day.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I like it. It adds character when appropriate. It's fine if you don't, you're entitled to your opinion. Just don't ruin it for everyone else.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You just said it. When appropriate. It's kind of annoying when people use it in an * checks notes * unimaginative way.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

^ See, now that's the spirit! 😘

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago
[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 years ago

Can we not dunk on people having fun?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jasondj@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 years ago

What’s a redditism? Is that like some sort of augmented reality porn bot?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Scrolling through the article - then suddenly a proud eagle holding a table top with his mighty penis…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago

Hahahaha No

[-] Qkall@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

and i kinda want to see her do porn, but life's not always fair... well i mean this case she's gotten away with far more than most folks would... so yeah maybe its not fair in that regard either.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago

Honestly, since conservatives are probably the biggest consumers of porn, she could start a new Conservative politician-themed genre, and "ride" (pun intended) her celebrity and be groped by all the people she wants all the way to the bank.

[-] kubica@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

Wait, wasn't it that any kind of sexual act that doesn't have the purpose of procreation is a sin?

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago

Only if you get caught, are having fun, or are queer, of course (/s). But the two core rules of Conservatism are:

  • I get to do what I want.
  • You have to do what I say.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

I do find it hilarious that of all the reprehensible things this woman has said and done over the past few years, she's probably gonna be taken down because she copped a quick feel.

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 6 points 2 years ago

If she hadn't nearly lost in the last election, the sudden concern for her character wouldn't be here now, even as a party disruptor.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 years ago

so many echos of that terrible human being from alaska with an uncanny resemblance to tina fey

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

If it were a male politician he'd be relentlessly hounded out of politics by his peers with no mercy even considered. Boebert is unfit to represent anybody.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Um, so there’s this guy named Donald Trump who still got elected president even after a tape of him bragging about grabbing women by their, um, yeah, was made public.

I don’t expect people would hold men to a similar standard here either tbh

[-] Thaumiel@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I mean, not if he was Republican. Remember, Matt Gaetz literally trafficked teenage girls and he's still in power.

[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

I forgot this was US politics for a minute.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mechoman444@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I just want bobo out of politics!

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

The handjob is an excuse, not a reason. The reason is that she came a hair's breadth from losing a seat the GOP is counting on and her numbers have gotten worse since then.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Optimus Prime thought she was made of sterner stuff.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The month before, Ms. Boebert, then in the midst of finalizing a divorce, was caught on a security camera vaping and groping her date shortly before being ejected from a performance of the musical “Beetlejuice” at the Buell Theater in Denver for causing a disturbance.

Pete Coors, the brewery scion, former Senate candidate and 2016 Trump fund-raiser, announced his endorsement in a statement provided to the Times, describing Mr. Hurd as “a principled leader of character whose conduct and behavior will never make us regret our support.”

Then a 33-year-old owner of a gun-themed, pandemic-lockdown-defying bar and restaurant in the small town of Rifle, she was an immediate sensation in the right wing of the party, which had transparently longed for its own answer to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the social media-savvy young left-wing Democratic congresswoman from New York.

The son of a local medical clinic director, he attended the University of Notre Dame and was planning on becoming a Catholic priest when he met his wife, Barbora, at an American Enterprise Institute seminar in Bratislava.

Mr. Hurd appears only peripherally in his first campaign ad, in which Barbora describes her journey to American citizenship after a childhood in Communist Czechoslovakia and warns that “we can’t take this freedom for granted” — a Reagan-revivalist pitch that also nods toward his concern about the risk of authoritarianism within his own party.

For some Colorado Republicans, the primary contest for her seat has become a proxy battle in the ongoing conflict within the party between an old guard of politicians and donors and the right-wing grass-roots activists that have come to dominate its state and county organizations — a fight in which 2020 election denial is a major dividing line.


The original article contains 1,556 words, the summary contains 286 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Golfnbrew@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

This would get an F from a good English teacher.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
315 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24562 readers
2698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS