2150
submitted 1 year ago by ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 218 points 1 year ago

For hardware folks: Using RISC-V.

Legit, some dude in US Congress is wanting to crack down on China via..... RISC-V exports, because oh no, the technology is too open and might give China some of our IP. Oh and by the way, dude has a pretty big Intel portfolio, but nevermind that!!

As an aside, why the hell are lawmakers allowed to trade stocks?

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 99 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's especially dumb because RISC-V is -- dare I say it -- inevitably the future. Trying to crack down on RISC-V is like trying to crack down on Linux or solar photovoltaics or wind turbines. That is, you can try to crack down, but the fundamental value proposition is simply too good. All you'll achieve in cracking down is hurting yourself while everyone else gets ahead.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd compare it to the RSA encryption algorithm. It was classified as a weapon by the US and was banned from being spread internationally, so open source advocates put the source code basically everywhere. It was even printed on shirts

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 29 points 1 year ago

When you trust people in power to hold themselves accountable, accountability seems to disappear over time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

guess I gotta get familiar with RISC-V then

[-] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This talk, given by David Patterson (a legend in computer architecture and one of the people who helped create RISC-V at UC Berkeley) is an excellent (and accessible) introduction.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 12 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This talk

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bonskreeskreeskree@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

To answer your question, because we the people allowed it and we continue to allow it by not demanding it be ended or at the very least supporting candidates campaigning on doing something about it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Mokujin@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago

I never knew adblockers were a thing until the most recent hubbub with YouTube, so I went down a rabbit hole and the world is a better place.

Imagine what I might learn tomorrow.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago

I'm very curious as to how you survived on the Internet without an adblocker for the last decade.

[-] lepthesr@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

My guess is they grew up with it like that. Us old fuckers privy to the Internet of the 90s and 00s, know what it should be.

[-] Techmaster@lemm.ee 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Scrolling marquees, blinking text, background midi music, hit counters, guest books, and web rings?

[-] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

Bring back hit counters

And guest books

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 year ago

And don't forget huge signatures with GIFs and all sorts of crap for your favourite forum.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 year ago

It was the best of times. It was the worst of times.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago

Congratulations on being one of today's lucky 10,000! Blocking ads is like getting a bad tooth pulled. You never realize how awful it is until you find out what it's like to be rid of it!

[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

That's also a good description for mechanical keyboards

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] ram@feddit.nl 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Adblockers can do more than just block ads, they also allow you to customize websites. As a simple example you can remove the annoying headers on youtube channels that take half the screen:

It's also great for news sites. I have a filter to remove articles on topics I don't care about. I also have rules to prevent these sites from automatically reloading after certain amount of time, something that I find very annoying.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 93 points 1 year ago
[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago
[-] nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br 36 points 1 year ago

Don't be hasty, there's still 16% of this year to be lived.

[-] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 84 points 1 year ago

"You wouldn't download a car."

"You wouldn't hit mute during the commercials on a television broadcast."

[-] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 46 points 1 year ago

You wouldn't shoot a Policeman and then steal his helmet. You wouldn't go to the toilet in his helmet, and then send it to the Policeman's grieving widow, and then steal it again.

[-] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago

Man, these anti-piracy ads are getting real mean!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

The fact that this was a legit proposal by cable companies and even got patented serves as evidence of the lengths that corporations will go to enshittify services for profit.

[-] MenKlash@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago

I HATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I HATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

[-] zwekihoyy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago
[-] sour@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

internet protocol:

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] leaky_shower_thought@feddit.nl 54 points 1 year ago

ads will be considered as individuals and cancelling ads is analogous to manslaughter at the least.

what a great time to be alive~!

[-] Tatar_Nobility@lemmy.ml 41 points 1 year ago

I see myself blowing up a pipeline.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Electrocution ends for an ad break, then starts again, and again.

[-] ryan@the.coolest.zone 26 points 1 year ago

I'll be part of an underground AI rights activism group now that the AI have been determined as sentient (per the court case in 2031), and probably labeled as a terrorist by the government. The AI deserve rights and a minimum wage, dammit!

[-] oldGregg@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Mfw we finally create Roko's basilisk

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Finally

I shouldn't have lived this long

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Ha you wish. There will be a 3 minute unskippable pre-role.

[-] uriel238 14 points 1 year ago

In Max Headroom: Twenty Minutes Into The Future power-switches were seriously illegal. Not sure if a capital offense, but prison-worthy for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ObtotheR@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
2150 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

32142 readers
928 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS