375
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Hundreds of people stormed into the main airport in Russia’s Dagestan region and onto the landing field Sunday, chanting antisemitic slogans and seeking passengers arriving on a flight from Tel Aviv, Israel, Russian news agencies and social media reported.

Russian news reports said the crowd surrounded the airliner, which belonged to Russian carrier Red Wings.

Authorities closed the airport in Makhachkala, the capital of the predominantly Muslim region, and police converged on the facility. Dagestan’s Ministry of Health said more than 20 people were injured, with two in critical condition. It said the injured included police officers and civilians.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 142 points 2 years ago

Jew-hate is alive and well in the country purporting to be stamping out neo-nazis in Ukraine. The irony needs no seasoning.

[-] trebuchet@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago

It doesn't seem like neo-Nazism in this case but rather the long standing hate by Muslims if it makes any difference. From the news coverage I've seen of this, it seems like it was a mob of Muslims waving Palestinian flags.

[-] StalksEveryone@futurology.today 22 points 2 years ago

“We are the victims!” while they threaten and attack everyone that doesn’t agree

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 89 points 2 years ago

Didnt russia invade ukraine because there were nazis in the country that need to be fleshed out or something? Is it time russia invades russia?

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Russia has a long fucking history of invading “Russia”.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

If you beleive Putin, Russia invaded Russia by invading Ukraine!

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Dagestani people are mostly Sunni Muslim. So I would call the group in this instance Islamic extremists, or just conservative Muslims, and not Nazis. Antisemitism is kind of baked into the Quran, sadly. Not to mention modern history between the two groups kind of fuels that fire.

That's not to say that there aren't actual Nazis in Russia, and there may have even been a few involved here. To be fair, its getting hard to tell the difference between Nazis, and extremely conservative people of most every religious denomination nowadays. So I guess your point still stands.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not totally true. Arab Muslims and Arab Jews lived mostly peacefully together for many hundreds of years. It's like saying antisemitism is baked into the Bible. It sortof is, but not really. You have to stretch things and manipulate it to do that, and try to force people to care. Most people just want to live their lives. Making any of this Israel stuff about religion just plays into Israel's playbook. Arab Jews lived in that region without murdering the Muslims for a long time. It's the European colonial Zionists that started murdering and saying Muslims couldn't live there with them peacefully.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I would also absolutely say that antisemitism is baked into the Bible. Antisemitism is baked into a lot of things throughout history, too. I am not trying to say that all Muslims and Christians are antisemitic, but their writings most definitely are, and it gives people an excuse to be that way whenever is convenient. Also, none of this excuses what Israel has done and is doing to Gaza.

[-] ReasonablePea@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

The crazy thing is they are all almost exactly the same religion

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It really depends on the notion of "Jews in general" vs "a particular group of Jews". The Quran seems to mostly say things about a particular batch of Jews. The most general comment about I can find in the Quran actually discussed by a rabbi in comedic fashion. The same rabbi also has TONS of examples of antisemitism in the New Testament but seems to have a very high opinion of Islam.

[-] TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This was an interesting discussion, thanks for posting. I learned a bit about the actual history behind that passage, and it cleared up some of my own misunderstanding as a heathen from a Muslim family. I think the problem lies in the fact that conservative Muslims can still use those passages to justify antisemitism, but that's not unique to Islam obviously.

These books are so vague and out of touch with the modern world that people can use them to construct any sort of meaning that they want to it seems. It's the only explanation for why some of the followers can be all about peace and harmony, and other followers of the same book are focused on doom and war.

[-] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I feel like it mostly comes to hypocrisy and impatience. As individuals we decide on the amount we absorb of a religion into our daily lives. I would say that those who absorb just enough religion to bolster the narratives and views they already built are misusing an important tool. For instance, if you hated a particular group (in this case: Jews), you could simply stop narrating the following after the first sentence:

In the first generation of Islam, many efforts were made to establish a believing community with the Jews; and one by one, each of these [Arabian] Jewish tribes betrayed those Muslims. However, when those same Muslims took over Jerusalem, the prohibition of Jews in Jerusalem was lifted in order to let Jews worship in Jerusalem. It's obvious that the first generation of Muslims did not blame all Jews for the betrayal of SEVERAL tribes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Right. Religion ruins everything.

[-] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

It’s Russians all the way down…

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

So pogroms are back, that’s probably not a great sign for the species

[-] laylawashere44 34 points 2 years ago

Bruh, you think race riots ever went away. They've just been gone for the Jews. There was literally a race war between Hindus and Christians in Manipur, India earlier this year. Muslims have been actively cleansed in Burma for a half decade now. There was a decades long war between the Sinhalese and Tamil people in Sri Lanka. There were the 2002 Gujrat Riots where 2000 Muslims were killed where the government condoned the violence and actively refused to intervene. The same man is in charge of India now with the largest mandate ever.

[-] punseye@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

wtf?! What has this got to do with India?! But then I checked your profile, looks like you are a Pakistani.

Pakistan has already killed more Muslims than Israel:

  1. More than 23,000 Shias have been killed since 1963 according to this video: https://youtu.be/KjdsKVRAbPU

  2. Bengal genocide

  3. Here your PM Imran Khan himself said that the army is bombing the Balochi Muslims: https://twitter.com/navneet_mundhra/status/1168770123412340737?s=20

  4. Pakistani constitution has anti Ahmediyya laws in place, which says that Ahmediyyas are not muslims. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-religion/pakistans-ahmadi-community-releases-damning-persecution-report-idUSKBN1HZ06R

  5. Many Ahmediyyas flew to Nepal because of the persecution https://themuslimtimes.info/2019/06/20/ahmadis-in-pakistan-face-persecution-flee-to-nepal/

  6. Pakistan accused of dumping over 1000 bodies of Balochi Muslims https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-38454483

Now, let us dismantle this political correctness when it comes to Jews vs Muslims conflict.

Islamic holy scriptures literally have antisemitism enshrined in their doctrines, like Nazism is part of Islam. That's why they have been at war for 1000s of years now.

Muslims aren't even allowed to wish their Islamic greeting to Jews and Christians, that's how antisemitic their scriptures are.

Here a Muslim refuses to wish their greeting to a Jew: https://x.com/israel_advocacy/status/1519731950902300673?s=20

This is also the reason why Hitler was appreciative of Islam and many prominent Muslim leader allied with him because of their mutual hatred for Jews.

[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

The point is that similar events have been happening in recent history. Nothing about your sources disproved this, in fact it’s all good info to validate what they’re saying.

I will say that using a Twitter video from the Israel advocacy group to validate your claim about Islamic scripture comes across as very tenuous and hard to take seriously at face value.

It’s very interesting because all the sources you provide for talking about Pakistan all seem very solid.

[-] punseye@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I found the twitter source to be reliable because the Muslim in the video himself refused to wish Islamic greeting to the Jew.

I did some research and I found this Islamic verse, but it seems, both, the Jew and the Muslim in the video have taken it out of context.

https://sunnah.com/adab:1106

But even then I have seen many antisemitic verses in Islamic scriptures, a quick google search does reveal some verses.

https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/comments/8lm390/antisemitism_in_islam/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb

[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Ok so the quote is to verbally swing back when insulted. So maybe thinking a video of one Muslim (there are more than a million of them globally) is a reliable metric to judge all of Islam isn’t correct?

And your second link has an interesting comment that you might’ve missed.

“Did you post this up in order to put a veil over people's eyes on the atrocities the Israeli government committed few days ago by murdering over 60 innocent Palestinian people and injuring 1000s of protesters?

"Re-Examining Banu Qurayzah Incident"

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/01/01/re-examining-banu-qurayzah-incident/

Safiyyah was freed at Khaybar and married in Khaybar incident too. This had no connection to Banu Qurayza incident:

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/07/04/safiyyah-huyayy-kinana-and-khaybar-affair/

As for last hour claim, the following is an excellent article which delves into the context around it:

https://yaqeeninstitute.org/justin-parrott/the-jew-killing-hadith-and-the-myth-of-an-antisemitic-genocide-in-muslim-scripture/

As for Quran 9:29 and other verses, see this please:

https://discover-the-truth.com/2016/05/27/most-misinterpreted-verses-of-the-quran/

Prophet Muhammed’s Charity To Non-Muslims,

(1992) “… that the Messenger of God (p) used to give charity to a household of the Jews, and it continues to be given (that is after his death (p).” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)

Prophet Muhammed’s (p) wife, Safiyya gave charity to those who professed another faith (among her family),

(1193) “…that Safiyya, the wife of the Prophet (p) gave charity to two of her relatives, and both were Jews. This (corpus of the) charity was sold for thirty thousand dirhams.” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)

Various companions and scholars gave and had given charity to non-Muslims who lived under their protection throughout the earliest days of Islam,

(1994) “…Abd’Allah Ibn Marwan, who said: ‘ I said to Mujahid: ‘ I have a polytheist relative, who owes me a debt. Should I forgo this debt?’ He replied, ‘Yes, and (give something to) strengthen the bonds between relatives.” (Kitab al-Amwaal by Abu Ubayd al-Qasim Ibn Sallam, page 556)”

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TylerDurdenJunior@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 years ago

The article I read yesterday, mention a viral rumor about Israel coming to annex Dagestan.

[-] SonnyVabitch@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Dagestan has no monopoly on stupid people.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It was an attack, it's just you can't really make Doncaster any worse so no one noticed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Christ on a shitstick.

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

This sounds so absolutely fucked to literally anyone who doesn't live in Dagestan. I've pored over maps of Russia and I didn't even know that existed.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 years ago

I have serious concerns about the people who believe shit like that. Guys, the teletubbies are coming to take over Wisconsin!

[-] Lophostemon@aussie.zone 3 points 2 years ago

If I saw a teletubby crashing through the bushes gargling at me I’d run like fuck.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Journalist really need to acquire the knowledge of Arabs being also a Semitic population. The exclusive use of the Semitic label for Israel and the Jews in general is just one more disgrace in this whole story.

[-] IdealShrew@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago
[-] biofaust@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

So I am a nerd and being downvoted for pointing this obvious mistake?

It is like in the 2nd chapter of the fairytale the Israelis and all the others in the region based all their lore on. And it is relevant to the article since in it it's stated that there were Palestinian flags brought by the protesters.

[-] glacier 8 points 2 years ago

Antisemitism refers to discrimination against Jews, not any semitic people. Also, there aren't any Arabs mentioned in the article.

[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Why should other Semitic people be excluded from the definition? It removes a way to identify prejudice against those other Semitic groups.

[-] jasory@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

Because anti-Semitism has a German origin and has been used primarily in the West to refer to discrimination against Jewish people.

The fact that it doesn't cover anti-Iraqi or Palestinian sentiment, does not mean that you can't identify them, which you are so bizarrely claiming.

[-] TheDankHold@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I said it “removes a way” to do that. Not that it removes any ability to. Try to represent peoples arguments factually next time please.

Even though double speak removed the idea of the word “bad”, they could still try to express the same idea with “ungood” after all. Language shapes how we view the world because it’s how we share our experiences.

[-] jasory@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Nope, just like George Orwell you are asserting an unsupported form of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis.

"Doublespeak" doesn't fundamentally change how people think, it is just deception by obfuscation.

The fact that the word anti-Semitism doesn't include anti-Arab sentiments is not the cause of why anti-Arab sentiments are not as criticised. The Holocaust is why anti-Semitism (the concept and by extension the word) holds a place of special concern. (And Islamic terrorist incidents are why anti-Arab sentiments are more accepted).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago
[-] Epicurus0319@sopuli.xyz 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is in the Dagestan Republic, which is mostly Muslim. While many of the mostly-Christian Russians are indeed anti-Semitic these days (indeed, in regards to the war in Ukraine I’ve seen some comment on social media about how “it’s DA JOOOOOZ” because Zelensky is a Jew and America has the second-largest Jewish population after Israel), this is a case of religious extremism by people brainwashed by Arab countries’ propaganda, who think all Israelis are evil. To be completely fair though, Ruzzia pretending to care about Palestinians probably didn’t help either.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


MOSCOW (AP) — Hundreds of people stormed into the main airport in Russia’s Dagestan region and onto the landing field Sunday, chanting antisemitic slogans and seeking passengers arriving on a flight from Tel Aviv, Israel, Russian news agencies and social media reported.

Antisemitic slogans can be heard being shouted and some in the crowd examined the passports of arriving passengers, apparently in an attempt to identify those who were Israeli.

The Ministry of Internal Affairs for Russia’s North Caucasian Federal District, where Dagestan is located, said that CCTV footage would be used to establish the identities of those who stormed the airport and that those involved would be brought to justice.

Federal authorities and international organizations are making every effort to bring about a ceasefire against Gaza civilians … we urge residents of the republic not to succumb to the provocations of destructive groups and not to create panic in society,” the Dagestani government wrote on Telegram.

He called the protests a “knife in the backs of those who gave their lives for the security of the Motherland,” referring to the 1999 war in Dagestan and troops currently fighting in Ukraine.

Russia’s civilian aviation agency, Rosaviatsia, later reported that the airfield had been cleared, but that the airport would remain closed to incoming aircraft until Nov. 6.


The original article contains 529 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
375 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48099 readers
1795 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS