1370
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 107 points 1 year ago

I'd love to see a video that takes this concept, but walks around with it. Literally

Start by getting out of a car on the side of the street or in a parking lot, and when the camera gets out of the car, all the "car areas" drop away, leaving only the paths you're "allowed" to take. Tiny sections right against the parking spaces, zebra crossings, sidewalks, all normal (or in this style).

Camera goes about a normal day, and as they're looking around, all the car designated areas are just voids.

Bonus points if areas you're technically not supposed to walk are boxed off in like a video game style DO NOT ENTER wall. For instance, there are sections of my city with NO sidewalks, up against private residences. So your options are walk over people's yards or in the street. In this scenario, it's a void against a wall. Good luck.

I'm just thinking about walking to get to downtown, and there's no way I could do it without being somewhere I'm "not allowed". And imagining the massive voids everywhere is a bit depressing. Not that roads and parking lot deserts are any less depressing... I need to go walk in the woods for a bit...

[-] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 46 points 1 year ago

I'm just thinking about walking to get to downtown, and there's no way I could do it without being somewhere I'm "not allowed".

If I want to cross the 4-lane road just outside my apartment, there is simply no legal way to do it. There is an intersection but no crosswalks and no way to request to cross. I shouldn't have to have a vehicle just to get from one side of the road to the other.

[-] Neato@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

In most states you can cross at any intersection without crosswalks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homoludens@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And sudden cracks and voids appear, when cars park on sidewalks or a car crashes into pedestrian areas.

[-] the_real_monte@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

Sounds like something that Corridor Crew/Wren would make

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

This has circled around the internet for years now. I remember the last time I saw it people were losing their minds over how “reductive” it was. Blew me away

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] lowleveldata@programming.dev 46 points 1 year ago

Does that mean I gain the flying ability when I jaywalk

[-] mypasswordis1234@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Yes, try your ability over a cliff to ensure

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nieceandtows@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago

Okay, so if there are no more cars and only public transports, people can walk all over the road without worry? Where do you think buses drive?

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

It's a fucking metaphor. JFC...

[-] kimpilled@infosec.pub 28 points 1 year ago

Most transit advocates prefer trams/streetcars over buses. They’re safer and can coexist with people much better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] barfdrinker 24 points 1 year ago

It’s one bus every so often vs a non stop stream of cars. That’s the difference.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] quatschkopf34@feddit.de 24 points 1 year ago

Public transport needs much less space than cars. Especially if you put all the parking lots into the equation. So much space in cities is wasted by cars that do not even move most of the day.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago

my dude you do realize that's exactly what people did in the past before cars existed, right? There's a video of olden gothenburg that shows kids running in front of the trams for fun!

And if you go there now you'll see people crossing precisely wherever the fuck they please, because it's just inherently way easier to deal with a couple public transport vehicles per minute than it is 50 cars.

[-] adj16@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The point is that the whole thing should be designed differently. We should focus these spaces around people rather than cars. There probably wouldn’t even be roads there at all. Streets would be fewer and with more space between them, and they would be designed to defer to pedestrian traffic more often, rather than the other way around. Bus stops would be on those streets, and pedestrians would walk a distance away to board them, while moving through safe, walking-focused sidewalks and avenues on the way.

[-] mhz@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

This surely translate to less traffic, better commute times, less noises, less pollution, safer streets and the list goes on.

[-] yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's almost like everyone would have more space if cars wouldn't eat up 50% of the available space, while public transport and bikes only get 4% and 2%... :O Ö O: .O.

And this is in an area of Berlin where only 13% of trips are taken by car while bikes and public transport account for 32% and 22%.

[-] zik@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Buses are better than cars but they're still the worst form of public transport. They pollute like cars. They're dangerous like cars. And they move as slowly as the traffic, like cars.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] quackers 18 points 1 year ago

Man this sub is weird. i would block it but im kinda curious to see if it devolves into some kind of weird flat yearthy / vegany hybrid sub. god speed to you all, cuz you dont have cars i guess.

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Plenty of regulars of this sub do have cars and no issue with using them, but instead just want cities to favor other methods of transportation. This would be a good example. Not sure what relation do you think any of this has to flat earthers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bioemerl@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Cars also have people in them, which images like this conveniently forget.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

🚘🧠 spotted

[-] Lux 26 points 1 year ago

People also have cars in them, which comments like this conveniently forget.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

have you seen that ad showing people simulating traffic but without the cars? it's just even more poignant as it shows how absurdly inefficient cars are at transporting people (on average a car contains 1.2 people).

[-] JoShmoe@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

Not to mention the growing sinkholes everywhere.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's missing parking lots :(

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
1370 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9864 readers
620 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS