188
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NoDignity@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

I always see comments under posts like these with people proclaiming that ASML/europe should just ignore these demands or asking why the US could even make these in the first place but most people just hear about the companies/machines and don't really understand the situation.

First ASML did not really become the sole provider of high end lithography because they were the absolute best or anything its just that they were the last one standing after decades of mergers and acquisitions consolidated the industry to just a single company. So even though they are incorporated in the netherlands and build the machines and do a lot of their work there they rely on lots of engineering work from around the world and very heavily from inside the US from companies that were merged into them.

More important than that though ASML is mostly an engineering/manufacturing company but before it gets to the point of designing and building these machines it requires years to decades of scientific research and the vast majority of that research is done in the US. In some cases it is US corporations like IBM and universities who do a lot of this but also the US government funds/performs a lot of this as well. So many of the early EUV patents are actually owned by the US government and licensed to ASML so going against the wishes of the US govt could risk being cut off from those patents. Even if you think they should just ignore the patents and build them anyway that would still cut them off from future research.

From the perspective of ASML even if they don't like this they really don't have a lot of choice but to do it and it probably does not have a huge short term effect on them financially anyway since they are already booked up for years in advance so they really only miss out on things like service contracts.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 11 points 3 days ago

Great context. Though you should probably change all that talk of the US funding research to the past tense, or the in-freefall-collapse-as-budgets-are-slashed-and-political-goons-replace-science-advisors tense, which is rarely used but the current situation fits.

[-] NoDignity@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah unfortunately a lot of this research was performed or funded by the dept of energy which currently doesn't exist anymore. Luckily though since these types of patents generate a good amount of money I haven't really seen as much a of significant scale back in it from universities like some other fields, at least from people I know who do this sort of work. They are mostly keeping all the people doing it on and just scaling back on new equipment and buildings and things like that. Talking with people they are mostly just biding their time until the next election as most of this was done as executive orders so it can be undone the same way even if it takes years to rebuild. It does just suck that one of the two major political parties decided to make anti-intelligence and anti-science their main personality though it remains to be seen whether it stays that way once their dear leader is gone from power and given his health hopefully gone from the living world.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 4 points 3 days ago

Yes, biding time and running a pincher strategy of sending out some people to kiss the ring and sending significantly more to the watch groups, industry partners, and courts. Though we've also lost as many people to foreign institutions in the last two years as in the previous twenty.

The GOP courted the anti-intellectual vote because their ideology no longer had popular support. It was a deal with the devil and now the devil has come to collect. It's unlikely they can wind back that deal. The only hope is that more voters wake up and start to understand the impacts of putting morons in charge.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 84 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe EU should ban ASML from selling to USA?
And make a law specifically to allow ASML to sell to China.
Unfortunately many politicians in Europe are doing as USA ask. But the reality is that USA depend more on EU than the other way around. So we should not let USA decide anything, at a minimum they should consult EU first! Brats.
Half the US soft power comes from EU and allies supporting USA. Without us, USA would never have become the global leader they have been for 7 decades.
We allowed that because USA helped us in WW2, and it worked pretty well for half a century.
But unfortunately USA has torn up all agreements and are walking away from their responsibilities, and work against their allies.
We don't owe USA anything anymore, maybe Americans should wake up and realize that.

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago

The article says ASML is dependent on US suppliers. Cutting off sales to the US would probably backfire.

ASML is also dependent on American suppliers for its own production. In the past, American threats to disrupt the company’s supply chain have successfully convinced the Dutch government to further restrict ASML’s exports.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

I bet we can get those parts from China if we make an agreement with them.

[-] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I think it’s time for nations to take a hard look at their pipelines and realize how little places like the Netherlands have moved from their dark root in the slave trade. If it needs fascist governments, totalitarian states, or exploitative labor to produce, maybe don’t fucking make that thing.

Or just ignore history. Ya, that’s what they’ll do. Keep your Black Pete and ill-gotten wares. Jesus, do better.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I'm looking at my pipelines, what is it that I'm supposed to look for?
I have no idea what you mean by any of that? Who is black Pete? Is that a slavery reference? And who are you accusing? And what are you accusing them of.

[-] xJREB@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I think they are referring to the controversial Dutch tradition of Zwarte Piet (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zwarte_Piet).

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Oh wow, there was racism in Netherlands a hundred years ago? 😱
That isn't even relevant in any way to trading with China!. What a moron.
When he says fascist states and exploitative labor, I can't even tell if he means China or USA?
Or maybe he means both?

[-] DaveyRocket@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Oh man, you called me stupid. I guess you win. Now you won’t have to think about what I’m saying! Good job!

[-] kuiskaaja@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

this was a tradition until the early 2020s

[-] deWafelMan@lemmus.org 14 points 4 days ago

Selling euv to China will let them reverse engineer it and put a state sponsored competitor on the market within 5 years.

Frankly if Europe really meant business they’d put a heavy export tariff on it, so the chip companies have to produce in Europe.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Everybody can reverse engineer it, with that mindset nobody could ever sell anything.

[-] deWafelMan@lemmus.org 9 points 3 days ago

Nope, asml machines are of such complexity that no sane country/company would try to reverse engineer it.

But China isn’t driven by conventional economics nor honest trade. They want everyone else to become dependent on them as a way to get power and soft colonise others.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Why do you want them to sell to China so desperately? It has done nothing but irreversible damage to countries to sell key industries to China. Look at Germany‘s history of solar power and industry robots that China bought and now mass produces instead. Germany could‘ve been a key player in this if the industry and politics played their cards right.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't know what propaganda you are watching? Is it Fox News?
China is fucking 1.4 Billion people, they have invested heavily in infrastructure, education and research for 50 years, while we in Europe and USA have invested only about a third in those areas.
Of course they are catching up. Just like Japan did, Just like South Korea did. AND just like USA did stealing technology from Europe.
China is now among the world leaders in 8 out of 10 key industries. And very obviously, China is working on their own technology to replace ASML even harder now than they did a few years ago, exactly because USA has demanded we sanction the technology to slow them down on AI.
Well guess what. USA will lose the AI race to China so badly, that most probably ALL the big American AI companies will probably go bankrupt. Because they are driven by a gold rush craze, investing way more than the economy can justify. While in China they are pragmatically working towards using cheaper AI solutions to solve actual practical problems.

I want to trade with China because they are a WAY WAY more reliable trading partner than USA is.

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Well I know what kind of propaganda a tanky like you is gobbling up if you paint an inhumane, totalitarian regime that knows no human rights like some kind of intellectual utopia. If they manage to „develop their own“ anyway we both know it will be done with industrial espionage and not innovation.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I am very far from being a tankie, I'm a strong supporter of democracy.
You must be very poorly informed to make that post, have you seen any travel descriptions to China lately?
I never claimed it's a Utopia, but the fact is that China has invested way way more in education infrastructure and research than the west for decades.
To claim China does not have innovation is decidedly moronic. China is now registering more patents than USA, and is the new global leader.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Indicators

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

The newly developed dependence on US gas is a problem.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

A large portion of this business was American, just in case you didn't know.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

No it's not, ASML is Dutch and built on Dutch traditions for lithography through more than a century.
Just because a few Americans like Intel have stock in ASML doesn't make it American.

[-] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

This is like how Americans think they're from other places. I'm Italian! Declares a fifth generation American who speaks no Italian and has never left New Jersey

[-] TheMightyCat@ani.social 71 points 4 days ago

It's time for Europe to decide if we want to be a US puppet state or independent.

[-] Miller@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

It's time to play the music It's time to light the lights It's time to meet the Muppets on the Muppet Show tonight

[-] VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Even if I agreed that such export controls were of significant strategic importance, I don't think it's worth applying extreme pressure to our allies to accomplish it. The notion that China can't innovate becomes less true by the year.

The AI build out is an engineering disaster. China will catch up irrespective of what controls we apply to inhibit them. If we can't out-compete them, then we lose.

It would probably be much easier to out-compete them if we weren't actively destroying the greatest network of alliances in human history. We're fucking morons.

[-] kablez@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Fuck the United Pedo States of Shamerica

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 33 points 4 days ago

Europeans: We are not vassal states.

Also Europeans:

[-] Flower@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

At this stage, it's chosing between the old global power that you know will die soon but is still strong enough to hurt you, the most likely new global power that's rising fast, or putting in enough me money, effort and discomfort into becoming an independent power and explain that to a population that likes to vote for more purchasing power and pensions, not less.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

That's actually an excellent summary of the whole situation.

[-] Nugscree@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

The US keeps forgetting that if they disrupt ASML they also would not get their machines. Keep shooting yourself in the foot guys.

[-] FluidBeef@quokk.au 21 points 3 days ago

Does China not have its own women who whisper while rustling paper?

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 12 points 3 days ago

Some company in China just duplicated ASMLs shtick, didn’t they ?

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

China is advanced enough they can simply develop their own tech when forced to. Not always the cheaper or fastest option but it is a realistic one for most ideas.

[-] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 5 points 3 days ago

If so, maybe asml should team up with China to produce these machines. Completely cut out the hypocrites in the US out of the picture.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Yes and no. It'll still take many years to get to the same level. ASML has a huge head start

[-] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago

Like the headstart Germany had in solar, high speed rail, and automotive?

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Those aren't nearly as advanced as these high end lithography machines. A more apt comparison is a space race. But you're right, it doesn't last forever

[-] vetskari@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This feels again a bit dismissive. My whole life I have heard "it is okay, China is years away from doing any catch up, unlikely anything happens" and then China proceeds to catch up every. Single. Time.

if China has replicated the technology, then that is fucked for ASML and any headstart they have will not feel like one in 5 years when suddenly China speeds past with cheaper and better tech.

I hope ASML won't just sit idle and will instead double the effort into making sure the lead they have stays that way.

most recent one I can remember was "Chinese cars are years away from quality and safe cars of western countries who have a massive headstart" recently also been hearing that about memory production.

[-] poopkins@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think you're equally dismissive of the extreme complexity of these machines.

It's built upon an enormously complicated and precise arrangement of processes and infrastructure that took them decades to iterate towards. Even if you knew a shortcut to the answer and had infinite resources to throw at it, sorting out all the kinks is a monumental effort that can't be fixed within a few years by throwing more heads and hands at it.

I can't overstate how complex these machines are. They are arguably one of the most advanced things mankind has ever built.

[-] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I get that, nobody should get complacent. I'm from Eindhoven and I know many people at ASML. They are not complacent. They knew this day would come. They're racing for the next big thing even after EUV, of course they are, but nothing lasts forever. The head start is real, China can make a couple of these machines where ASML builds 60 per year. And these machines don't have anywhere near the chip production capacity of ASML's

[-] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Picture is more complicated as far as I understand.

China caught up to ASML. Not fully. Huawei even proceeded to propose innovation with vertical stacking and overall different chip designs.

Fine and dandy.

Machines ASML sell now took a fuck ton of time to even get to demo state.

Where this gets complicated, ASML is years into developing new generation machines, that will further chip design and production. In different materials than silicone.

And whether China will or can catch up to this is another question. Whether ASML delivers, is another one.

This is space race, but they are racing to different planets. All at the same time.

Painting this as A catching up to B appears extrimely simplistic.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe also release the tuning and tricks after? They are socialistic...

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 5 points 3 days ago

Oceania will not tolerate Eurasia giving technology to Eastasia.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

If they can’t buy it, they will steal the IP and sell it cheaper since they don’t have to repay R&D anymore.

Seriously, my country is fucking stupid.

this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
188 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87473 readers
2788 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS