62
I don't get why they're growing alfalfa in the regions least capable of sustaining its water needs.
The alfalfa growers hold snior water rights, so they can do whatever they feel like while everybody else suffers
"They" is also the Saudi government which uses the water to grow alfalfa necessary to raise dairy cattle.
I thought the Saudis grew Alfalfa in the US to send back to SA for fancy horses IIRC. Not even for cattle that will be eaten
600,000 dairy cows...
https://dairynews.today/milkypedia/country/sa/
They built up the herd size by growing alfalfa in the desert by pumping water from ancient aquifers. They have used up a significant portion and now import over 80% of their feed. They need to import 100% of the feed to meet their needs as their water dries up.
They bought ground in Arizona because it is grown in conditions like what they have experience with. They have been using the same alfalfa varieties.
Because "they" (the alfalfa growers & livestock corps) care about short-term financial profit, not long-term environmental sustainability.
I feel like I link this video at any opportunity, but Climate Town does have a really good explainer video on the entire mess with the Colorado River basin here, including the incentives behind growing alfalfa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XusyNT_k-1c
Alfalfa needs to be dried before you bale it; otherwise (ironically) it spontaneously combusts. It's cheapest to dry it out on the ground for a while between cutting and baling. If it rains during that time the crop is ruined.
It's too risky to rely on weather cooperation in a wetter region. Much safer to rely on irrigation in a desert.
The only US chance for survival is a complete overhaul of their political system and real corruption investigation for everyone involved into current administration with real jail times.
Otherwise current scum will just come back again next time.
I dont disagree with what youre saying being done, but it really has absolutely nothing to do with this article other than tangentially…
The US is a major contributor to climate change, but its far from the only one. The lack of water isnt from corruption. Its from climate induced draught that is eliminating snowpack. And the centuries old water management systems that were never designed for there to be no snowpack.
Even if trumps ilk, every congresscritter, and every billionaire were dragged out in the street tomorrow it wouldnt have any effect on the lack of water induced by climate change
The climate change that causes the lack of snowpack has everything to do with the corruption. Solving that wont solve climate change or the drought but it will drastically reduce further climate change and drought.
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
62 points (100.0% liked)
Climate
8925 readers
864 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS