2
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by evenwicht@lemmy.sdf.org to c/humanrights@crazypeople.online

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/57532633

Of course what this means is people who are not in Trump’s exclusive fiefdom will be excuded from access, at least for a period of time.

It’s being challenged as unconstitutional. But I think more basically it’s a violation of human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 21

  1. Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.
  2. Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

Trump’s “early access” program is inherently partaking in governance as it is communication between reps and those they represent. Knowing what is going on inside that nutjob’s brain is part of the democracy equation -- as precursor to protesting his next stupid idea. Yet in this case it would be exclusively available to paying subscribers, not everyone as required by art.21.

Trump’s move violates both paragraph 1 and 2 of Art.21.

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2026
2 points (100.0% liked)

Human Rights✊⚖

88 readers
2 users here now

!humanrights@crazypeople.online is a SAFE place to discuss human rights and related laws.

Related: !humanrights@lemmy.sdf.org (but down votes → less safe)

Loosely related: !Law@europe.pub, !juridisch@feddit.nl, !law@civilloquy.com, !law_us@lemmy.sdf.org, !legaladvice@feddit.uk, !legaladviceuk@feddit.uk, !uklaw@feddit.uk

Human rights law comes from many sources. E.g:

One important factor that makes this forum a safe structure is that silent down votes are impossible. Rationale:

  1. Down votes are a form of suppression.
  2. Silent down votes are uncivil and antithetical to human rights because they deny the other person the dignity of understanding.

How to express your urge to down vote: post a civil criticism that avoids logical fallacy (ad hominems in particular). Or up-vote an existing civil post that captures your criticism.

Moderation:

The moderator has a hands-off moderation style generally. However, human rights matters in a place calling itself “safe” calls for an extra degree of civility, thus uncivil posts will likely be more prone to mod intervention than other forums under the same moderation team (a team of 1 ATM).

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS